Major milestones in translational oncology.

Translational oncology represents a bridge between basic research and clinical practice in cancer medicine. Today, translational research in oncology benefits from an abundance of knowledge resulting from genome-scale studies regarding the molecular pathways involved in tumorigenesis. In this Forum article, we highlight the state of the art of translational oncology in five major cancer types. We illustrate the use of molecular profiling to subtype colorectal cancer for both diagnosis and treatment, and summarize the results of a nationwide screening program for ovarian cancer based on detection of a tumor biomarker in serum. Additionally, we discuss how circulating tumor DNA can be assayed to safely monitor breast cancer over the course of treatment, and report on how therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is proving effective in advanced lung cancer. Finally, we summarize efforts to use molecular profiling of prostate cancer biopsy specimens to support treatment decisions. Despite encouraging early successes, we cannot disregard the complex genetics of individual susceptibility to cancer nor the enormous complexity of the somatic changes observed in tumors, which urge particular attention to the development of personalized therapies

Increased serum tumor necrosis factor α levels in patients with lenalidomide-induced hypothyroidism

As the use of lenalidomide expands, the poorly understood phenomenon of lenalidomide-induced thyroid abnormalities will increase. In this study we compared rates of therapy-induced hypothyroidism in 329 patients with DLBCL treated with conventional chemotherapy (DLBCL-c) or conventional chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (DLBCL-len). We measured serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and interleukin-15 (IL-15) before and after treatment. We found a significantly higher rate of therapy-induced hypothyroidism in the DLBCL-len group (25.8% vs 1.3%), and we found a statistically significant increase in serum TNF-α in patients with lenalidomide-induced hypothyroidism

Successful Treatment and Retreatment With Erdafitinib for a Patient With FGFR3-TACC3 Fusion Squamous NSCLC: A Case Report

FGFR3-TACC3 fusions have been identified in patients with multiple cancer types, and tumors with these alterations are potentially sensitive to selective FGFR inhibitors. However, there are no FGFR inhibitors approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with NSCLC with FGFR alterations. Here, we report a case of a patient with FGFR3-TACC3 fusion squamous NSCLC who achieved a radiographic response and disease control for 11 months on initial treatment with erdafitinib and subsequently obtained an additional 8 months of disease control after erdafitinib retreatment after 5 months of intervening chemotherapy. Further investigation into FGFR inhibitor treatment specifically and targeted therapy retreatment for patients with NSCLC may increase our therapeutic options for these patients

First-line Chemotherapy Responsiveness and Patterns of Metastatic Spread Identify Clinical Syndromes Present Within Advanced KRAS Mutant Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer With Different Prognostic Significance.

BackgroundUnsuccessful KRAS-specific treatment approaches in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might reflect underlying disease heterogeneity. We sought to define clinical "syndromes" within advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC to improve future clinical trials and create a clinical framework for future molecular development.Patients and methodsTo test a series of a priori hypotheses regarding KRAS-mutant NSCLC clinical syndromes, we conducted a multi-institutional retrospective medical record review. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier model. Between-group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses and Wilcoxon rank sum testing were used to assess progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) differences.ResultsAmong 218 patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC, OS and progression-free survival with first-line chemotherapy did not differ by intrathoracic versus extrathoracic spread, smoking intensity, or the specific KRAS mutation. Metastatic disease at diagnosis resulted in significantly worse OS than recurrent, unresectable disease (median OS, 14.6 vs. 40.9 months; P = .001). Among the patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, nonscalp, soft tissue metastases (syndrome X; 6% of cases; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5%-10.1%) signified a poor prognosis (median OS, 7.5 vs. 15.9 months for the controls; P = .021). The response to first-line chemotherapy (syndrome Y; 41% of cases; 95% CI, 32.3%-50.6%) signified a good prognosis (median OS, 26.7 vs. 11.9 months; P = .002). The overlap between these 2 syndromes was minimal (2 of 111). Multivariate analysis confirmed these observations. The hazard ratio for death for syndromes X and Y was 2.64 (95% CI, 1.13-6.14) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.28-0.76), respectively.ConclusionChemotherapy-responsive disease and nonscalp, soft tissue spread might represent distinct clinical syndromes within KRAS-mutant NSCLC. The molecular biology underlying this heterogeneity warrants future studies

First-line Chemotherapy Responsiveness and Patterns of Metastatic Spread Identify Clinical Syndromes Present Within Advanced KRAS Mutant Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer With Different Prognostic Significance.

BackgroundUnsuccessful KRAS-specific treatment approaches in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might reflect underlying disease heterogeneity. We sought to define clinical "syndromes" within advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC to improve future clinical trials and create a clinical framework for future molecular development.Patients and methodsTo test a series of a priori hypotheses regarding KRAS-mutant NSCLC clinical syndromes, we conducted a multi-institutional retrospective medical record review. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier model. Between-group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses and Wilcoxon rank sum testing were used to assess progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) differences.ResultsAmong 218 patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC, OS and progression-free survival with first-line chemotherapy did not differ by intrathoracic versus extrathoracic spread, smoking intensity, or the specific KRAS mutation. Metastatic disease at diagnosis resulted in significantly worse OS than recurrent, unresectable disease (median OS, 14.6 vs. 40.9 months; P = .001). Among the patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, nonscalp, soft tissue metastases (syndrome X; 6% of cases; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5%-10.1%) signified a poor prognosis (median OS, 7.5 vs. 15.9 months for the controls; P = .021). The response to first-line chemotherapy (syndrome Y; 41% of cases; 95% CI, 32.3%-50.6%) signified a good prognosis (median OS, 26.7 vs. 11.9 months; P = .002). The overlap between these 2 syndromes was minimal (2 of 111). Multivariate analysis confirmed these observations. The hazard ratio for death for syndromes X and Y was 2.64 (95% CI, 1.13-6.14) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.28-0.76), respectively.ConclusionChemotherapy-responsive disease and nonscalp, soft tissue spread might represent distinct clinical syndromes within KRAS-mutant NSCLC. The molecular biology underlying this heterogeneity warrants future studies

Major milestones in translational oncology

Abstract Translational oncology represents a bridge between basic research and clinical practice in cancer medicine. Today, translational research in oncology benefits from an abundance of knowledge resulting from genome-scale studies regarding the molecular pathways involved in tumorigenesis. In this Forum article, we highlight the state of the art of translational oncology in five major cancer types. We illustrate the use of molecular profiling to subtype colorectal cancer for both diagnosis and treatment, and summarize the results of a nationwide screening program for ovarian cancer based on detection of a tumor biomarker in serum. Additionally, we discuss how circulating tumor DNA can be assayed to safely monitor breast cancer over the course of treatment, and report on how therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is proving effective in advanced lung cancer. Finally, we summarize efforts to use molecular profiling of prostate cancer biopsy specimens to support treatment decisions. Despite encouraging early successes, we cannot disregard the complex genetics of individual susceptibility to cancer nor the enormous complexity of the somatic changes observed in tumors, which urge particular attention to the development of personalized therapies