Influence of single and binary doping of strontium and lithium on in vivo biological properties of bioactive glass scaffolds

Effects of strontium and lithium ion doping on the biological properties of bioactive glass (BAG) porous scaffolds have been checked in vitro and in vivo. BAG scaffolds were prepared by conventional glass melting route and subsequently, scaffolds were produced by evaporation of fugitive pore formers. After thorough physico-chemical and in vitro cell characterization, scaffolds were used for pre-clinical study. Soft and hard tissue formation in a rabbit femoral defect model after 2 and 4 months, were assessed using different tools. Histological observations showed excellent osseous tissue formation in Sr and Li + Sr scaffolds and moderate bone regeneration in Li scaffolds. Fluorochrome labeling studies showed wide regions of new bone formation in Sr and Li + Sr doped samples as compared to Li doped samples. SEM revealed abundant collagenous network and minimal or no interfacial gap between bone and implant in Sr and Li + Sr doped samples compared to Li doped samples. Micro CT of Li + Sr samples showed highest degree of peripheral cancellous tissue formation on periphery and cortical tissues inside implanted samples and vascularity among four compositions. Our findings suggest that addition of Sr and/or Li alters physico-chemical properties of BAG and promotes early stage in vivo osseointegration and bone remodeling that may offer new insight in bone tissue engineering

Functional characterisation of HvCO1, the barley (Hordeum vulgare) flowering time ortholog of CONSTANS

Variation in photoperiod response is a major factor determining plant development and the agronomic performance of crops. The genetic control of photoperiodic flowering has been elucidated in the model plant Arabidopsis, and many of the identified genes are structurally conserved in the grasses. In this study, HvCO1, the closest barley ortholog of the key photoperiod response gene CONSTANS in Arabidopsis, was over-expressed in the spring barley Golden Promise. Over-expression of HvCO1 accelerated time to flowering in long- and short-day conditions and caused up-regulation of HvFT1 mRNA under long-day conditions. However, the transgenic plants retained a response to photoperiod, suggesting the presence of photoperiod response factors acting downstream of HvCO1 transcription. Analysis of a population segregating for HvCO1 over-expression and natural genetic variation at Ppd-H1 demonstrated that Ppd-H1 acts downstream of HvCO1 transcription on HvFT1 expression and flowering. Furthermore, variation at Ppd-H1 did not affect diurnal expression of HvCO1 or HvCO2. Over-expression of HvCO1 increased transcription of the spring allele of Vrn-H1 in long- and short-day conditions, while genetic variation at Ppd-H1 did not affect Vrn-H1 expression. Over-expression of HvCO1 and natural genetic variation at Ppd-H1 accelerated inflorescence development and stem elongation. Thus, HvCO1 probably induces flowering by activating HvFT1 whilst Ppd-H1 regulates HvFT1 independently of HvCO1 mRNA, and all three genes also appear to have a strong effect in promoting inflorescence development.Chiara Campoli, Benedikt Drosse, Iain Searle, George Coupland and Maria von Korf

Tissue engineering for bone defect healing: an update on a multi-component approach

SUMMARY: The need for an interdisciplinary approach in order to establish new therapeutic strategies for the therapy of bone defects has been acknowledged by the scientific community for many years. This awareness makes itself felt when looking at the multitude of approaches--ranging from cell-based to scaffold-based strategies and also including the use of osteogenic growth factors and genetic engineering--that are currently being combined to assess their potential to develop effective concepts for the treatment of extensive loss of osseous tissue. With a strong focus on the preclinical research in this field, the goal of this review is to give an update on the multi-component approaches that are currently being investigated in tissue engineering of bone

Comparison of different strategies for <em>in vivo</em> seeding of prevascularized scaffolds.

Scaffolds seeded with multipotent precursor cells were hypothesized to heal critically sized bone defects. However, the success of this concept was limited by low cell survival after transplantation due to a lack of nutrients and oxygen. In vivo prevascularization of scaffolds before cell seeding may improve cell survival, yet the best seeding technique and time point of cell application remain elusive. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare different strategies. Demineralized bone matrix scaffolds were implanted around the saphenous arteriovenous (AV) bundle in nude mice. In vivo seeding was performed 0, 5, or 21 days after implantation using enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-expressing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Cells were applied either by injection or the repetitive dripping technique. In vitro seeded and subcutaneously implanted scaffolds served as controls. Fourteen days after cell application, the fluorescence intensity of transplanted cells and the extent of newly formed vessels were quantified. We found that the AV flow through model as well as cell application increased vessel formation. In vitro seeding resulted in significantly higher cell numbers than in vivo seeding. With increasing time of prevascularization, the number of cells declined dramatically. In vivo seeding by cell injection was superior to the repetitive dripping protocol. On subcutaneously implanted scaffolds, significantly, more cells were found than on axially perfused scaffolds. We conclude that in vitro seeding is more efficient compared to the two novel in vivo seeding techniques of prevascularized scaffolds. With increasing time of prevascularization, the seeding efficiency for the in vivo methods further decreases, presumably due to the ingrowth of connective tissue. Even though, the presence of MSCs and the longer period of prevascularization enhances vessel formation, this conceivable advantage is limited supposedly by the inferior seeding efficiency