Holmium-166 radioembolization for the treatment of patients with liver metastases: design of the phase I HEPAR trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Intra-arterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres ( ⁹⁰Y-RE) is an increasingly used therapy for patients with unresectable liver malignancies. Over the last decade, radioactive holmium-166 poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres ( ¹⁶⁶Ho-PLLA-MS) have been developed as a possible alternative to ⁹⁰Y-RE. Next to high-energy beta-radiation, ¹⁶⁶Ho also emits gamma-radiation, which allows for imaging by gamma scintigraphy. In addition, Ho is a highly paramagnetic element and can therefore be visualized by MRI. These imaging modalities are useful for assessment of the biodistribution, and allow dosimetry through quantitative analysis of the scintigraphic and MR images. Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of ¹⁶⁶Ho-PLLA-MS radioembolization ( ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE) in animals. The aim of this phase I trial is to assess the safety and toxicity profile of ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE in patients with liver metastases.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The HEPAR study (Holmium Embolization Particles for Arterial Radiotherapy) is a non-randomized, open label, safety study. We aim to include 15 to 24 patients with liver metastases of any origin, who have chemotherapy-refractory disease and who are not amenable to surgical resection. Prior to treatment, in addition to the standard technetium-99m labelled macroaggregated albumin ( ^99mTc-MAA) dose, a low radioactive safety dose of 60-mg ¹⁶⁶Ho-PLLA-MS will be administered. Patients are treated in 4 cohorts of 3-6 patients, according to a standard dose escalation protocol (20 Gy, 40 Gy, 60 Gy, and 80 Gy, respectively). The primary objective will be to establish the maximum tolerated radiation dose of ¹⁶⁶Ho-PLLA-MS. Secondary objectives are to assess tumour response, biodistribution, performance status, quality of life, and to compare the ¹⁶⁶Ho-PLLA-MS safety dose and the ^99mTc-MAA dose distributions with respect to the ability to accurately predict microsphere distribution.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This will be the first clinical study on ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE. Based on preclinical studies, it is expected that ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE has a safety and toxicity profile comparable to that of ⁹⁰Y-RE. The biochemical and radionuclide characteristics of ¹⁶⁶Ho-PLLA-MS that enable accurate dosimetry calculations and biodistribution assessment may however improve the overall safety of the procedure.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01031784</p

Prospective comparative study of MRI including diffusion-weighted images versus FDG PET-CT for the detection of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas after (chemo)radiotherapy

Objective: This prospective study aims to test if MRI including diffusion weighted images can replace FDG PET-CT in the diagnosis of patients with suspicion of local recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas after (chemo)radiation. Methods: Seventy-five patients suspected of local recurrence underwent a MRI and a FDG PET-CT. Qualitative assessment of the images was performed. Reference standard was the results of biopsy or the absence of a recurrence during follow up. Results: Seventy patients were included. Fifty percent had local recurrence. FDG PET-CT had accuracy of 71% compared to 73% for MRI. The sensitivity and specificity were 97% compared to 69% and 46% compared to 77% for FDG PET-CT and MRI respectively. Conclusions: MRI showed similar diagnostic accuracy, superior specificity but inferior sensitivity compared to FDG PET-CT. Based on current results, we consider MRI including diffusion weighted sequences unable to replace FDG PET-CT as a single imaging modality when local recurrent disease of HNSCC after (C)RT is suspected

Interobserver agreement of interim and end-of-treatment18F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma : Impact on clinical practice and trials

We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of interim PET (I-PET) and end-of-treatment PET (EoT-PET) using the Deauville score (DS) in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods: I-PET and EoT-PET scans of DLBCL patients were performed in the HOVON84 study (2007–2012), an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients received R-CHOP14 and were randomized to receive rituximab intensification in the first 4 cycles or not. I-PET was performed after 4 cycles (for observational purposes), and EoT-PET after 6 or 8 cycles. Two independent central reviewers retrospectively scored all scans according to the DS system, masked to clinical outcomes. Results were dichotomized as negative (DS of 1–3) or positive (DS of 4–5). Besides percentage overall agreement (OA), we calculated agreement for positive and negative scores, expressed as positive agreement (PA) and negative agreement (NA), respectively. Results: 465 I-PET and 457 EoT-PET scans were centrally reviewed; baseline18F-FDG PET or PET/CT was available in 75%–77%, and CT in the remaining cases. Percentage OA for I-PET and EoT-PET were 87.7% and 91.7% (P 5 0.049), with NA of 92.0% and 95.0% (P 5 0.091), and PA of 73.7% and 76.3% (P 5 0.656), respectively. Conclusion: Interobserver agreement using DS in DLBCL patients in I-PET and EoT-PET yields high OA and NA. The lower PA suggests that EoT-PET/CT treatment evaluation in daily practice and I-PET–adapted trials may benefit from dual reads and central review, respectively

Interobserver agreement of interim and end-of-treatment F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): impact on clinical practice and trials

We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of interim PET (I-PET) and end-of-treatment PET (EoT-PET) using the Deauville score (DS) in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods: I-PET and EoT-PET scans of DLBCL patients were performed in the HOVON84 study (2007–2012), an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients received R-CHOP14 and were randomized to receive rituximab intensification in the first 4 cycles or not. I-PET was performed after 4 cycles (for observational purposes), and EoT-PET after 6 or 8 cycles. Two independent central reviewers retrospectively scored all scans according to the DS system, masked to clinical outcomes. Results were dichotomized as negative (DS of 1–3) or positive (DS of 4–5). Besides percentage overall agreement (OA), we calculated agreement for positive and negative scores, expressed as positive agreement (PA) and negative agreement (NA), respectively. Results: 465 I-PET and 457 EoT-PET scans were centrally reviewed; baseline18F-FDG PET or PET/CT was available in 75%–77%, and CT in the remaining cases. Percentage OA for I-PET and EoT-PET were 87.7% and 91.7% (P 5 0.049), with NA of 92.0% and 95.0% (P 5 0.091), and PA of 73.7% and 76.3% (P 5 0.656), respectively. Conclusion: Interobserver agreement using DS in DLBCL patients in I-PET and EoT-PET yields high OA and NA. The lower PA suggests that EoT-PET/CT treatment evaluation in daily practice and I-PET–adapted trials may benefit from dual reads and central review, respectively

Interobserver agreement of interim and end-of-treatment F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): impact on clinical practice and trials

We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of interim PET (I-PET) and end-of-treatment PET (EoT-PET) using the Deauville score (DS) in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods: I-PET and EoT-PET scans of DLBCL patients were performed in the HOVON84 study (2007–2012), an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients received R-CHOP14 and were randomized to receive rituximab intensification in the first 4 cycles or not. I-PET was performed after 4 cycles (for observational purposes), and EoT-PET after 6 or 8 cycles. Two independent central reviewers retrospectively scored all scans according to the DS system, masked to clinical outcomes. Results were dichotomized as negative (DS of 1–3) or positive (DS of 4–5). Besides percentage overall agreement (OA), we calculated agreement for positive and negative scores, expressed as positive agreement (PA) and negative agreement (NA), respectively. Results: 465 I-PET and 457 EoT-PET scans were centrally reviewed; baseline18F-FDG PET or PET/CT was available in 75%–77%, and CT in the remaining cases. Percentage OA for I-PET and EoT-PET were 87.7% and 91.7% (P 5 0.049), with NA of 92.0% and 95.0% (P 5 0.091), and PA of 73.7% and 76.3% (P 5 0.656), respectively. Conclusion: Interobserver agreement using DS in DLBCL patients in I-PET and EoT-PET yields high OA and NA. The lower PA suggests that EoT-PET/CT treatment evaluation in daily practice and I-PET–adapted trials may benefit from dual reads and central review, respectively

Treatment of patients with MYC rearrangement positive large B-cell lymphoma with R-CHOP plus lenalidomide:results of a multicenter phase II HOVON trial

Patients with MYC-rearrangement positive large B-cell lymphoma (MYC+ LBCL) have an inferior prognosis following standard first-line therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) compared to patients withoutMYC rearrangement. Although intensive chemotherapy regimens yield higher remission rates, toxicity remains a concern. Lenalidomide is an oral immunomodulatory drug which downregulates MYC and its target genes thereby providing support using lenalidomide as additional therapeutic option for MYC+ LBCL. A phase II trial was conducted evaluating the efficacy of lenalidomide (15 mg day 1-14) in combination with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) in newly diagnosed MYC+ LBCL patients identified through a nationwide MYCFISH screening program. The primary endpoint was complete metabolic response (CMR) on centrally reviewed F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computer tomography (CT)-scan at end-of-treatment. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and event-free survival (EFS). Eighty-two patients with stage II-IV MYC+ LBCL were treated with six cycles of R2CHOP. At end of treatment, 67% (95% Confidence interval [CI]: 58-75) of the patients reached CMR. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, 2-year estimates for OS, DFS, EFS were 73% (95% CI: 62-82), 75% (95% CI: 63-84) and 63% change to: (95% CI: 52-73) respectively. In this prospective trial for newly diagnosed MYC+ LBCL patients, we found that administering R2CHOP was safe, and yields comparable CMR and survival rates as in studies applying more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Hence, these findings offer new prospects for MYC+ LBCL patients and warrant comparison in prospective randomized clinical trials. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu (#2014-002654-39).</p

Treatment of patients with MYC rearrangement positive large B-cell lymphoma with R-CHOP plus lenalidomide:results of a multicenter HOVON phase II trial

atients with MYC-rearrangement positive large B-cell lymphoma (MYC+ LBCL) have an inferior prognosis following standard first-line therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) compared to patients without MYC rearrangement. Although intensive chemotherapy regimens yield higher remission rates, toxicity remains a concern. Lenalidomide is an oral immunomodulatory drug which downregulates MYC and its target genes thereby providing support using lenalidomide as additional therapeutic option for MYC+ LBCL. A phase II trial was conducted evaluating the efficacy of lenalidomide (15 mg day 1-14) in combination with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) in newly diagnosed MYC+ LBCL patients identified through a nationwide MYCFISH screening program. The primary endpoint was complete metabolic response (CMR) on centrally reviewed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computer tomography (CT)-scan at end-of-treatment. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and event-free survival (EFS). Eighty-two patients with stage II-IV MYC+ LBCL were treated with six cycles of R2CHOP. At end of treatment, 67% (95% Confidence interval [CI]: 58-75) of the patients reached CMR. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, 2-year estimates for OS, DFS, EFS were 73% (95% CI: 62-82), 75% (95% CI: 63-84) and 63% change to: (95% CI: 52-73) respectively. In this prospective trial for newly diagnosed MYC+ LBCL patients, we found that administering R2CHOP was safe, and yields comparable CMR and survival rates as in studies applying more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Hence, these findings offer new prospects for MYC+ LBCL patients and warrant comparison in prospective randomized clinical trials. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu (#2014-002654-39)