Does Emotional Intelligence at medical school admission predict future licensing examination performance?

Background: Medical school admissions committees are seeking alternatives to traditional academic measures when selecting students; one potential measure being emotional intelligence (EI). If EI is to be used as an admissions criterion, it should predict future performance. The purpose of this study is to determine if EI scores at admissions predicts performance on a medical licensure examination Methods: All medical school applicants to the University of Ottawa in 2006 and 2007 were invited to complete the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT v2.0) after their interview. Students were tracked through medical school into licensure and EI scores were correlated to their scores on the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination (MCCQE) attempted between 2010 and 2014. Results: The correlation between the MSCEIT and the MCCQE Part I was r (200) = .01 p =. 90 The covariates of age and gender accounted for a significant amount of variance in MCCQE Part I scores (R2 = .10, p <.001, n=202) but the addition of the MSCEIT scores was not statistically significant (R2 change = .002, p=.56). The correlation between the MSCEIT and the MCCQE Part II was r(197) = .06, p = .41. The covariates of age and gender accounted for some variance in MCCQE Part II scores (R2 = .05, p = .007, n=199) but the addition of the MSCEIT did not (R2 change = .002 p =.55). Conclusion: The low correlations between EI and licensure scores replicates other studies that have found weak correlations between EI scores and tests administered at admissions and during medical school.  These results suggest caution if one were to use EI as part of their admissions process

Exploring the institutional logics of health professions education scholarship units

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137533/1/medu13334.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137533/2/medu13334_am.pd

The use of virtual nominal groups in healthcare research: An extended scoping review

Introduction The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a consensus group method used to synthesize expert opinions. Given the global shift to virtual meetings, the extent to which researchers leveraged virtual platforms is unclear. This scoping review explores the use of the vNGT in healthcare research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Following the Arksey and O'Malley's framework, eight cross-disciplinary databases were searched (January 2020-July 2022). Research articles that reported all four vNGT stages (idea generation, round robin sharing, clarification, voting) were included. Media Synchronicity Theory informed analysis. Corresponding authors were surveyed for additional information. Results Of 2,589 citations, 32 references were included. Articles covered healthcare (27/32) and healthcare education (4/32). Platforms used most were Zoom, MS Teams and GoTo but was not reported in 44% of studies. Only 22% commented on the benefits/challenges of moving the NGT virtually. Among authors who responded to our survey (16/32), 80% felt that the vNGT was comparable or superior. Conclusions The vNGT provides several advantages such as the inclusion of geographically dispersed participants, scheduling flexibility and cost savings. It is a promising alternative to the traditional in-person meeting, but researchers should carefully describe modifications, potential limitations, and impact on results

Teaching and assessing procedural skills: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Graduating Internal Medicine residents must possess sufficient skills to perform a variety of medical procedures. Little is known about resident experiences of acquiring procedural skills proficiency, of practicing these techniques, or of being assessed on their proficiency. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate resident 1) experiences of the acquisition of procedural skills and 2) perceptions of procedural skills assessment methods available to them. Methods Focus groups were conducted in the weeks following an assessment of procedural skills incorporated into an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Using fundamental qualitative description, emergent themes were identified and analyzed. Results Residents perceived procedural skills assessment on the OSCE as a useful formative tool for direct observation and immediate feedback. This positive reaction was regularly expressed in conjunction with a frustration with available assessment systems. Participants reported that proficiency was acquired through resident directed learning with no formal mechanism to ensure acquisition or maintenance of skills. Conclusions The acquisition and assessment of procedural skills in Internal Medicine programs should move toward a more structured system of teaching, deliberate practice and objective assessment. We propose that directed, self-guided learning might meet these needs

Current state of headache training within Canadian Neurology Residency program: a national survey

Abstract Background Headache disorders are the most common neurological disorders worldwide. Despite their widespread prevalence and importance, the topic of headache is inconsistently taught at both the undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The goal of this study is to establish a better picture of the current state of Headache Medicine (HM) training in Neurology postgraduate programs in Canada and describe the impact of the current pandemic on training in this domain. Methods Online surveys were sent to senior residents of adult Neurology programs in Canada. We also conducted telephone interviews with Neurology Program Directors. Descriptive statistics were analyzed, and thematic analysis was used to review free text. Results A total of 36 residents, and 3 Program Directors participated in the study. Most of the teaching in HM is done by headache specialists and general neurology faculty. Formal teaching is mainly given during academic half day. Most of the programs expose their residents to Onabotulinum toxin A injections and peripheral nerve blocks, but they don’t offer much formal teaching regarding these procedures. Residents consider HM teaching important and they would like to have more. They don’t feel comfortable performing interventional headache treatments, despite feeling this should be part of the skillset of a general neurologist. Conclusion Our study is the first to establish the current state of headache teaching in post-graduate neurology programs as perceived by trainees and program directors in Canada. The current educational offerings leave residents feeling poorly prepared to manage headaches, including procedural interventions. There is a need to diversify the source of teaching, so the educational burden doesn’t lie mostly upon Headache specialists who are already in short supply. Neurology Residency programs need to adapt their curriculum to face the current need in HM

L’impact des subventions locales pour l’éducation des professions de la santé : l’investissement en vaut-il la peine?

Background: Local grants programs are important since funding for medical education research is limited. Understanding which factors predict successful outcomes is highly relevant to administrators. The purpose of this project was to identify factors that contribute to the publication of local medical education grants in a Canadian context. Methods: Surveys were distributed to previous Department of Innovation in Medical Education (DIME) and Department of Medicine (DOM) grant recipients (n = 115) to gather information pertaining to PI demographics and research outcomes. A backward logistic regression was used to determine the effects several variables on publication success.  Results: The overall publication rate was 64/115 (56%). Due to missing data, 91 grants were included in the logistic regression. Variables associated with a higher rate of publication; cross departmental compared to single department OR = 2.82 (p = 0.04), being presented OR = 3.30 (p = 0.01), and multiple grant acquisition OR = 3.85 (p = 0.005)  Conclusion: Although preliminary, our data suggest that increasing research publications from local grants may be facilitated by pooling funds across departments, making research presentations mandatory, and allowing successful researchers to re-apply.Objectif : Les programmes de subventions locales sont importants car le financement de la recherche en éducation médicale est limité. Il est très important pour les administrateurs de comprendre quels sont les facteurs de réussite. Le but de ce projet était d’identifier les facteurs qui, dans le contexte canadien, contribuent à la publication d’articles à l’aide de subventions locales pour l’éducation médicale. Méthodes : Un sondage a été réalisé auprès des anciens récipidendaires de subventions du Department of Innovation in Medical Education (DIME) et du Department of Medicine (DOM) (n=115) afin de recueillir des informations relatives à la démographie des chercheurs principaux et aux résultats de la recherche. Une régression logistique descendante a été utilisée pour déterminer les effets de plusieurs variables sur le succès des publications. Résultats : Le taux de publication global était de 64/115 (56 %). En raison de données manquantes, 91 subventions ont été incluses dans la régression logistique. Variables associées à un taux de publication plus élevé; OR inter-départements comparé à un seul département = 2,82 (p = 0,04), soumis OR = 3,30 (p = 0,01) et OR l’’obtention de plusieurs subventions = 3,85 (p = 0,005). Conclusion : Bien que préliminaires, nos données suggèrent que la publication de recherches à l’aide de subventions locales pourrait être facilitée en regroupant les fonds des divers départements, en rendant la présentation de recherches obligatoire et en permettant aux chercheurs dont l’article a été retenu de faire une nouvelle soumission

Illness presenteeism among physicians and trainees: Study protocol of a scoping review.

BackgroundIllness presenteeism (IP) is the phenomenon where individuals continue to work despite illness. While it has been a prevalent and longstanding issue in medicine, the recent onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the growing movement to improve physician wellness brings renewed interest in this topic. However, there have been no comprehensive reviews on the state of literature of this topic.PurposeThe main aim of this scoping review is to explore what is known about presenteeism in physicians, residents, and medical students in order to map and summarize the literature, identify research gaps and inform future research. More specifically: How has illness presenteeism been defined, problematized or perceived? What methods and approaches have been used to study the phenomenon? Has the literature changed since the pandemic?MethodUsing the Arksey and O'Malley framework several databases will be searched by an experienced librarian. Through an iterative process, inclusion and exclusion criteria will be developed and a data extraction form refined. Data will be analyzed using quantitative and qualitative content analyses.Potential implications of resultsBy summarizing the literature on IP, this study will provide a better understanding of the IP phenomena to inform future research and potentially have implications for physician wellness and public health