8 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
The effect of network topology on optimal exploration strategies and the evolution of cooperation in a mobile population
We model a mobile population interacting over an underlying spatial structure using a Markov movement model. Interactions take the form of public goods games, and can feature an arbitrary group size. Individuals choose strategically to remain at their current location or to move to a neighbouring location, depending upon their exploration strategy and the current composition of their group. This builds upon previous work where the underlying structure was a complete graph (i.e. there was effectively no structure). Here, we consider alternative network structures and a wider variety of, mainly larger, populations. Previously, we had found when cooperation could evolve, depending upon the values of a range of population parameters. In our current work, we see that the complete graph considered before promotes stability, with populations of cooperators or defectors being relatively hard to replace. By contrast, the star graph promotes instability, and often neither type of population can resist replacement. We discuss potential reasons for this in terms of network topology
Recommended from our members
Modelling Evolution in Structured Populations Involving Multiplayer Interactions
We consider models of evolution in structured populations involving multiplayer games. Whilst also discussing other models, we focus on the modelling framework developed by Broom and RychtΓ‘Ε (J Theor Biol 302:70β80, 2012) onwards. This includes key progress so far, the main gaps and limitations, the relationship and synergies with other models and a discussion of the direction of future work. In this regard as well as discussing existing work, there is some new research on the applicability and robustness of current models with respect to using them to model real populations. This is an important potential advance, as previously all of the work has been entirely theoretical. In particular, the most complex models will have many parameters, and we concentrate on considering simpler versions with a small number of parameters which still possess the key features which would make them applicable. We find that these models are generally robust, in particular issues that can arise related to small payoff changes at critical values and removal of pivotal vertices would have similar effects on other modelling system including evolutionary graph theory. These often occur where it can be argued that there is a lack of robustness in the real system that the model faithfully picks up, and so is not a problematic feature
Recommended from our members
Network topology and movement cost, not updating mechanism, determine the evolution of cooperation in mobile structured populations
Evolutionary models are used to study the self-organisation of collective action, often incorporating population structure due to its ubiquitous presence and long-known impact on emerging phenomena. We investigate the evolution of multiplayer cooperation in mobile structured populations, where individuals move strategically on networks and interact with those they meet in groups of variable size. We find that the evolution of multiplayer cooperation primarily depends on the network topology and movement cost while using different stochastic update rules seldom influences evolutionary outcomes. Cooperation robustly co-evolves with movement on complete networks and structure has a partially detrimental effect on it. These findings contrast an established principle from evolutionary graph theory that cooperation can only emerge under some update rules and if the average degree is lower than the reward-to-cost ratio and the network far from complete. We find that group-dependent movement erases the locality of interactions, suppresses the impact of evolutionary structural viscosity on the fitness of individuals, and leads to assortative behaviour that is much more powerful than viscosity in promoting cooperation. We analyse the differences remaining between update rules through a comparison of evolutionary outcomes and fixation probabilities
Recommended from our members
Models and measures of animal aggregation and dispersal
The dispersal of individuals within an animal population will depend upon local properties intrinsic to the environment that differentiate superior from inferior regions as well as properties of the population. Competing concerns can either draw conspecifics together in aggregation, such as collective defence against predators, or promote dispersal that minimizes local densities, for instance to reduce competition for food. In this paper we consider a range of models of non-independent movement. We include established models, such as the ideal free distribution, but also develop novel models, such as the wheel. We also develop several ways to combine different models to create a flexible model of addressing a variety of dispersal mechanisms. We further devise novel measures of movement coordination and show how to generate a population movement that achieves appropriate values of the measure specified. We find the value of these measures for each of the core models described, as well as discuss their use, and potential limitations, in discerning the underlying movement mechanisms. The movement framework that we develop is both of interest as a stand-alone process to explore movement, but also able to generate a variety of movement patterns that can be embedded into wider evolutionary models where movement is not the only consideration
Π Π΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Covid-19
Introduction. Despite the existence of generally accepted diagnostic protocols, when a new coronavirus infection is suspected, in some cases, it is increasingly difficult to detect changes in the lung tissue in a timely manner due to the heavy workload of the main method of radiation diagnostics β computed tomography.Β Purpose of the study. To determine the effectiveness of the appointment of an X-ray examination as first-line metgod, as well as to carry out a comparative analysis of the use of radiation diagnostics methods β computed tomography and radiography in relation to the diagnostic sensitivity to changes in lung tissue when a person is infected with the SARS-COV-2 virus.Materials and methods. 150 patients (63.0 Β± 8.4 years) with confirmed coronavirus infection were examined. Each of the participants underwent X-ray examination and computed tomography of the chest organs. The percentage of subjects studied for each of the degrees of severity of lung damage was determined to identify the proportion of involvement of lung tissue in the pathological process in the bulk of the examined individuals.Results. Of the 150 patients, changes in the lung tissue during chest X-ray were detected in 97 (65%), respectively, in 53 (35%), pathological changes in the lungs were not visualized. When examining patients by computed tomography, changes in the lungs were detected in 143 patients (95%), X-ray morphological changes were not detected in 7 subjects (5%). When detecting the volume of lung damage, it turned out that the majority of the subjects β 86 people (57%) β had the degree of damage CT-2. The degree of CT-1 and CT-3 was determined in 26 (17%) and 25 (17%) patients, respectively. CT-4 was observed in 6 patients (4%), and in 5% of cases, CT was not able to detect pathological changes in the lung tissue, the degree of CT-0 was established.Conclusion. In the assessment of viral lung damage, radiography takes a significant place, but in 35% of cases, radiographic examination failed to identify the existing pathological changes. CT of the chest organs confirms its value as the βgold standardβ in the study of pulmonary pathology in coronavirus infection, but if it is impossible to perform it, radiography is recommended.ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, Π² ΡΡΠ΄Π΅ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² Π»Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ Π²Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ β ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ β ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ sars-cov-2.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ 150 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² (63,0 + 8,4 Π»Π΅Ρ) Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Π²ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π»ΠΈΡ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ· 150 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½Π° Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ 97 ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
(65%), ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Ρ 53 ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ (35%) ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π½Π΅ Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ 143 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² (95%), ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Ρ 7 ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
(5 %). ΠΡΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
- 86 ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ (57%) Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠ’-2. Β Π‘ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΠ’-1 ΠΈ ΠΠ’-3 ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Ρ 26 (17%) ΠΈ 25 (17%) ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΠ’-4 Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Ρ 6 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
(4%), ΠΈ Π² 5% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² ΠΠ’ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² Π»Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅, Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΠ’-0.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎ, Π½ΠΎ Π² 35% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ’ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Β«Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΎΠΌΒ» ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ
Recommended from our members
The Evolution of Cooperation in a Mobile Population on Random Networks: Network Topology Matters Only for Low-Degree Networks
We consider a finite structured population of mobile individuals that strategically explore a network using a Markov movement model and interact with each other via a public goods game. We extend the model of Erovenko et al. (Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 475(2230):20190399, 2019) from complete, circle, and star graphs to various random networks to further investigate the effect of network topology on the evolution of cooperation. We discover that the network topology affects the outcomes of the evolutionary process only for networks of small average degree. Once the degree becomes sufficiently high, the outcomes match those for the complete graph. The actual value of the degree when this happens is much smaller than that of the complete graph, and the threshold value depends on other network characteristics