JNK interacting protein 1 (JIP-1) protects LNCaP prostate cancer cells from growth arrest and apoptosis mediated by 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)

12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) stimulates protein kinase C (PKC) which mediates apoptosis in androgen-sensitive LNCaP human prostate cancer cells. The downstream signals of PKC that mediate TPA-induced apoptosis in LNCaP cells are unclear. In this study, we found that TPA activates the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK)/c-Jun/AP-1 pathway. To explore the possible role that the JNK/c-Jun/AP-1 signal pathway has on TPA-induced apoptosis in LNCaP cells, we stably transfected the scaffold protein, JNK interacting protein 1 (JIP-1), which binds to JNK inhibiting its ability to phosphorylate c-Jun. TPA (10(-9)-10(-7) mol l(-1)) caused phosphorylation of JNK in both wild-type and JIP-1-transfected (LNCaP-JIP-1) cells. It resulted in phosphorylation and upregulation of expression of c-Jun protein in the wild-type LNCaP cells, but not in the JIP-1-transfected LNCaP cells. In addition, upregulation of AP-1 reporter activity by TPA (10(-9) mol l(-1)) occurred in LNCaP cells but was abrogated in LNCaP-JIP-1 cells. Thus, TPA stimulated c-Jun through JNK, and JIP-1 effectively blocked JNK. TPA (10(-12)-10(-8) mol l(-1)) treatment of LNCaP cells caused their growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest, upregulation of p53 and p21waf1, and induction of apoptosis. All of these effects were significantly attenuated when LNCaP-JIP-1 cells were similarly treated with TPA. A previous study showed that c-Jun/AP-1 blocked androgen receptor (AR) signaling by inhibiting AR binding to AR response elements (AREs) of target genes including prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Therefore, we hypothesised that TPA would not be able to disrupt the AR signal pathway in LNCaP-JIP-1 cells. Contrary to expectation, TPA (10(-9)-10(-8) mol l(-1)) inhibited DHT-induced AREs reporter activity and decreased levels of PSA in the LNCaP-JIP-1 cells. Taken together, TPA, probably by stimulation of PKC, phosphorylates JNK, which phosphorylates and increases expression of c-Jun leading to AP-1 activity. Growth control of prostate cancer cells can be mediated through the JNK/c-Jun pathway, but androgen responsiveness of these cells can be independent of this pathway, suggesting that androgen independence in progressive prostate cancer may not occur through activation of this pathway

Impact of primary kidney disease on the effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: secondary analyses of the EMPA-KIDNEY trial

Background: The EMPA KIDNEY trial showed that empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death in patients with chronic kidney disease mainly through slowing progression. We aimed to assess how effects of empagliflozin might differ by primary kidney disease across its broad population. Methods: EMPA-KIDNEY, a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, was conducted at 241 centres in eight countries (Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, the UK, and the USA). Patients were eligible if their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 20 to less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or 45 to less than 90 mL/min per 1·73 m2 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) of 200 mg/g or higher at screening. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to 10 mg oral empagliflozin once daily or matching placebo. Effects on kidney disease progression (defined as a sustained ≥40% eGFR decline from randomisation, end-stage kidney disease, a sustained eGFR below 10 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or death from kidney failure) were assessed using prespecified Cox models, and eGFR slope analyses used shared parameter models. Subgroup comparisons were performed by including relevant interaction terms in models. EMPA-KIDNEY is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594110. Findings: Between May 15, 2019, and April 16, 2021, 6609 participants were randomly assigned and followed up for a median of 2·0 years (IQR 1·5–2·4). Prespecified subgroupings by primary kidney disease included 2057 (31·1%) participants with diabetic kidney disease, 1669 (25·3%) with glomerular disease, 1445 (21·9%) with hypertensive or renovascular disease, and 1438 (21·8%) with other or unknown causes. Kidney disease progression occurred in 384 (11·6%) of 3304 patients in the empagliflozin group and 504 (15·2%) of 3305 patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·62–0·81]), with no evidence that the relative effect size varied significantly by primary kidney disease (pheterogeneity=0·62). The between-group difference in chronic eGFR slopes (ie, from 2 months to final follow-up) was 1·37 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (95% CI 1·16–1·59), representing a 50% (42–58) reduction in the rate of chronic eGFR decline. This relative effect of empagliflozin on chronic eGFR slope was similar in analyses by different primary kidney diseases, including in explorations by type of glomerular disease and diabetes (p values for heterogeneity all >0·1). Interpretation: In a broad range of patients with chronic kidney disease at risk of progression, including a wide range of non-diabetic causes of chronic kidney disease, empagliflozin reduced risk of kidney disease progression. Relative effect sizes were broadly similar irrespective of the cause of primary kidney disease, suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors should be part of a standard of care to minimise risk of kidney failure in chronic kidney disease. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and UK Medical Research Council

Comparable effect of tolvaptan in heart failure patients with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

Background: It is unclear that the difference in efficacy of tolvaptan (TLV) on the length of hospital stay for both heart failure (HF) preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) and reduced EF (HFrEF) patients. Methods: We investigated 369 patients who were hospitalized with HF from February 2011 to June 2016 and initiated TLV. Patients who died in hospital, transferred hospital or clinical scenario 4 or 5 were excluded. Finally, we analyzed 108 patients with HFpEF and 96 patients with HFrEF. We evaluated the relationship between the length of hospital stay and the date of TLV initiation. Moreover, we compared the early use (within the median) and delayed use (the median or later) of TLV. Results: The date of TLV initiation was statistically associated with the length of hospital stay in both HFpEF and HFrEF (HFpEF: r = 0.625, P < 0.001, HFrEF: r = 0.618, P < 0.001). In HFpEF, the length of hospital stay in delayed use group was significantly longer than the early use group (22.2 ± 10.7 days and 38.1 ± 22.6 days, P < 0.001). The result was similar in HFrEF (22.0 ± 15.0 days and 32.1 ± 22.0 days, P = 0.008). On the other hand, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay after initiation of TLV in both HFpEF and HFrEF. Other findings (including the severity of HF) were similar between the early use group and the delayed group in HFpEF and HFrEF. Conclusions: The time until TLV initiation after hospitalization was related to the length of hospital stay in HFpEF and HFrEF patients

Azelnidipine is a useful medication for the treatment of heart failure preserved ejection fraction

Background: The optimal therapy in patients with heart failure preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and hypertension (HT) has not been revealed. The beta blocker (BB) and the renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitor (RAAS-I) are recommend as class IIa in patients with HFpEF. The calcium channel blocker (CCB), a major anti-hypertensive drugs in Japan, is also recommend as class IIa in patients with HFpEF. However, the difference between azelnidipine, an L type CCB, and cilnidipine, an N type CCB, is unclear. We investigated the difference between azelnidipine and cilnidipine in patients with HFpEF and HT. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive HFpEF patients treated with BB and RAAS-I from April 2013 to March 2015 were enrolled. Initially, cilnidipine was used, and then switched to azelnidipine. Age, gender, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), blood tests, echocardiography, and cardiac-scintigraphy (123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine: MIBG) were measured before and after six months from azelnidipine administration. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in BP. B type natriuretic peptides were significantly reduced (pre-state: 195.4 ± 209.7 pg/ml and post-state: 140.7 ± 136.4 pg/ml, p = 0.050). In echocardiography, the TEI index tended to be decreased (pre-state: 0.47 ± 0.15 and post-state: 0.42 ± 0.08, p = 0.057). As for MIBG, there was no significant change in the heart/mediastinum ratio. However, the washout rate was significantly reduced (pre-state: 44.7 ± 12.2 and post-state: 40.7 ± 12.1, p = 0.011). In addition, there was no statistically significant change, although HR tended to decrease by switching to azelnidipine (pre-state: 62.7 ± 11.6 and post-state: 61.8 ± 16.5, p = 0.373). Conclusions: In patients with HT and HFpEF, azelnidipine improved the severity of HF and cardiac sympathetic nerve activity compared with cilnidipine

Bisoprolol transdermal patch improves orthostatic hypotension in patients with chronic heart failure and hypertension

β blockers (BBs) play an important role in heart failure (HF) treatment. However, orthostatic hypotension (OH) is sometimes caused by BBs. The bisoprolol transdermal patch works more slowly and is long acting compared with the bisoprolol fumarate tablet. The risk of OH may be reduced by using the bisoprolol transdermal patch. We evaluated 57 consecutive patients who were taking the bisoprolol fumarate tablet for chronic HF with hypertension from November 2016 to September 2017. We switched the patients to the bisoprolol transdermal patch. Because 12 of 57 subjects could not continue using the bisoprolol transdermal patch, we analyzed the remaining 45 patients. We investigated BP, blood tests, and changes in BP from supine to standing positions before and after 6 months of switching from tablet to patch. OH was diagnosed by observing a systolic/diastolic BP drop of at least 20/10 mmHg or an absolute systolic BP (sBP) of <90 mmHg from the standing position. No significant changes were observed in the BP and BPs from supine to standing positions, whereas log brain natriuretic peptide was significantly reduced after switching from patch to tablet (2.102 to 2.070pg/dl, P = .039). OH, which occurred in originally 17 patients, showed improvement and eventually appeared in 4 patients. In these patients, changes in BP from supine to standing positions were also significantly improved (changes in sBP, −11 to −6mmHg, P = .016). This study demonstrated that switching from the bisoprolol fumarate tablet to transdermal patch reduced the morbidity of OH in HF patients

CREB/ATF-Dependent Repression of Cyclin A by Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Protein

Expression of the human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) oncoprotein Tax is correlated with cellular transformation contributing to the development of adult T-cell leukemia. Tax has been shown to modulate the activities of several cellular promoters. Existing evidence suggests that Tax need not directly bind to DNA to accomplish these effects but rather that it can act through binding to cellular factors, including members of the CREB/ATF family. Exact mechanisms of HTLV-1 transformation of cells have yet to be fully defined, but the process is likely to include both activation of cellular-growth-promoting factors and repression of cellular tumor-suppressing functions. While transcriptional activation has been well studied, transcriptional repression by Tax, reported recently from several studies, remains less well understood. Here, we show that Tax represses the TATA-less cyclin A promoter. Repression of the cyclin A promoter was seen in both ts13 adherent cells and Jurkat T lymphocytes. Two other TATA-less promoters, cyclin D3 and DNA polymerase α, were also found to be repressed by Tax. Interestingly, all three promoters share a common feature of at least one conserved upstream CREB/ATF binding site. In electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we observed that Tax altered the formation of a complex(es) at the cyclin A promoter-derived ATF site. Functionally, we correlated removal of the CREB/ATF site from the promoter with loss of repression by Tax. Furthermore, since a Tax mutant protein which binds CREB repressed the cyclin A promoter while another mutant protein which does not bind CREB did not, we propose that this Tax repression occurs through protein-protein contact with CREB/ATF