LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS AND MODES OF DEATH IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS WITH REDUCED VERSUS PRESERVED LEFT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Background: There are conflicting reports regarding the prognosis of heart failure patients with preserved (HFPSF) comparative to reduced systolic left ventricular function (HFRSF). We evaluated the clinical characteristics, mortality rates and modes of death in 309 consecutive symptomatic heart failure patients. In 133(56%) patients LVEF was <50% (HFRSF), and in 133 (44%), LVEF was ≥50% (HFPSF). Methods: Three hundred nine consecutive patients hospitalized between January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2010 (176 men and 133 women, mean age 64.3 years) were followed up for a mean period of 23±14 months. The severity of symptoms at admission was assessed by NYHA classification. 196 patients were in NYHA class I-II, and 113 in III–IV. All patients underwent chest X-ray, echocardiogram, and a 6-minute walking test. We compared the clinical profiles, mortality rates and modes of death. Results: More than a third (44%) of the patients had preserved systolic LVEF based on echocardiography. Compared to the HFPSF group, HFRSF patients were predominantly younger males with ischemic aetiology and less cardiovascular comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. During a mean follow-up period of 1.9 years, 22 (7.1%) patients died: 14 of cardiac causes and 8 of non-cardiac causes (4 of respiratory causes, 2 of stroke, 1 of major bleeding and 1 of cancer). Overall mortality was similar between the two groups: 8 (6%) in HFPSF patients and 14 (7.9%) in HFRSF patients (p=0.67). HFRSF patients had higher death rates due to pump failure compared to the HFPSF group [ 5/14(36%) vs. 1/8(12%) patients, p=0.5]. Non-cardiac deaths were more frequent in HFPSF group [4/8 (50%) patients vs. 4/14(28%) patients, respectively, p=0.5]. The prevalence of arrhythmic death was similar in the two groups [5/14(36%) vs.3/8(37%) patients, p=0.6]. With Cox stepwise regression analysis for survival, the independent predictors for mortality were age, gender, ischemic etiology of heart failure and renal impairment. Conclusions: Although the characteristics of HFPSF and SHF patients are different, the mortality rates were similar in our study. The mode of death was different among the two groups of patients, as pump failure death rate was higher in patients with LVEF <50%, while non-cardiac death was higher in heart failure patients with preserved systolic function. The differences were not statistically significant. A high NYHA class at admission, age over 65, male gender and renal impairment were related to a worse prognosis

Calcium, Magnesium, and Zinc Supplementation during Pregnancy: The Additive Value of Micronutrients on Maternal Immune Response after SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Magnesium may contribute to the immune response during and after SARS-CoV-2 infection by acting as a cofactor for immunoglobulin production and other processes required for T and B cell activity. Considering magnesium as a recommended dietary supplement during pregnancy and the possible role of magnesium deficiency in COVID-19 and its complications, the current study sought to determine the effect of magnesium and magnesium-containing nutritional supplements on the immune response following SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women, as well as to observe differences in pregnancy outcomes based on the supplements taken during pregnancy. The study followed a cross-sectional design, where patients with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection during their pregnancy were surveyed for their preferences in nutritional supplementation and their profile compared with existing records from the institutional database. A cohort of 448 pregnant women with COVID-19 during 22 months of the pandemic was assembled, out of which 13.6% took a magnesium-only supplement, and 16.5% supplemented their diet with a combination of calcium, magnesium, and zinc. Around 60% of patients in the no-supplementation group had the SARS-CoV-2 anti-RBD lower than 500 U/mL, compared with 50% in those who took magnesium-based supplements. A quantity of magnesium >450 mg in the taken supplements determined higher levels of antibody titers after COVID-19. Low magnesium dosage (<450 mg) was an independent risk factor for a weak immune response (OR-1.25, p-value = 0.003). The observed findings suggest supplementing the nutritional intake of pregnant women with magnesium-based supplements to determine higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 anti-RBD antibodies, although causality remains unclear

The Risk of Spontaneous Abortion Does Not Increase Following First Trimester mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination

Clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines initially excluded pregnant women due to safety concerns, and when the vaccines were authorized for emergency use, they were not recommended for this population. However, observational studies discovered that pregnant women infected with COVID-19 have higher risks of negative pregnancy and delivery outcomes compared to non-pregnant women, raising the question of the risks–benefits of administering COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women. By mid-2021, there was general consensus on the relative safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy; therefore, it is critical to investigate the safety issues related to these vaccines, considering the increasing acceptance among pregnant women. To address these concerns, we developed a research project to study the short-term effects and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination during the first trimester of pregnancy. Our research followed an observational retrospective design for 12 months from the beginning of the vaccination campaign, and included 124 cases of spontaneous abortions and 927 ongoing pregnancies. The odds of spontaneous abortion were non-significant for both versions of the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer BNT162b2 AOR = 1.04, CI = 0.91–1.12; Moderna mRNA-1273 AOR = 1.02, CI = 0.89–1.08). Overall, our data indicated that the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA COVID-19 immunization during the first trimester of pregnancy is commensurate with the predicted risk in non-vaccinated pregnant women. These findings contribute to the growing body of information regarding the safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy

Correlation of Lung Damage on CT Scan with Laboratory Inflammatory Markers in COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Center Study from Romania

(1) Background: This study aims to evaluate the association of CRP, NLR, IL-6, and Procalcitonin with lung damage observed on CT scans; (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 106 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Timisoara Municipal Emergency Hospital. Chest CT and laboratory analysis were performed in all patients. The rank Spearmen correlation was used to assess the association between inflammatory markers and lung involvement. In addition, ROC curve analysis was used to determine the accuracy of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of severe lung damage; (3) Results: CRP, NLR, and IL-6 were significantly positively correlated with lung damage. All inflammatory markers had good accuracy for diagnosis of severe lung involvement. Moreover, IL-6 has the highest AUC- ROC curve; (4) Conclusions: The inflammatory markers are associated with lung damage and can be used to evaluate COVID-19 severity

Predictive Value of SOFA and qSOFA for In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Center Study in Romania

Two years after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the disease continues to claim victims worldwide. Assessing the disease’s severity on admission may be useful in reducing mortality among patients with COVID-19. The present study was designed to assess the prognostic value of SOFA and qSOFA scoring systems for in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19. The study included 133 patients with COVID-19 proven by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) admitted to the Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital of Timisoara, Romania between 1 October 2020 and 15 March 2021. Data on clinical features and laboratory findings on admission were collected from electronic medical records and used to compute SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA and qSOFA values were higher in the non-survivor group compared to survivors (3.5 vs. 1 for SOFA and 2 vs. 1 for qSOFA, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to determine the discrimination accuracy, both risk scores being excellent predictors of in-hospital mortality, with ROC–AUC values of 0.800 for SOFA and 0.794 for qSOFA. The regression analysis showed that for every one-point increase in SOFA score, mortality risk increased by 1.82 and for every one-point increase in qSOFA score, mortality risk increased by 5.23. In addition, patients with SOFA and qSOFA above the cut-off values have an increased risk of mortality with ORs of 7.46 and 11.3, respectively. In conclusion, SOFA and qSOFA are excellent predictors of in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients. These scores determined at admission could help physicians identify those patients at high risk of severe COVID-19

The Predictive Role of NLR, d-NLR, MLR, and SIRI in COVID-19 Mortality

(1) Background: Since its discovery, COVID-19 has caused more than 256 million cases, with a cumulative death toll of more than 5.1 million, worldwide. Early identification of patients at high risk of mortality is of great importance in saving the lives of COVID-19 patients. The study aims to assess the utility of various inflammatory markers in predicting mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted among 108 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 hospitalized between 1 May 2021 and 31 October 2021 at Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital of Timisoara, Romania. Blood cell counts at admission were used to obtain NLR, dNLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI. The association of inflammatory index and mortality was assessed via Kaplan–Maier curves univariate Cox regression and binominal logistic regression. (3) Results: The median age was 63.31 ± 14.83, the rate of in-hospital death being 15.7%. The optimal cutoff for NLR, dNLR, MLR, and SIRI was 9.1, 9.6, 0.69, and 2.2. AUC for PLR and SII had no statistically significant discriminatory value. The binary logistic regression identified elevated NLR (aOR = 4.14), dNLR (aOR = 14.09), and MLR (aOR = 3.29), as independent factors for poor clinical outcome of COVID-19. (4) Conclusions: NLR, dNLR, MLR have significant predictive value in COVID-19 mortality

Using the NYHA Classification as Forecasting Tool for Hospital Readmission and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients with COVID-19

During the COVID-19 pandemic, it was observed that patients with heart disease are more likely to be hospitalized and develop severe COVID-19. Cardiac disease takes the top position among patient comorbidities, heart failure (HF) prevalence reaching almost 5% in the general population older than 35 years in Romania. This retrospective study aimed to determine the potential use of the NYHA classification for HF in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 as prognostic tool for in-hospital mortality, length of hospitalization, and probability of rehospitalization for HF decompensation. We observed that patients with advanced HF had a history of significantly more comorbid conditions that are associated with worse disease outcomes than the rest of patients classified as NYHA I and II. However, regardless of existing diseases, NYHA III, and, especially, NYHA IV, patients were at greatest risk for mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. They required significantly longer durations of hospitalization, ICU admission for mechanical ventilation, and developed multiple severe complications. NYHA IV patients required a median duration of 20 days of hospitalization, and their in-hospital mortality was as high as 47.8%. Cardiac biomarkers were significantly altered in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and advanced HF. Although the study sample was small, all patients with NYHA IV who recovered from COVID-19 required a rehospitalization in the following month, and 65.2% of the patients at initial presentation died during the next six months. The most significant risk factor for mortality was the development of severe in-hospital complications (OR = 4.38), while ICU admission was the strongest predictor for rehospitalization (OR = 5.19). Our result highlights that HF patients continue to be vulnerable post SARS-CoV-2 infection. Physicians and policymakers should consider this population’s high likelihood of hospital readmissions when making discharge, hospital capacity planning, and post-discharge patient monitoring choices

Immunogenicity Following Administration of BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 Vaccines in the Pregnant Population during the Third Trimester

Globally, COVID-19 vaccines are currently being used to prevent transmission and to reduce morbidity and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Current research reveals that vaccines such as BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S are highly immunogenic and have high short-term effectiveness for most of the known viral variants. Clinical trials showed satisfying results in the general population, but the reluctance in testing and vaccinating pregnant women left this category with little evidence regarding the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity following COVID-19 vaccination. With the worldwide incidence of COVID-19 remaining high and the possibility of new transmissible SARS-CoV-2 mutations, data on vaccination effectiveness and antibody dynamics in pregnant patients are critical for determining the need for special care or further booster doses. An observational study was developed to evaluate pregnant women receiving the complete COVID-19 vaccination scheme using the BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S, and determine pregnancy-related outcomes in the mothers and their newborns, as well as determining adverse events after vaccination and immunogenicity of vaccines during four months. There were no abnormal findings in pregnancy and newborn characteristics comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated pregnant women. COVID-19 seropositive pregnant women had significantly higher spike antibody titers than seronegative patients with similar characteristics, although they were more likely to develop fever and lymphadenopathy following vaccination. The same group of pregnant women showed no statistically significant differences in antibody titers during a 4-month period when compared with case-matched non-pregnant women. The BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines are safe to administer during the third trimester of pregnancy, while their safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity remain similar to those of the general population

Appraisal of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance in the Romanian Pregnant Population

Widespread COVID-19 vaccination is crucial for limiting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and minimizing the risk of novel variants arising in the general population, especially in pregnant women. According to the publicly available research data, vaccination intentions vary significantly by country, with Romania among the European countries with the lowest vaccination rates. Thus, we sought to determine the scale of acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign among pregnant women in Romania, as well as the variables affecting their choices. A cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women referred to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic of the Timisoara Municipal Emergency Hospital in Romania, where participants were asked to complete an online survey including standardized and unstandardized questionnaires indicating their willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and the reasons for their willingness. Out of the 500 women who were requested to participate, there was a total of 345 validated questionnaires, with 184 vaccinated and 161 unvaccinated pregnant women. The statistically significant determinant factors for COVID-19 vaccination acceptance were the urban area of residence (OR = 0.86), having a higher level of education (OR = 0.81), the third trimester of pregnancy (OR = 0.54), trusting the government (OR = 0.83), being a frequent traveler (OR = 0.76), fearing the severity of COVID-19 (OR = 0.68), the higher availability of COVID-19 vaccines nearby (OR = 0.87), and seeing more people getting vaccinated (OR = 0.75). As there are no increased risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 immunization in pregnant women, the variables identified in this research are crucial in determining the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines that should be addressed in this vulnerable group to increase vaccination rates

Predictive Value of Blood Coagulation Parameters in Poor Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study in Romania

SARS-CoV-2 infection produces alterations in blood clotting, especially in severe cases of COVID-19. Abnormal coagulation parameters in patients with COVID-19 are important prognostic factors of disease severity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of aPTT, D-dimer, INR and PT in the mortality of patients with COVID-19. A retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted on COVID-19 patients admitted to the Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital in Timisoara, Romania, between August and October 2021. Patients were confirmed as COVID-19 positive by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 82 patients were included in the analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of D-Dimer, INR, PT and aPTT were generated to assess whether the baseline of each of these biomarkers was accurately predictive for mortality in patients with COVID-19. Mortality among patients enrolled in this study was 20.7%, associated with older age and presence of heart disease. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of D-Dimer, INR, PT, and aPTT were 0.751, 0.724, 0.706 and 0.753. Differences in survival for patients with coagulation biomarker levels above cut-off values compared to patients below these values were statistically significant. All evaluated parameters had significant differences and good performance in predicting mortality of COVID-19 patients, except fibrinogen, which had no significant difference. Moreover, aPTT and D-dimer were the best performing parameters in predicting mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection