Cereal density and N-fertiliser effects on the flora and biodiversity value of arable headlands

Modern intensive farming caused pronounced changes to the European arable flora. Many species adapted to less intensive traditional farming declined severely, as did the potential of unsown arable vegetation to support higher trophic levels. To reverse these trends, various agri-environment measures were introduced. One such measure is to manage cereal headlands as conservation headlands, involving strict restrictions on pesticide and fertiliser use. An additional modification to management which could reduce crop competition and thus deliver benefits to arable plants is cereal sowing at reduced rates. However, little is known about its benefits to rare and declining arable plants, or to species of value to higher trophic levels, and whether it can be implemented without concomitant increase in undesirable weeds. We set up identical two-factorial experiments in winter wheat and spring barley, combining a nitrogen fertiliser versus no fertiliser treatment with cereal sowing at economic rates versus sowing at rates reduced by 75 %, with added sowing of a mixture of rare arable species. Both experiments also included an uncropped but cultivated control equivalent to another agri-environment measure. Our results show that reduced cereal sowing in conservation headlands can benefit rare and declining species, as well as arable plant diversity, without necessarily resulting in a concomitant increase in undesirable weeds. While such benefits tended to be larger in uncropped cultivated controls, conservation headlands have the advantage of not requiring land being taken out of production. Moreover, as shown in this study, their benefits to arable plants can be maximised by reduced sowing

Practical methods for the control of tor-grass (Brachypodium pinnatum s.l.) and the restoration of calcareous grassland

Calcareous grasslands are sites of high conservation value across Western Europe; however, they are increasingly threatened by the dominance of a native competitive grass, Brachypodium pinnatum, which reduces the diversity of the grassland. Despite this, there is no clear consensus on the most effective method for controlling B. pinnatum and restoring the grassland community. We established two experiments at a calcareous grassland of high nature conservation value in the UK, i) a herbicide spraying experiment with seeding and ii) a seasonal cut-and-graze experiment, to investigate the potential for reducing dense B. pinnatum cover and preventing further expansion of sparse cover, respectively. We examined the effect of different herbicide and cut-and-graze treatments on B. pinnatum cover, and on the species richness and diversity of the grassland over three consecutive years. Herbicide spraying reduced the cover of B. pinnatum, though two spray applications led to a greater reduction longer-term. Species richness and diversity initially declined with the herbicide spray, however this recovered rapidly to levels higher than before spraying commenced. Seeding the spray plots was beneficial for the establishment of Bromopsis erecta and potentially reduced the likelihood of re-colonisation by B. pinnatum and undesirable arable species. The cut-and-graze experiment also showed promising potential in terms of controlling the spread of B. pinnatum. Compared with a single cut in the spring or autumn, cutting and grazing twice, in both spring and autumn was found to reduce the cover of B. pinnatum, whilst also increasing species richness and diversity. Further monitoring is needed to determine the long-term effectiveness of this management treatment

Biological Flora of Britain and Ireland: <i>Geranium pratense</i> - No. 305

1. This account presents information on all aspects of the biology of Geranium pratense L. (Meadow Crane's‐Bill). The main topics are presented within the standard framework of the Biological Flora of Britain and Ireland : distribution, habitat, communities, responses to biotic factors, responses to environment, structure and physiology, phenology, floral and seed characters, herbivores and disease, history and conservation.2. Geranium pratense is a perennial gynodioecious forb of neutral grassland. In Britain and Ireland, it is particularly abundant on roadside verges, railway embankments, the margins of watercourses and woodland rides. It is generally intolerant of grazing and is absent or scarce in livestock‐grazed grassland. Geranium pratense is widespread in England, Wales and Scotland but is scarce in Ireland. It has an extensive native range in Europe and Asia, extending eastwards to Russia, north‐western China and Mongolia. It has been widely introduced to new sites within its native range and has been introduced to Canada, the USA and New Zealand. 3. Geranium pratense usually occurs on free‐draining soils but also infrequently where drainage is impeded. The soils are often nutrient‐rich and weakly acidic to weakly alkaline. The underlying geology is usually non‐acidic sedimentary rocks or superficial deposits. 4. Geranium pratense is protandrous and is pollinated by various insects of the orders Hymenoptera, Diptera and Lepidoptera, particularly bumblebees, solitary bees, hoverflies and butterflies. Eleven species of phytophagous insect have been recorded on G. pratense in Britain and Ireland.5. Geranium pratense has little or no capacity for vegetative spread. Primary seed dispersal is ballistic and seeds may be flung over distances of up to several metres. The species has a transient seed bank, that is germination typically takes place in the winter and spring after seed production, after the physically dormant seeds have become permeable. Seedling establishment is higher in vegetation‐free gaps than in undisturbed grassland vegetation.6. There has been no significant change in its distribution between the late 1950s and 2019, although since 2000, it has expanded its range, mainly via introductions, in northern and western Scotland, west Wales and in Ireland. Alien sites have increased markedly since the 1960s due to introductions from wildflower seed sowing and spread from gardens

Little and late: how reduced hedgerow cutting can benefit Lepidoptera

Hedgerows are a key semi-natural habitat for biodiversity in intensive agricultural landscapes across northern Europe and support a large invertebrate fauna. Management can have large effects on the value of hedgerows as a wildlife habitat, thus sensitive management is incentivised through agri-environment schemes (AES). We tested how current and potential future AES hedge management regimes affected the diversity and abundance of Lepidoptera species that utilise the hedge as a breeding resource, using a long term, multi-site, manipulative field experiment. Hedgerow management in some current AES options (reduced trimming frequency and cutting in winter) increased Lepidoptera abundance and the diversity of components of the Lepidoptera community linked with specific lifecycle traits. However, the most frequently applied hedgerow AES option currently applied in the UK (cutting once every 2 years in autumn) did not benefit Lepidoptera compared to standard hedgerow management outside AES (annual trimming in autumn). Decreasing the intensity of hedgerow trimming improves the diversity of the whole Lepidoptera assemblage, and should be considered as part of biodiversity conservation in farmed landscapes

Creation and Management of Pollen and Nectar Habitats on Farmland: Annual report 2007/8

1. Intensive farming has contributed to the serious declines in the abundance and diversity of bumblebee and butterflies. 2. UK agri-environmental policy aims to conserve and restore bee and butterfly populations by providing foraging habitats on land taken out of production. 3. Recent research suggests that current management prescriptions are failing to provide pollen and nectar habitats of sufficient quality and longevity in the wider countryside. 4. We report the findings of a range of integrated experiments to determine the best means of creating and managing pollen and nectar habitats on arable farmland in the UK. 5. Experiment 1: examines the flowering performance and persistence of a range of Red clover varieties managed under different cutting regimes. 6. Over four years the agricultural variety of Red clover Milvus and the wild variety from Somerset were the most persistent. Summer cutting (June) with or without an autumn cut significantly enhanced the cover of Red clover and the abundance of flowers. However, this cutting regime reduced cover and flower abundance of other sown legumes, such as Birdsfoot trefoil. Removal of cut material significantly increased the cover and flower abundance of sown broad-leaved species. 7. Experiment 2: investigated the performance of pollen- and nectar-rich broad-leaved species sown with grasses of differing competitive ability. 8. The typical practice of sowing tall and competitive grass species, such as Meadow Fescue, Timothy and Rye grass, significantly reduced the cover legume species. Persistence of sown legumes was significantly better in mixtures sown either without grasses, or with fine-leaved grasses, such as Crested Dogstail. Winter application of the graminicide propyzamide (Kerb Flo, Dow AgroSciences Ltd.) in year 3 reduced competition from grasses, increased cover of sown dicots and undesirable weed species (Cirsium sp.). 9. Experiment 3: compared the foraging preference of bumblebees and butterflies for a range of annual crop species sown in wild bird seed mixes with perennials sown in pollen and nectar seed mixtures. 10. In year 1 flowers of annual species were much more abundant than those of perennials. In year 2 flower abundance of perennials, such as Red clover and Sweet clover, were similar to the annual species. There were marked differences in the timing of peak flowering between species: Crimson clover flowered in late May, Fodder radish in late June, Borage, Phacelia. Red clover and Sweet clover in late July, Sunflower in late August. Short-tongued bees showed a marked preference for Phacelia and Borage. Long-tongued bees showed a significant preference for Red clover, Crimson clover and Sainfoin

The potential to increase grassland soil C stocks by extending reseeding intervals is dependent on soil texture and depth

Grasslands account for ∼30% of global terrestrial carbon (C), of which most is stored in soils and provide important ecosystem services including livestock and forage production. Reseeding of temporary grasslands on a 5-year cycle is a common management practice to rejuvenate sward productivity and reduce soil compaction, but is physically disruptive and may reduce soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. However, research to date is limited, which impacts on the ability to optimise grassland management for climate change mitigation. To determine whether extending the time interval up to 20 years between grassland reseeding can increase stable SOC stocks, a soil survey was conducted across three UK grassland chrono-sequences comprising 24 fields on contrasting soil types. We found that grassland SOC stocks (39.8–114.8 Mg C ha−1) were higher than co-located fields in arable rotations (29.3–83.2 Mg C ha−1) and the relationship with grassland age followed a curvilinear relationship with rapid SOC stock accumulation in the year following reseeding (2.69–18.3 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) followed by progressively slower SOC accumulation up to 20 years. Contrary to expectation, all grasslands had similar soil bulk densities and sward composition questioning the need for traditional 5-year reseeding cycles. Fractionation of soils into stable mineral associated fractions revealed that coarse textured grassland topsoils (0–15 cm) were near-saturated in C irrespective of grassland age whilst loam soils reached saturation ∼10 years after reseeding. Fine-textured topsoils and subsoils (15–30 cm) of all textures were under saturated and thus appear to hold the most potential to accrue additional stable C. However, the lack of a relationship between C saturation deficit and grassland age in subsoils suggests that more innovative management to promote SOC redistribution to depth, such as a switch to diverse leys or full inversion tillage may be required to maximise subsoil SOC stocks. Taken together our findings suggest that extending the time between grassland reseeding could temporarily increase SOC stocks without compromising sward composition or soil structure. However, detailed monitoring of the trade-offs with grassland productivity are required. Fine textured soils and subsoils (15–30 cm) have the greatest potential to accrue additional stable C due to under saturation of fine mineral pools

Long-term effects of hedgerow management policies on resource provision for wildlife

Hedgerows provide important habitat and food resources for overwintering birds, mammals and invertebrates. Currently, 41% of managed hedgerow length in England forms part of three Agri-Environment Scheme (AES) options, which specify a reduction in hedgerow cutting frequency from the most common practice of annual cutting. These AES options aim to increase the availability of flowers and berries for wildlife, but there has been little rigorous testing of their efficacy or estimates of the magnitude of their effects. We conducted a factorial experiment on hawthorn hedges to test the effects of (i) cutting frequency (every 1, 2 or 3 years) and (ii) timing of cutting (autumn vs. winter) on the abundance of flowers and berry resources. Results from 5 years show that hedgerow cutting reduced the number of flowers by up to 75% and the biomass of berries available over winter by up to 83% compared to monitored uncut hedges. Reducing cutting frequency from every year to every 3 years resulted in 2.1 times more flowers and a 3.4 times greater berry mass over 5 years. Cutting every 2 years had an intermediate effect on flower and berry abundance, but the increase in biomass of berries depended on cutting in winter rather than autumn. The most popular AES option is cutting every 2 years (32% of English managed hedgerow length). If these hedges were managed under a 3 year cutting regime instead, we estimate that biomass of berries would increase by about 40%, resulting in a substantial benefit for wildlife

Establishment and management of wildflower areas for insect pollinators in commercial orchards

Sown wildflower areas are increasingly recommended as an agri-environmental intervention measure, but evidence for their success is limited to particular insect groups or hampered by the challenges of establishing seed mixes and maintaining flower abundance over time. We conducted a replicated experiment to establish wildflower areas to support insect pollinators in apple orchards. Over three years, and across 23 commercial UK orchards with and without sown wildflowers, we conducted 828 transect surveys across various non-crop habitats. We found that the abundance of flower-visiting solitary bees, bumblebees, honeybees, and beetles was increased in sown wildflower areas, compared with existing non-crop habitats in control orchards, from the second year following floral establishment. Abundance of hoverflies and other non-syrphid flies was increased in wildflower areas from the first year. Beyond the effect of wildflower areas, solitary bee abundance was also positively related to levels of floral cover in other local habitats within orchards, but neither local nor wider landscape-scale context affected abundance of other studied insect taxa within study orchards. There was a change in plant community composition on the sown wildflower areas between years, and in patterns of flowering within and between years, showing a succession from unsown weedy species towards a dominance of sown species over time. We discuss how the successful establishment of sown wildflower areas and delivery of benefits for different insect taxa relies on appropriate and reactive management practices as a key component of any such agri-environment scheme

Population responses of honeybees to oilseed rape neonicotinoid seed treatments in Hungary, Germany and the UK

The data set describes the effects of three neonicotinoid seed treatments (clothianidin, thiamethoxam and a control) applied to winter sown oilseed rape in Hungary, Germany and the UK on honeybees (Apis mellifera). The data describes population responses in terms of European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) primary (colony strength and overwintering success) and secondary assessment endpoints for the response of honeybees to exposure to the neonicotinoids. Information on expression of neonicotinoids in the pollen and nectar from the crop or collected by bees is also included, as well as details of honeybee diseases and foraging preferences