69 research outputs found

    Stick index of knots and links in the cubic lattice

    Full text link
    The cubic lattice stick index of a knot type is the least number of sticks necessary to construct the knot type in the 3-dimensional cubic lattice. We present the cubic lattice stick index of various knots and links, including all (p,p+1)-torus knots, and show how composing and taking satellites can be used to obtain the cubic lattice stick index for a relatively large infinite class of knots. Additionally, we present several bounds relating cubic lattice stick index to other known invariants.Comment: 16 pages, 12 figure

    Untangling polygons and graphs

    Full text link
    Untangling is a process in which some vertices of a planar graph are moved to obtain a straight-line plane drawing. The aim is to move as few vertices as possible. We present an algorithm that untangles the cycle graph C_n while keeping at least \Omega(n^{2/3}) vertices fixed. For any graph G, we also present an upper bound on the number of fixed vertices in the worst case. The bound is a function of the number of vertices, maximum degree and diameter of G. One of its consequences is the upper bound O((n log n)^{2/3}) for all 3-vertex-connected planar graphs.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figure

    Obstacle Numbers of Planar Graphs

    Full text link
    Given finitely many connected polygonal obstacles O1,,OkO_1,\dots,O_k in the plane and a set PP of points in general position and not in any obstacle, the {\em visibility graph} of PP with obstacles O1,,OkO_1,\dots,O_k is the (geometric) graph with vertex set PP, where two vertices are adjacent if the straight line segment joining them intersects no obstacle. The obstacle number of a graph GG is the smallest integer kk such that GG is the visibility graph of a set of points with kk obstacles. If GG is planar, we define the planar obstacle number of GG by further requiring that the visibility graph has no crossing edges (hence that it is a planar geometric drawing of GG). In this paper, we prove that the maximum planar obstacle number of a planar graph of order nn is n3n-3, the maximum being attained (in particular) by maximal bipartite planar graphs. This displays a significant difference with the standard obstacle number, as we prove that the obstacle number of every bipartite planar graph (and more generally in the class PURE-2-DIR of intersection graphs of straight line segments in two directions) of order at least 33 is 11.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017

    Quantum entanglement between a nonlinear nanomechanical resonator and a microwave field

    Get PDF
    We consider a theoretical model for a nonlinear nanomechanical resonator coupled to a superconducting microwave resonator. The nanomechanical resonator is driven parametrically at twice its resonance frequency, while the superconducting microwave resonator is driven with two tones that differ in frequency by an amount equal to the parametric driving frequency. We show that the semi-classical approximation of this system has an interesting fixed point bifurcation structure. In the semi-classical dynamics a transition from stable fixed points to limit cycles is observed as one moves from positive to negative detuning. We show that signatures of this bifurcation structure are also present in the full dissipative quantum system and further show that it leads to mixed state entanglement between the nanomechanical resonator and the microwave cavity in the dissipative quantum system that is a maximum close to the semi-classical bifurcation. Quantum signatures of the semi-classical limit-cycles are presented.Comment: 36 pages, 18 figure

    Re-embedding a 1-Plane Graph into a Straight-line Drawing in Linear Time

    Full text link
    Thomassen characterized some 1-plane embedding as the forbidden configuration such that a given 1-plane embedding of a graph is drawable in straight-lines if and only if it does not contain the configuration [C. Thomassen, Rectilinear drawings of graphs, J. Graph Theory, 10(3), 335-341, 1988]. In this paper, we characterize some 1-plane embedding as the forbidden configuration such that a given 1-plane embedding of a graph can be re-embedded into a straight-line drawable 1-plane embedding of the same graph if and only if it does not contain the configuration. Re-embedding of a 1-plane embedding preserves the same set of pairs of crossing edges. We give a linear-time algorithm for finding a straight-line drawable 1-plane re-embedding or the forbidden configuration.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2016). This is an extended abstract. For a full version of this paper, see Hong S-H, Nagamochi H.: Re-embedding a 1-Plane Graph into a Straight-line Drawing in Linear Time, Technical Report TR 2016-002, Department of Applied Mathematics and Physics, Kyoto University (2016

    Convex drawings of graphs with non-convex boundary

    Get PDF
    Abstract. In this paper, we study a new problem of finding a convex drawing of graphs with a non-convex boundary. It is proved that every triconnected plane graph whose boundary is fixed with a star-shaped polygon admits a drawing in which every inner facial cycle is drawn as a convex polygon. Such a drawing, called an inner-convex drawing, can be obtained in linear time.

    A polynomial bound for untangling geometric planar graphs

    Get PDF
    To untangle a geometric graph means to move some of the vertices so that the resulting geometric graph has no crossings. Pach and Tardos [Discrete Comput. Geom., 2002] asked if every n-vertex geometric planar graph can be untangled while keeping at least n^\epsilon vertices fixed. We answer this question in the affirmative with \epsilon=1/4. The previous best known bound was \Omega((\log n / \log\log n)^{1/2}). We also consider untangling geometric trees. It is known that every n-vertex geometric tree can be untangled while keeping at least (n/3)^{1/2} vertices fixed, while the best upper bound was O(n\log n)^{2/3}. We answer a question of Spillner and Wolff [arXiv:0709.0170 2007] by closing this gap for untangling trees. In particular, we show that for infinitely many values of n, there is an n-vertex geometric tree that cannot be untangled while keeping more than 3(n^{1/2}-1) vertices fixed. Moreover, we improve the lower bound to (n/2)^{1/2}.Comment: 14 pages, 7 figure

    Duality properties of indicatrices of knots

    Full text link
    The bridge index and superbridge index of a knot are important invariants in knot theory. We define the bridge map of a knot conformation, which is closely related to these two invariants, and interpret it in terms of the tangent indicatrix of the knot conformation. Using the concepts of dual and derivative curves of spherical curves as introduced by Arnold, we show that the graph of the bridge map is the union of the binormal indicatrix, its antipodal curve, and some number of great circles. Similarly, we define the inflection map of a knot conformation, interpret it in terms of the binormal indicatrix, and express its graph in terms of the tangent indicatrix. This duality relationship is also studied for another dual pair of curves, the normal and Darboux indicatrices of a knot conformation. The analogous concepts are defined and results are derived for stick knots.Comment: 22 pages, 9 figure

    Integrality gaps of integer knapsack problems

    Get PDF
    We obtain optimal lower and upper bounds for the (additive) integrality gaps of integer knapsack problems. In a randomised setting, we show that the integrality gap of a “typical” knapsack problem is drastically smaller than the integrality gap that occurs in a worst case scenario
    corecore