47 research outputs found

    Microbial Communities and Interactions of Nitrogen Oxides With Methanogenesis in Diverse Peatlands of the Amazon Basin

    Get PDF
    Tropical peatlands are hotspots of methane (CH4) production but present high variation and emission uncertainties in the Amazon region. This is because the controlling factors of methane production in tropical peats are not yet well documented. Although inhibitory effects of nitrogen oxides (NOx) on methanogenic activity are known from pure culture studies, the role of NOx in the methane cycling of peatlands remains unexplored. Here, we investigated the CH4 content, soil geochemistry and microbial communities along 1-m-soil profiles and assessed the effects of soil NOx and nitrous oxide (N2O) on methanogenic abundance and activity in three peatlands of the Pastaza-Marañón foreland basin. The peatlands were distinct in pH, DOC, nitrate pore water concentrations, C/N ratios of shallow soils, redox potential, and 13C enrichment in dissolved inorganic carbon and CH4 pools, which are primarily contingent on H2-dependent methanogenesis. Molecular 16S rRNA and mcrA gene data revealed diverse and novel methanogens varying across sites. Importantly, we also observed a strong stratification in relative abundances of microbial groups involved in NOx cycling, along with a concordant stratification of methanogens. The higher relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (Thaumarchaeota) in acidic oligotrophic peat than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (Nitrospira) is noteworthy as putative sources of NOx. Experiments testing the interaction of NOx species and methanogenesis found that the latter showed differential sensitivity to nitrite (up to 85% reduction) and N2O (complete inhibition), which would act as an unaccounted CH4 control in these ecosystems. Overall, we present evidence of diverse peatlands likely differently affected by inhibitory effects of nitrogen species on methanogens as another contributor to variable CH4 fluxes. © Copyright © 2021 Buessecker, Zamora, Sarno, Finn, Hoyt, van Haren, Urquiza Muñoz and Cadillo-Quiroz.Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

    Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Interventions for Elevated Depressive Symptoms in Adults Diagnosed With Cancer

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at increased risk for depression compared with individuals with no cancer diagnosis, yet few interventions target depressed cancer patients. METHODS: Efficacy of psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic interventions for depression in cancer patients who met an entry threshold for depressive symptoms was examined by meta-analysis. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed to identify randomized controlled trials meeting the selection criteria. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges’ g and were pooled to compare pre- and postrandomization depressive symptoms with a random effects model. Subgroup analyses tested moderators of effect sizes, such as comparison of different intervention modalities, with a mixed effects model. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials (six psychotherapeutic and four pharmacologic studies) met the selection criteria; 1362 participants with mixed cancer types and stages had been randomly assigned to treatment groups. One outlier trial was removed from analyses. The random effects model showed interventions to be superior to control conditions on reducing depressive symptoms postintervention (Hedges’ g = 0.43, 95% confidence interval = 0.30 to 0.56, P < .001). In the four psychotherapeutic trials with follow-up assessment, interventions were more effective than control conditions up to 12–18 months after patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (P < .001). Although each approach was more effective than the control conditions in improving depressive symptoms (P < .001), subgroup analyses showed that cognitive behavioral therapy appeared more effective than problem-solving therapy (P = .01), but not more effective than pharmacologic intervention (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that psychological and pharmacologic approaches can be targeted productively toward cancer patients with elevated depressive symptoms. Research is needed to maximize effectiveness, accessibility, and integration into clinical care of interventions for depressed cancer patients

    Unifying the identification of biomedical entities with the Bioregistry

    No full text
    The standardized identification of biomedical entities is a cornerstone of interoperability, reuse, and data integration in the life sciences. Several registries have been developed to catalog resources maintaining identifiers for biomedical entities such as small molecules, proteins, cell lines, and clinical trials. However, existing registries have struggled to provide sufficient coverage and metadata standards that meet the evolving needs of modern life sciences researchers. Here, we introduce the Bioregistry, an integrative, open, community-driven metaregistry that synthesizes and substantially expands upon 23 existing registries. The Bioregistry addresses the need for a sustainable registry by leveraging public infrastructure and automation, and employing a progressive governance model centered around open code and open data to foster community contribution. The Bioregistry can be used to support the standardized annotation of data, models, ontologies, and scientific literature, thereby promoting their interoperability and reuse. The Bioregistry can be accessed through https://bioregistry.io and its source code and data are available under the MIT and CC0 Licenses at https://github.com/biopragmatics/bioregistry. © 2022, The Author(s).Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]
    corecore