Shaping innovation and coordination of healthcare delivery across boundaries and borders : A comparative case study

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Real-world evidence of TNF inhibition in axial spondyloarthritis : can we generalise the results from clinical trials?

Funding This work was supported by the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) who funded the BSRBR-AS. The BSR received funding for this from Pfizer, AbbVie and UCB. These companies receive advance copies of manuscripts for comments but have no input in to the topics for analysis in the register nor the work involved in undertaking analysis. Analysis of data was supported by the Versus Arthritis/Medical Research Council Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work (grant number 20665).Peer reviewedPostprin

Outcomes and treatment responses, including work productivity, among people with axial spondyloarthritis living in urban and rural areas : a mixed-methods study within a national register

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to the staff of the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis register who at the time of the study were Elizabeth Ferguson-Jones, Maureen Heddle, Nafeesa Nazlee and Barry Morris, and to the recruiting staff at the clinical centres, details of which are available at: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/iahs/research/epidemiology/spondyloarthritis.php#panel1011. FUNDING The BSRBR-AS is funded by the British Society of Rheumatology who have received funding for this, in part, from Pfizer, Abbvie and UCB. These companies receive advance copies of results but have no input in determining the topics for analysis or work involved in undertaking it. This work was conducted within the Versus Arthritis/Medical Research Council Centre for Musculoskeletal Work and Health (Grant No: 20665).Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The role of metrology in axSpA : does it provide unique information in assessing patients and predicting outcome? Results from the BSRBR-AS registry

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the staff who contributed to running the BSRBR-AS register and we also thank the recruiting staff at the clinical centers, details of which are available at: www.abdn.ac.uk/bsrbr-as.Peer reviewedPostprin

Comparing the impact of symptoms and health care experiences of people who have and have not received a diagnosis of fibromyalgia: A cross‐sectional survey within the PACFiND study

Objective: To compare the impact of symptoms and health care utilization of people diagnosed with fibromyalgia, people who fulfill the criteria but are not diagnosed, and people with chronic pain. Methods: We recruited people who had participated in a previous population survey across Scotland and who reported some typical fibromyalgia symptoms or had received a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Responses to a postal questionnaire were used to define mutually exclusive groups: people who had a fibromyalgia diagnosis, who met criteria for fibromyalgia, and who had chronic pain. Results: Participants included 85 people with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia, 110 who met criteria for fibromyalgia, and 133 with chronic pain. The mean age across groups ranged 57–59 years, but the percentage female varied markedly: 86%, 64%, and 67%, respectively. Compared to those with chronic pain, participants with a fibromyalgia diagnosis were more likely to be out of employment due to health. An average of 3 years was needed to receive a fibromyalgia diagnosis, and more than half were diagnosed in secondary care (most commonly rheumatology). The fibromyalgia diagnosis and criteria groups were similar in terms of symptom impact, quality of life, and life satisfaction but were worse than the chronic pain group. Participants who had received a diagnosis of fibromyalgia reported the poorest health care experiences. Conclusion: An urgent need exists for a model of care for fibromyalgia to ensure prompt diagnosis, access to evidence‐based care, and long‐term support, with the aim of improving function. The data suggest that diagnosis in men may be overlooked, and this finding warrants further study

Characterization of Preoperative, Postsurgical, Acute and Chronic Pain in High Risk Breast Cancer Patients

Funding: The Ketorolac in Breast Cancer trial has been supported by the Anticancer Fund, the Belgian Society of Anaesthesia and Resuscitation, the Fondation Saint-Luc, and the Commission du Patrimoine of the Université catholique de Louvain, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc. Acknowledgments: Membership of the KBCt Group, Aline van Maanen, Gauthier Bouche, Alain Dekleermaker, Francois P Duhoux, Marc De Kock, Martine Berliere, Pierre Coulie, Jan Decloedt, Jean-Edouard Guillaume, Marc Ledent, Jean-Pascal Machiels, Véronique Mustin, Walter Swinnen, Lionel Vander Essen, and Jean-Christophe Verougstraete.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The effect of COVID19 public health restrictions on the health of people with musculoskeletal conditions and symptoms : the CONTAIN study

Funding This work was supported by Versus Arthritis [Grant Number: 20748] and the British Society for Rheumatology. The funding for the original studies included were from Versus Arthritis (MAmMOTH) and the British Society for Rheumatology (BSRBR-AS and BSR-PsA). Daniel Whibley is supported by a Versus Arthritis Foundation Fellowship [Grant Number 21742] Acknowledgements We are grateful to help from staff at the National Ankylosing Spondylitis Society and specifically to patient partners Lynne Laidlaw (for help with designing questionnaire) and Susan Davis (for commenting on the manuscript). The authors do not report any conflicts of interest. GJM conceived the idea for the study and all authors were involved in the detailed planning. MH, KK, EM-B and MB were responsible for obtaining ethics and research governance approvals. MB undertook the analysis which was independently verified by GTJ. GJM, with input from MB, drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed important intellectual content via written comments. We thank Linda Dean for comments on the manuscript. Data Availability Statement The data within the article which relate to the collection of BSR register data are owned by the BSR – access to these data are subject to application being made to the BSR: Registers (rheumatology.org.uk) . For other data in the article, application can be made for access to the data by contacting the corresponding author.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Identifying key health system components associated with improved outcomes to inform the reconfiguration of services for adults with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a mixed methods study

Background Adults with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases face unique challenges and struggles to navigate health-care systems designed to manage common conditions. Evidence to inform an optimal service framework for their care is scarce. Using systemic vasculitis as an exemplar, we aimed to identify and explain the key service components underpinning effective care for rare diseases. Methods In this mixed-methods study, data were collected as part of a survey of vasculitis service providers across the UK and Ireland, interviews with patients, and from organisational case studies to identify key service components that enable good care. The association between these components and patient outcomes (eg, serious infections, mortality) and provider outcomes (eg, emergency hospital admissions) were examined in a population-based data linkage study using routine health-care data obtained from patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis from national health datasets in Scotland. We did univariable and multivariable analyses using Bayesian poisson and negative binomial regression to estimate incident rate ratios (IRRs), and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). People with lived experiences were involved in the research and writing process. Findings Good care was characterised by service components that supported timely access to services, integrated care, and expertise. In 1420 patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis identified from national health datasets, service-reported average waiting times for new patients of less than 1 week were associated with fewer serious infections (IRR 0·70 [95% credibility interval 0·55–0·88]) and fewer emergency hospital admissions (0·78 [0·68–0·92]). Nurse-led advice lines were associated with fewer serious infections (0·76 [0·58–0·93]) and fewer emergency hospital admissions (0·85 [0·74–0·96]). Average waiting times for new patients of less than 1 week were also associated with reduced mortality (HR 0·59 [95% credibility interval 0·37–0·93]). Cohorted clinics, nurse-led clinics, and specialist vasculitis multi-disciplinary team meetings were associated with fewer serious infections (IRR 0·75 [0·59–0·96] for cohorted clinics; 0·65 [0·39–0·84] for nurse-led clinics; 0·72 [0·57–0·90] for specialist vasculitis multi-disciplinary team meetings) and emergency hospital admissions (0·81 [0·71–0·91]; 0·75 [0·65–0·94]; 0·86 [0·75–0·96]). Key components were characterised by their ability to overcome professional tensions between specialties. Interpretation Key service components associated with important health outcomes and underpinning factors were identified to inform initiatives to improve the design, delivery, and effectiveness of health-care models for rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases

A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies

NC Harvey acknowledges funding from the UK Medical Research Council (MC_PC_21003; MC_PC_21001). The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services through 75N92021D00001, 75N92021D00002, 75N92021D00003, 75N92021D00004, and 75N92021D00005. Funding for the MrOS USA study comes from the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research under the following grant numbers: U01 AG027810, U01 AG042124, U01 AG042139, U01 AG042140, U01 AG042143, U01 AG042145, U01 AG042168, U01 AR066160, and UL1 TR000128. Funding for the SOF study comes from the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), supported by grants (AG05407, AR35582, AG05394, AR35584, and AR35583). Funding for the Health ABC study was from the Intramural research program at the National Institute on Aging under the following contract numbers: NO1-AG-6–2101, NO1-AG-6–2103, and NO1-AG-6–2106.Peer reviewedPostprin

Health and work: what physicians need to know

Employment, along with education, is central to the promotion of social mobility and the reduction of health inequalities. For the most part, however, physicians have limited exposure to occupational medicine during their training and rarely receive much in the way of formal training about occupational issues except those that fall commonly within their area of specialisation. Here, we illustrate why work and good employment can be so important for health and, therefore, why it should matter to all physicians. Given that under half of the UK population have access to occupational health services through their employer, physicians should be able to recognise any harm to health caused by work, so we describe the principles of eliciting a good occupational history. There is an important relationship between unemployment and poor health which will be discussed, illustrating the importance of being able to support people with long-term conditions and disabilities to remain in work for as long as they wish to do so. Patients expect to be able to seek advice from their physician about taking time off work because of ill health, planning a return to work after sickness absence and whether or not they need to change their work status because of their health condition. Therefore, we describe the fitnote: what it is for, how to complete one well and what core principles are needed in order to give patients good advice about working