Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: Neck dissection and radiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy

Background Management of head and neck carcinoma from unknown primary (HNCUP) remains controversial, with neck dissection and radiotherapy (RT) or definitive RT both commonly used. The purpose of this study was to characterize HNCUP and retrospectively compare outcomes for patients treated with neck dissection + RT versus definitive RT. Methods From 1994 to 2009, 41 patients with HNCUP underwent either neck dissection + RT ( n  = 22) or definitive RT ± concurrent chemotherapy ( n  = 19) at our institution. Treatment outcomes were compared using Kaplan–Meier methods and log‐rank test. Results There were no differences between patients treated with neck dissection + RT and definitive RT in overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse‐free survival (LRFS), freedom from locoregional failure (FFLRG), or freedom from distant failure (FFDF). Among 17 patients who underwent neck dissection + RT for whom human papillomavirus (HPV) status could be determined, HPV(+) patients trended toward improved OS ( p  = .06) and PFS ( p  = .15). Conclusion Neck dissection and postoperative RT resulted in similar outcomes as definitive RT. The prognostic implications of HPV(+) nodes in HNCUP are similar to those in oropharyngeal primary cancers. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1589–1595, 2014Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109313/1/hed23479.pd

Comparison of high-dose Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and Cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the context of revised HPV-based staging

Aim: To perform a comparison of Cisplatin vs. Cetuximab in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in the context of the revised HPV-based staging.Background: Previous reports comparing these agents in head and neck cancer have included heterogenous disease and p16-status.Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted from 2006 to 2016 of patients with p16-positive OPSCC who underwent definitive radiotherapy concurrent with either triweekly Cisplatin (n = 251) or Cetuximab (n = 40). AJCC 8th Edition staging was adapted.Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 40 months. On multivariate analysis for all-comers, comparing Cisplatin and Cetuximab, 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR): 6% vs. 16% (p = 0.07), 3-year distant metastasis (DM): 8% vs. 21% (p = 0.04), 3-year overall recurrence rate (ORR): 11% vs. 29% (p = 0.01), and 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS): 94% vs. 79% (p = 0.06), respectively. On stage-based subgroup analysis, for stage III disease, 3-year LRR: 5% vs. 10% (p = 0.51), 3-year DM: 7% vs. 16% (p = 0.32), 3-year ORR: 10% vs. 23% (p = 0.15), and 3-year CSS: 95% vs. 82% (p = 0.38). For stage III disease, 3-year LRR: 10% vs. 40% (p = 0.07), 3-year DM: 9% vs. 43% (p = 0.07), 3-year ORR: 15% vs. 55% (p = 0.04), and 3-year CSS: 94% vs. 57% (p = 0.048).Conclusions: When given concurrently with radiotherapy, Cetuximab and triweekly Cisplatin demonstrated comparable efficacy for AJCC 8th Edition stage I–II p16-positive OPSCC. However, Cetuximab appeared to be associated with higher rates of treatment failure and cancer-related deaths in stage III disease. Upon availability of the RTOG 1016 trial results, analysis based on the revised HPV-based staging should be performed to confirm these findings