Frozen embryo transfer: Endometrial preparation by letrozole versus hormone replacement cycle: A randomized clinical trial

Background: The endometrial preparation with stimulating natural cycles for frozen embryo transfer (FET) have benefits like lower cost and ease of use. Objective: Comparing the clinical outcome of letrozole versus hormone replacement (HR) for endometrial preparation in women with normal menstrual cycles for FET in artificial reproduction techniques. Materials and Methods: A total of 167 participants who had frozen embryos and regular ovulatory cycles were randomly divided into two groups for endometrial preparation. One group (82 women) was stimulated with letrozole 5mg/day and the other group (85 women) was hormonally stimulated by oral estradiol valerate (2 mg three times a day). All participants were followed serially by ultrasonography. Any patient who did not reach optimal endometrial thickness was excluded from the study. Implantation, biochemical and clinical pregnancy and abortion rate were reported. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean age, duration, and primary or secondary infertility, cause of the infertility, number, and quality of transferred embryos between the groups. The mean estradiol level on the day of transfer was 643 ± 217 in the HR group and 547 ± 212 in the letrozole group (P = 0.01), which was significantly different. The clinical pregnancy rate was 38.7 in the letrozole group, higher than the HR group (25.3) but not significantly different (P=0.06). Conclusion: For endometrial preparation in women with a normal cycle, letrozole yields higher pregnancy rate although it is not significant; due to its cost, ease in use, and lower side effects, letrozole is a good choice. Key words: Letrozole, Hormone replacement, Endometrial, Preparation, Frozen, Embryo

The effect of endocervical and catheter bacterial colonisation during in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) on IVF success rate among asymptomatic women: a longitudinal prospective study

The adverse effects of bacterial contamination during in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) have been studied previously. However, data on asymptomatic women with positive bacterial culture and their IVF outcome are lacking. This prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 74 women undergoing IVF-ET, of whom specimens from the endocervix and ET catheter were taken and sent to a laboratory for microbiological assessment. Then, patients were followed up for evaluation of chemical pregnancy (β-HCG > 25 mIU/mL) and clinical pregnancy (detected foetal heartbeat). The findings revealed that there was no significant difference in terms of biochemical (35.4% vs. 19.2%, p= .116) and clinical pregnancy rate (25.0% vs. 15.4%, p= .257) among ET catheter culture positive and negative women. This finding allows us to conclude that the positive culture in the absence of clinical signs of infection may not increase the risk of implantation failure.Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? There is growing evidence indicating that endometritis may decrease the endometrial receptiveness in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles; however, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding IVF outcomes when the bacterial culture of embryo transfer (ET) catheter is positive. What the results of this study add? The present study demonstrates that positive ET catheter culture in asymptomatic women does not increase the risk of IVF failure. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Positive-culture, per se, may not be associated with poor IVF outcomes and further studies should be undertaken on this topic in various clinical settings using different protocols