79 research outputs found

    Una nueva estrategia para mejorar los sistemas de producción de doble propósito en los trópicos: el Consorcio Tropileche

    Get PDF

    Feeding systems with forage legumes to intensify dairy production in Latin America and the Caribbean: a project executed by the Tropileche Consortium

    Get PDF

    Scattering properties of Venus' surface

    Get PDF
    Radar backscatter functions Sigma-(carat)(sub 0)(phi) for incidence angles between 0 less than or equal to phi less than or equal to 4-10 deg were derived from Magellan altimetry radar echoes. The procedure includes constrained solution of a system of simultaneous equations for which the echo-spectrum and echo time profile are inputs. A practical and workable set of constraints was applied; optimization and improved results are expected as the analysis matures. The scattering functions yield information on small-scale surface structures (tens of centimeters to tens of meters) but averaged over hundreds of sq km. RMS surface slopes derived from fits of analytic functions to the Sigma-(carat)(sub 0)(phi) results were converted to map form and show patterns similar to those reported using other techniques. While all three forms are found on Venus, fit residuals imply that an exponential scattering function matches data better than either the Hagfors or Gaussian form in most areas, although the Hagfors function may be a better descriptor at some sites. Limited study of image data indicates that average backscatter cross section, and possibly its slope, can be derived at oblique angles (17 deg less than or equal to phi less than or equal to 45 deg). Offsets of the echo peak in altimetry spectra are surprisingly common and are loosely correlated with Venus topography, but no cause for this phenomenon was identified

    Adoption of \u3ci\u3eBrachiaria\u3c/i\u3e Grasses in Mexico and Central America: A Successful Story

    Get PDF
    In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) there has been a major effort to develop new pastures technologies, to increase livestock productivity for the extensive systems prevailing in the tropical lowlands. This multi-national and inter-institutional effort was initiated through the International Network for the Evaluation of Tropical Pastures (RIEPT, by its name in Spanish), which operated from 1976 to 1996 under CIAT leadership. This network became a platform for institutions to train technicians, share forage material from existing gene banks, study the behaviour of new germplasm under different environments, and established the exchange of scientific information to extrapolate research results (Toledo, 1982). Six hundred and forty five agronomists from 24 countries in LAC were trained by RIEPT, in subjects related to forage agronomy and pasture evaluation. Training was key for the success of RIEPT, because these professionals carried out evaluations of new and improved forages under contrasting ecosystems and provided feedback. In addition, during this period participating institutions in RIEPT released 11 selected grasses as commercial cultivars, most of them from the Brachiaria genus, as well as 16 forage legume cultivars (CIAT, 2003). In Central America and Mexico these cultivars were released between 1990 and 1996. Forage evaluation activities in this region continues at present through a joint research agenda between CIAT and ILRI, as well as between CIAT and the private seed sector. Of all pasture cultivars released; grasses from the Brachiaria genus currently dominate the market – accounting for approximately 84% of all grass seed sales in Mexico and Honduras, 90% in Nicaragua, 85% in Costa Rica, and 97% in Panama during the last 5 years (Holmann et al., 2004). The objective of this paper is to estimate the impact of the adoption of Brachiaria grasses released through RIEPT during the period 1990-2003 on milk and beef production and to describe how this was achieved

    Impact from the Adoption of improved Forages in smallholder farms in Central America

    Get PDF

    Impacto de la adopción de forrajes mejorados en fincas de pequeños productores en Centroamérica

    Get PDF

    Impacto de la adopción de pastos Brachiaria: Centroamérica y México

    Get PDF

    The beef chain in Costa Rica: Identifying critical issues for promoting its modernization, efficiency and competitiveness

    Get PDF
    The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the economic agents of the chain and their commercial and legal relationships; (2) identify the articulations between links, technological levels, indicators of efficiency, installed capacity (scale), and degrees of occupation; (3) characterize and estimate the costing and pricing structures, and the generation of value in different links of the chain; (4) identify those critical costs that can be modified through technological interventions, policy, or other activity; (5) determine the biological and economic risk factors throughout the chain; and (6) develop a methodology to identify and estimate the costs and benefits in each segment and evaluate the generation of value throughout the beef chain. Data at the farm level was obtained from a national livestock survey (CORFOGA 2005b), which provided data on production systems, inventories, productivity, culling, and labor. In addition, surveys were carried out in different segments: (1) auction houses, (2) slaughterhouses, (3) butcher shops, and (4) supermarkets. The aim of these surveys was to describe behavior, determine risks and costs, and identify problems. The weak dynamics of livestock production in Costa Rica are reflected in unsatisfactory productivity indicators. The annual gross income was estimated as US44/haforcow−calfoperations,44/ha for cow-calf operations, 126/ha for dual purpose (including income from milk sales), and 135/haforfatteningactivities.Suchincomeratesareconsideredextremelylow,ifoneusesasreferencethecommercialvalueoflandallocatedtolivestockproduction(rangingbetween135/ha for fattening activities. Such income rates are considered extremely low, if one uses as reference the commercial value of land allocated to livestock production (ranging between 1000 and 2000/ha).Theaforementionedbiologicalinefficiencies,combinedwithhighlandcosts,impedetherecoveryofopportunitycostsforthecapitalinvestedinland,thusmakingbeefproductionuncompetitive.Thecow−calfoperation,withitslowproductivity,remuneratesfamilylaborwithwagesbelowthelegalminimum.Ontheassumptionthattheonlycashcostisthatoflabor,cow−calffarmspayfamilyworkersatawagethatisequivalentto602000/ha). The aforementioned biological inefficiencies, combined with high land costs, impede the recovery of opportunity costs for the capital invested in land, thus making beef production uncompetitive. The cow-calf operation, with its low productivity, remunerates family labor with wages below the legal minimum. On the assumption that the only cash cost is that of labor, cow-calf farms pay family workers at a wage that is equivalent to 60% of the legal minimum. Auctions present relatively good profits per event. However, when these profits are analyzed on a calendar-day basis, they are unattractive because of the low use of installed capacity. One strategy that would usefully improve the efficiency of the auction system in Costa Rica is its integration to reduce the number of fixed operational costs or encourage sharing of these houses so that administrative and operational personnel are rotated among the several existing auctions, taking advantage of the fact that they differ in their days of operation. This scheme would help reduce fixed costs and the commission collected without affecting profits, thus improving efficiency in this link of the chain. However, this option is not easy to implement, as auctions are run by private operators, whose various interests do not always coincide. The industrial sector formed by rural and industrial slaughterhouses shows a low occupation of installed capacity, resulting in high operational costs and low labor efficiency. The total operational costs of slaughtering and dressing are estimated as being between US32 and 66peranimal.Iftheestimatedunitcostsarecomparedwiththerateschargedperslaughteredanimal(between66 per animal. If the estimated unit costs are compared with the rates charged per slaughtered animal (between 15 and 23),thenwehavetoconcludethatruralslaughterhousesworkatalossandthatindustrialslaughterhousescovertheiroperationalcostswithprocessingservicesandtheverysmallprofitmarginsfromsalesofbyproducts.Thebestperformanceintermsofefficiencyandprofitabilityisfoundintheretailsectorofbutchersandsupermarkets.Therateofprofits,expressedasthefractionofthefinalpricepaidbytheconsumerthatremainsinthebutcher’shandsasremunerationofhiswork,rangeswidelybetween323), then we have to conclude that rural slaughterhouses work at a loss and that industrial slaughterhouses cover their operational costs with processing services and the very small profit margins from sales of byproducts. The best performance in terms of efficiency and profitability is found in the retail sector of butchers and supermarkets. The rate of profits, expressed as the fraction of the final price paid by the consumer that remains in the butcher’s hands as remuneration of his work, ranges widely between 3% and 40%, with an average of 32%. If these profit rates are compared with those of other retail businesses, which are about 8%, then this type of activity presents excellent profit margins with relatively low risk. If, in addition, we take into account that this sector also offers the consumer a broad range of meat cuts from other animals such as pork and chicken, and processed meats, then profit margins are still higher. The value generated throughout the chain, as a percentage of the final value of the young steer at retail price according to activity, is distributed as follows: fattener (34%), retailer (33%), breeder (19%), slaughterhouse (7%), transporter (6%), and auction house (1%). As observed, the distribution of value throughout the beef chain is totally inequitable and incongruent with the level of individual risk confronted by the actors who form it. The inequity observed in the distribution of added value reflects a clear dominant position in the market of some actors of the chain, which enables them to capture a very high fraction of the profits. The value generated in the chain, adjusted for operational time in each link, ranges between US0.28/animal per day for the breeder and $45.85/animal per day for the butcher. Thus, the highest proportion of the total added value concentrates on the final link of the chain. The butcher or supermarket obtains, on the basis of one animal in the same unit of time, 164 times more value that the breeder located in the first link of the chain. The latter has to confront biological and economic risks not covered by insurance policies, whereas retailers may mitigate risks through insurance policies for their raw materials, equipment, and infrastructure. The competitiveness of the beef chain is the aggregate of the efficiency and productivity of all the links that form it. In a situation where, in the final segment, the demand for beef is low and weakly dynamic, then economic signs of modernization and the technological change it promotes, are not being generated in other components of the chain, particularly in the first link of production. This, in turn, results in a vicious cycle, generating low productivity and lack of competitiveness. To promote technological change, efficiency, and competitiveness in the value chain for beef in Costa Rica, we propose the following six recommendations: 1. That successful experiences of other chains such as that of poultry be analyzed and learned from to identify strategies that would increase the efficiency of the beef chain as a whole. 2. That strategies for promoting the milk production of breeding cows be developed to increase family income, as remuneration of labor is currently below the minimum wage. This option would be viable only in localities where a milk market exists. That livestock producer funds [a livestock producer fund consists of granting livestock in company to produce meat, provided that the producer concerned has adequate pastures for this purpose on his farm] be created as mechanisms to develop social capital, reduce transaction costs, and help improve the chain’s productivity and profitability. These organizations would bring together the different classes of the chain and favor synergies in the interaction of public and private actors. 3. That incentives be created to promote the large-scale adoption of already available improved forage species, as most of the problem of low livestock productivity originates in poor and deficient feed. This strategy would emphasize feeding during dry seasons, thereby minimizing seasonal weight losses in the national herd and improving the profitability of farms. 4. That a carcass classification system be established, based on quality and price that would permit differentiating supplies for different segments of the market. 5. That consumer education be promoted on the health benefits of beef, forms of preparation, and differentiating between cuts, uses, and qualities of beef products
    • …
    corecore