Pseudo-wound infection after a caesarean section:Case report of unrecognized Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Background: Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG) is a rare auto-inflammatory disease, characterized by painful ulcerative skin-lesions often developing at sites of injury or surgery because of the typical pathergy phenomena. We describe an unusual case of PG after a caesarean section with excessive extra-cutaneous manifestation within internal organs. Presentation of case: A 21-year-old Dutch primigravida developed signs of sepsis after a caesarean section. Despite antibiotic treatment, fast clinical deterioration occurred. Exploration of the wound showed necrosis of the uterus and surrounding tissues. Due to the progression of necrosis, consecutive debridement procedures were executed resulting in a substantial abdominal wall defect. The progressive clinical course of the necrosis combined with absence of positive wound cultures and histology of prominent interstitial neutrophilic infiltration, led to the diagnosis ‘Pyoderma Gangrenosum’. Treatment with high dose corticosteroids led to rapid regression of the disease. After several weeks, the abdominal wall defect was surgically corrected under systemic corticosteroid therapy. Discussion: This case of PG is unique due to the excessive extra-cutaneous presentation, which contributed to delayed diagnosis. Several surgical interventions in the active stage of disease resulted in expansion of PG and substantial morbidity for the patient. Conclusion: Post-operative PG can mimic infectious diseases, but treatment is substantially different. This case of extensive PG highlights the importance of timely recognition and treatment of the disease to reduce iatrogenic morbidity

Assessment of Diagnostic Strategy for Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

IMPORTANCE: An accurate diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is essential to reduce diagnostic and therapeutic delay. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of direct immunofluorescence microscopy on mucosal biopsy specimens and immunoserology in a large cohort of patients with suspected MMP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in a single tertiary care center for blistering diseases between January 2002 and March 2019. Eligible participants were patients with suspected MMP and paired data on at least a mucosal biopsy specimen for direct immunofluorescence microscopy (DIF) and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (IIF) on a human salt-split skin substrate (SSS). In addition, an optional DIF test on a skin biopsy specimen and one or more performed routine immunoserologic tests were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from April 2019, to June 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy of DIF, IIF SSS, and immunoblot for BP180 and BP230. RESULTS: Of the 787 participants, 121 (15.4%) received the diagnosis of MMP (50 men [41.3%], 71 women [58.7%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.1 [17.7] years). Sixty-seven of the patients with MMP (55.4%) had monosite involvement, of which oral site was the most frequently affected (51 [42.1%]). No significant difference was found between the sensitivity of DIF on a perilesional buccal biopsy and a normal buccal biopsy (89.3% vs 76.7%). Three patients with solitary ocular involvement showed a positive DIF of only the oral mucosa. In 6 patients with a negative mucosal DIF, a skin biopsy confirmed diagnosis of MMP. Overall, IIF SSS was less sensitive (44.6%), but highly specific (98.9%). The sensitivity of immunoblot (66.1%) was higher compared to SSS, but with lower specificity (91.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This comparative diagnostic accuracy study of a cohort of 787 patients found a high sensitivity of a mucosal DIF biopsy for diagnosis of MMP, and lower sensitivity of serologic analysis. A biopsy can be taken from either perilesional or normal buccal mucosa. An additional DIF biopsy of another mucosal site or of affected or unaffected skin may increase the diagnostic yield and is recommended in patients with negative DIF results and high clinical suspicion

Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for Anti-Laminin 332 Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

Anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by predominant mucosal lesions and autoantibodies against laminin 332. The exact diagnosis of anti-laminin 332 MMP is important since nearly 30% of patients develop solid cancers. This study compared two independently developed diagnostic indirect immunofluorescence (IF) tests based on recombinant laminin 332 expressed in HEK239 cells (biochip mosaic assay) and the migration trails of cultured keratinocytes rich in laminin 332 (footprint assay). The sera of 54 anti-laminin 332 MMP, 35 non-anti-laminin 332 MMP, and 30 pemphigus vulgaris patients as well as 20 healthy blood donors were analyzed blindly and independently. Fifty-two of 54 and 54/54 anti-laminin 332 MMP sera were positive in the biochip mosaic and the footprint assay, respectively. In the 35 non-anti-laminin 332 MMP sera, 3 were positive in both tests and 4 others showed weak reactivity in the footprint assay. In conclusion, both assays are easy to perform, highly sensitive, and specific, which will further facilitate the diagnosis of anti-laminin 332 MMP

Frequency and prognosis of associated malignancies in 504 patients with lymphomatoid papulosis

Background: Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) can be associated with other haematological malignancies (HM), but reported percentages vary from 20% to over 50%. Objective: To evaluate the frequency and prognostic significance of associated HM and non-HM in LyP patients. Methods: In this multicentre cohort study, the complete Dutch LyP population was included from the Dutch Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry between 1985 and 2018. Clinical and histopathological information was retrieved from every individual patient. Results: After a median follow-up of 120 months (range, 6–585), an associated HM was observed in 78/504 (15.5%) patients. Most common associated HM were mycosis fungoides (MF; n = 31) and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL; n = 29), while 19 patients had another HM of B-cell (n = 14) or myeloid origin (n = 5). Even after a 25-year follow-up period, percentages of associated HM did not exceed 20%. Thirty-nine of 465 patients (8.4%) without a prior or concurrent associated HM developed an associated HM during follow-up, after a median of 68 months (range of 3–286 months). Nine of 78 patients died of associated HM, including 6/22 patients developing extracutaneous ALCL, while all patients with associated MF or skin-limited ALCL had an excellent prognosis. Compared with the general population, LyP patients showed an increased risk (relative risk, 2.8; 95% confidence intervals, 2.4–3.3) for non-HM, in particular cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma and intestinal/lung/bladder cancer. Conclusions: An associated HM was reported in 15.5% of the LyP patients, particularly MF and ALCL. Although the frequency of associated HM is lower than suggested and the prognosis of most patients with associated HM is excellent, a small subgroup will develop aggressive disease, in particular extracutaneous ALCL. Furthermore, LyP patients have a higher risk of developing other malignancies. Clinicians should be aware of these risks, and LyP patients require close monitoring

Outcomes of rare patients with a primary cutaneous CD30(+) lymphoproliferative disorder developing extracutaneous disease

Contains fulltext : 218224.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access