Antithrombin: anti-inflammatory properties and clinical applications

Many humoral and cellular components participate in bidirectional communication between the coagulation and inflammation pathways. Natural anticoagulant proteins, including antithrombin (AT), tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and protein C, suppress proinflammatory mediators. Conversely, inflammation blunts anticoagulant activity and, when uncontrolled, promotes systemic inflammation-induced coagulation, such as those that occur in disseminated intravascular coagulation and severe sepsis. This review discusses the mechanisms of action and clinical use of AT concentrate in critically ill patients and in the settings of perioperative anticoagulation management for surgery and obstetrics. AT is a serine protease inhibitor with broad anticoagulant activity and potent anti-inflammatory properties. In clinical conditions associated with hereditary or acquired AT deficiency, administration of AT concentrate has been shown to restore proper haemostasis and attenuate inflammation. Of note, AT modulates inflammatory responses not only by inhibiting thrombin and other clotting factors that induce cytokine activity and leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction, but also by coagulation-independent effects, including direct interaction with cellular mediators of inflammation. An increasing body of evidence suggests that AT concentrate may be a potential therapeutic agent in certain clinical settings associated with inflammation. In addition to the well-known anticoagulation properties of AT for the treatment of hereditary AT deficiency, AT also possesses noteworthy anti-inflammatory properties that could be valuable in treating acquired AT deficiency, which often result in thrombotic states associated with an inflammatory componen

Improved early survival with a nonsternotomy approach for continuous-flow left ventricular assist device replacement

Even in the modern era of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF LVADs), device replacement may be required. Nonsternotomy (NS) approaches are being used more commonly for replacement procedures. Outcomes after this less invasive approach compared with those after a reoperative sternotomy (RS) have not been extensively studied. Furthermore, the clinical impact of concurrent cardiac procedures during device replacement has not been examined. From 2005 to 2013, all consecutive implantable LVAD procedures were reviewed, and those using CF devices as both the initial and replacement device were identified. These CF LVAD replacement procedures were divided into those using an RS and those using an NS approach. Periprocedural morbidity and mortality were compared between the groups. A total of 42 CF LVAD replacements were performed in 39 patients, with 20 using an RS approach and 22 using an NS approach. Eleven of the 20 replacement procedures performed by RS included a concurrent cardiac procedure. Relative to the RS cohort, the NS approach was associated with shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time, reduced length of mechanical ventilation, decreased transfusion requirements, less inotropic support, decreased incidence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and overall hospital stays. An NS approach was also associated with improved 30- and 90-day survival (100% versus 79.0% in the RS group; p = 0.048). RS replacement procedures appeared to be associated with increased morbidity, regardless of whether they included concurrent cardiac procedures. Patients who did not require an RS approach and who underwent CF LVAD replacement through an NS approach had improved survival and reduced morbidity compared with those who required an RS

Rejuvenation solution as an adjunct cold storage solution maintains physiological haemoglobin oxygen affinity during early‐storage period of red blood cells

BackgroundRed blood cell (RBC) units accumulate morphologic and metabolic lesions during storage before transfusion. Pyruvate–inosine–phosphate–adenine (PIPA) solutions (Rejuvesol, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) can be incubated with RBC units to mitigate storage lesions. This study proposes a PIPA treatment process, termed cold ‘rejuvenation’, using Rejuvesol as an adjunct additive solution, to prevent biomechanical storage lesions while avoiding the 1 h PIPA incubation required with standard PIPA treatment. We compared the efficacy of cold to standard ‘rejuvenation’ in improving metabolic lesions that occur during cold storage of RBCs, without altering function.MethodsTwelve leucoreduced, A‐positive RBC units were obtained. Each unit was aliquoted into either control (standard storage), washed (W), standard rejuvenation (SR) or cold rejuvenation (CR) groups, the latter two requiring washing. A volume‐adjusted dose of Rejuvesol was instilled into the CR group upon receipt (Day 3). After 15 days of storage, p50, RBC deformability, in‐bag haemolysis and mechanical fragility were analysed. ‘Any treatment’ is defined as W, SR and CR, with comparisons in reference to control.ResultsHigher p50s were seen in rejuvenated groups (>30 mmHg vs. <19 mmHg; P < 0·0001). Any treatment significantly increased elongation index (P = 0·034) but did not significantly increase in‐bag haemolysis (P = 0·062). Mechanical fragility was not significantly different between groups (P = 0·055) at baseline, but the control (CTL) group was more fragile after 2 h in a cardiac bypass simulation than any treatment (P < 0·0001).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that rejuvenation (standard or cold) prevents the leftward p50 shift of storage lesions without detrimental effect on RBC deformity, in‐bag haemolysis or mechanical fragility.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156162/2/vox12910_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156162/1/vox12910.pd

Rejuvenation solution as an adjunct cold storage solution maintains physiological haemoglobin oxygen affinity during early‐storage period of red blood cells

BackgroundRed blood cell (RBC) units accumulate morphologic and metabolic lesions during storage before transfusion. Pyruvate–inosine–phosphate–adenine (PIPA) solutions (Rejuvesol, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) can be incubated with RBC units to mitigate storage lesions. This study proposes a PIPA treatment process, termed cold ‘rejuvenation’, using Rejuvesol as an adjunct additive solution, to prevent biomechanical storage lesions while avoiding the 1 h PIPA incubation required with standard PIPA treatment. We compared the efficacy of cold to standard ‘rejuvenation’ in improving metabolic lesions that occur during cold storage of RBCs, without altering function.MethodsTwelve leucoreduced, A‐positive RBC units were obtained. Each unit was aliquoted into either control (standard storage), washed (W), standard rejuvenation (SR) or cold rejuvenation (CR) groups, the latter two requiring washing. A volume‐adjusted dose of Rejuvesol was instilled into the CR group upon receipt (Day 3). After 15 days of storage, p50, RBC deformability, in‐bag haemolysis and mechanical fragility were analysed. ‘Any treatment’ is defined as W, SR and CR, with comparisons in reference to control.ResultsHigher p50s were seen in rejuvenated groups (>30 mmHg vs. <19 mmHg; P < 0·0001). Any treatment significantly increased elongation index (P = 0·034) but did not significantly increase in‐bag haemolysis (P = 0·062). Mechanical fragility was not significantly different between groups (P = 0·055) at baseline, but the control (CTL) group was more fragile after 2 h in a cardiac bypass simulation than any treatment (P < 0·0001).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that rejuvenation (standard or cold) prevents the leftward p50 shift of storage lesions without detrimental effect on RBC deformity, in‐bag haemolysis or mechanical fragility.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156162/2/vox12910_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156162/1/vox12910.pd

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant patients

The presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) increases the risk for thromboembolic events in ventricular assist device (VAD) patients undergoing transplantation. However, cardiopulmonary bypass with alternative anticoagulants is often complicated by bleeding. Owing to this concern, we compared outcomes of HIT-positive versus control bridge-to-transplantation VAD patients; both groups were reexposed to heparin for cardiopulmonary bypass during transplant. From February 2000 to January 2006, data were reviewed on 92 consecutive adult patients who underwent VAD placement as a bridge to transplantation. Patients in whom thrombocytopenia developed after heparin exposure were tested for HIT with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antiheparin/platelet factor-4 (HPF4) antibody (GTI Diagnostics, Waukesha, Wisconsin). During VAD support, heparin was avoided in HIT-positive patients, but all patients were reexposed to heparin during transplantation. Comparisons between HIT-positive and control patients for survival and freedom from thromboembolic events were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Student t test. Twenty-four of the 92 patients (26.1%) were determined to be HIT positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Survival to transplant was not different between the two groups. When compared with control patients, HIT-positive patients who were reexposed to heparin had a greater decrease in platelet counts immediately after transplant (postoperative days 1 to 4, p < 0.05). Despite this transient thrombocytopenia, there was no difference in posttransplant mortality or thromboembolism. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-positive VAD patients did not experience increased thromboembolism or mortality after heparin reexposure. In light of the risks of using heparin alternatives, heparin reexposure is a safe management strategy for HIT-positive VAD patients

Bedside Allogeneic Erythrocyte Washing with a Cell Saver to Remove Cytokines, Chemokines, and Cell-derived Microvesicles.

BackgroundRemoval of cytokines, chemokines, and microvesicles from the supernatant of allogeneic erythrocytes may help mitigate adverse transfusion reactions. Blood bank-based washing procedures present logistical difficulties; therefore, we tested the hypothesis that on-demand bedside washing of allogeneic erythrocyte units is capable of removing soluble factors and is feasible in a clinical setting.MethodsThere were in vitro and prospective, observation cohort components to this a priori planned substudy evaluating bedside allogeneic erythrocyte washing, with a cell saver, during cardiac surgery. Laboratory data were collected from the first 75 washed units given to a subset of patients nested in the intervention arm of a parent clinical trial. Paired pre- and postwash samples from the blood unit bags were centrifuged. The supernatant was aspirated and frozen at -70°C, then batch-tested for cell-derived microvesicles, soluble CD40 ligand, chemokine ligand 5, and neutral lipids (all previously associated with transfusion reactions) and cell-free hemoglobin (possibly increased by washing). From the entire cohort randomized to the intervention arm of the trial, bedside washing was defined as feasible if at least 75% of prescribed units were washed per protocol.ResultsPaired data were available for 74 units. Washing reduced soluble CD40 ligand (median [interquartile range]; from 143 [1 to 338] ng/ml to zero), chemokine ligand 5 (from 1,314 [715 to 2,551] to 305 [179 to 488] ng/ml), and microvesicle numbers (from 6.90 [4.10 to 20.0] to 0.83 [0.33 to 2.80] × 106), while cell-free hemoglobin concentration increased from 72.6 (53.6 to 171.6) mg/dl to 210.5 (126.6 to 479.6) mg/dl (P &lt; 0.0001 for each). There was no effect on neutral lipids. Bedside washing was determined as feasible for 80 of 81 patients (99%); overall, 293 of 314 (93%) units were washed per protocol.ConclusionsBedside erythrocyte washing was clinically feasible and greatly reduced concentrations of soluble factors thought to be associated with transfusion-related adverse reactions, increasing concentrations of cell-free hemoglobin while maintaining acceptable (less than 0.8%) hemolysis.Editor’s perspectiv