19 research outputs found

    Is acetabular osteoplasty always required in mixed impingement?

    Full text link
    Background Mixed femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is typically managed with both femoral and acetabular rim osteoplasties, but it has not been reported if the rim osteoplasty is always required. Hypothesis/purpose We hypothesized that mixed FAI managed by femoral or combined femoral and acetabular osteoplasties will both attain satisfactory clinical results, provided intraoperative impingement-free functional motion is attained. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 30 hips (23 patients, mean age at surgery 24.3 years, mean follow-up time 1.6 years) with mixed FAI who underwent surgical dislocation of the hip and had femoral osteochondroplasty with rim trim (RT, n = 21) or no rim trim (NRT, n = 9). Physical examination results and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores were evaluated. Results Mean (±SD) WOMAC pain scores improved from 6.56 (±2.96) to 2.33 (±3.64) in the NRT group (p = .002) and from 6.86 (±4.15) to 3.86 (±3.95) in the RT group (p = .014). Function improved in both groups, but the difference was significant only for the NRT group (p < .001). Over 50 % of patients in both groups had resolution of impingement sign. Internal rotation increased from 8.6° (±11.8) to 20.0° (±10.4) in the NRT group (p = .043) and from 4.0° (±12.1) to 18.6° (±14.0) in the RT group (p < .001). Both groups had increased flexion post-operatively to normal range, but the change was only significant for the RT group (p = .02). Both groups had insignificant decreases in external rotation. Conclusion Satisfactory clinical outcomes were seen in hips with mixed impingement, regardless of whether RT was performed, provided impingement-free functional motion was attained and no severe cartilage damage was seen

    Postoperative alignment of TKA in patients with severe preoperative varus or valgus deformity: is there a difference between surgical techniques?

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background There have been conflicting studies published regarding the ability of various total knee arthroplasty (TKA) techniques to correct preoperative deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative radiographic alignment in patients with severe preoperative coronal deformity (≥10° varus/valgus) who underwent three different TKA techniques; manual instrumentation (MAN), computer navigated instrumentation (NAV) and patient specific instrumentation (PSI). Methods Patients, who received a TKA with a preoperative coronal deformity of ≥10° with available radiographs were included in this retrospective study. The groups were: MAN; n = 54, NAV; n = 52 and PSI; n = 53. The mechanical axis (varus / valgus) and the posterior tibial slope were measured and analysed using standing long leg- and lateral radiographs. Results The overall mean postoperative varus / valgus deformity was 2.8° (range, 0 to 9.9; SD 2.3) and 2.5° (range, 0 to 14.7; SD 2.3), respectively. The overall outliers (>3°) represented 30.2% (48 /159) of cases and were distributed as followed: MAN group: 31.5%, NAV group: 34.6%, PSI group: 24.4%. No significant statistical differences were found between these groups. The distribution of the severe outliers (>5°) was 14.8% in the MAN group, 23% in the NAV group and 5.6% in the PSI group. The PSI group had significantly (p = 0.0108) fewer severe outliers compared to the NAV group while all other pairs were not statistically significant. Conclusions In severe varus / valgus deformity the three surgical techniques demonstrated similar postoperative radiographic alignment. However, in reducing severe outliers (> 5°) and in achieving the planned posterior tibial slope the PSI technique for TKA may be superior to computer navigation and the conventional technique. Further prospective studies are needed to determine which technique is the best regarding reducing outliers in patients with severe preoperative coronal deformity

    Three-dimensional corrective osteotomies of mal-united clavicles-is the contralateral anatomy a reliable template for reconstruction?

    Full text link
    In computer-assisted preoperative planning of corrective osteotomies, the unaffected contralateral bone often serves as three-dimensional template for the reconstruction of mal-united bones. Before applying this approach to new anatomy such as the clavicle bone, it is important to study asymmetry between the sides. The purpose of this study was to investigate bilateral symmetry of the clavicle in healthy cadavers using three-dimensional measurement techniques. Bilateral symmetry of 102 clavicles (51 cadavers, mean age: 52.19 years, 37 male) was measured based on three-dimensional models reconstructed from computed tomography. Besides length, volume, and surface, the side-differences were evaluated by considering the mirrored left clavicle as the reconstruction template and the right clavicle as the one that will be realigned by osteotomy. The relative transformation between the aligned segments was measured to express the difference with to three-dimensional translation and rotation. The same procedure was repeated using mean-sized clavicles, one for each gender, as the template. The contralateral side was a significant more accurate reconstruction template compared to a mean-sized clavicle (P < 0.001). Nevertheless, an average side-differences with respect to rotation and translation of 8.79° ± 5.2° and 3.5 mm ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The left clavicles were significant (P = 0.001) longer with 154 mm compared to the right ones (151 mm). Three-dimensional differences between the left and right clavicles exist, but can be considered as small. Therefore, the contralateral side appears to be a reliable reconstruction template, in particular compared to a mean-sized clavicle. Clin. Anat. 28:865-871, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

    Is acetabular osteoplasty always required in mixed impingement?

    No full text
    Background: Mixed femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is typically managed with both femoral and acetabular rim osteoplasties, but it has not been reported if the rim osteoplasty is always required. Hypothesis/purpose: We hypothesized that mixed FAI managed by femoral or combined femoral and acetabular osteoplasties will both attain satisfactory clinical results, provided intraoperative impingement-free functional motion is attained. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 hips (23 patients, mean age at surgery 24.3years, mean follow-up time 1.6years) with mixed FAI who underwent surgical dislocation of the hip and had femoral osteochondroplasty with rim trim (RT, n=21) or no rim trim (NRT, n=9). Physical examination results and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores were evaluated. Results: Mean (±SD) WOMAC pain scores improved from 6.56 (±2.96) to 2.33 (±3.64) in the NRT group (p=.002) and from 6.86 (±4.15) to 3.86 (±3.95) in the RT group (p=.014). Function improved in both groups, but the difference was significant only for the NRT group (p<.001). Over 50% of patients in both groups had resolution of impingement sign. Internal rotation increased from 8.6° (±11.8) to 20.0° (±10.4) in the NRT group (p=.043) and from 4.0° (±12.1) to 18.6° (±14.0) in the RT group (p<.001). Both groups had increased flexion post-operatively to normal range, but the change was only significant for the RT group (p=.02). Both groups had insignificant decreases in external rotation. Conclusion: Satisfactory clinical outcomes were seen in hips with mixed impingement, regardless of whether RT was performed, provided impingement-free functional motion was attained and no severe cartilage damage was seen

    Is the contralateral tibia a reliable template for reconstruction:a three‑dimensional anatomy cadaveric study

    Full text link
    Purpose: The contralateral anatomy is regularly used as a reconstruction template for corrective osteotomies of several deformities and pathological conditions. However, there is lack of evidence that the intra-individual differences between both tibiae are sufficiently small to use the contralateral tibia as a 3D reconstruction template for complex osteotomies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-individual side differences of the tibia in length, torsion, angulation, and translation using 3D measurement techniques. Methods: 3D surface models of both tibiae were created from computed tomography data of 51 cadavers. The (mirrored) models of the right tibiae were divided into two halves at the centre of the shaft. Thereafter, the proximal and distal segments were aligned to the left (contralateral) tibia in an automated fashion. The relative 3D transformation between both aligned segments was measured to quantify the side difference in 6° of freedom (3D translation vector, 3 angles of rotation). Results: The mean side difference in tibia length was 2.1 mm (SD 1.3 mm; range 0.2-5.9 mm). The mean side difference in torsion was 4.9° (SD 4.1°; range 0.2°-17.6°). The mean side difference in the coronal and sagittal planes was 1.1° (SD 0.9°; range 0.0°-4.6°) and 1.0° (SD 0.8°; range 0.1°-2.9°), respectively. Conclusion: The present study confirms small side differences in torsion between the left and right tibia, while the side differences in the coronal and sagittal plane are probably negligible. The contralateral tibia seems to be a reliable reconstruction template for the 3D preoperative planning of complex corrective osteotomies of the tibia. However, torsional differences should be interpreted with caution, as a single cut-off value of a clinically relevant torsional side difference cannot be defined. The presented results are relevant to surgeons considering the contralateral tibia as a 3D reconstruction template for corrective osteotomies of the tibia. Level of evidence: Basic science

    Correlation of systemic inflammatory markers with radiographic stages of charcot osteoarthropathy

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: Charcot osteoarthropathy (COA) is characterized by a progressive destruction of bone and joint associated with neuropathy and is most common in the foot and ankle. Clinical manifestation of COA is frequently indistinguishable from other causes of pain, swelling, and erythema of the affected extremity, in particular, infection. Diagnosis of COA can be challenging in particular in early stages where radiographic changes are sparse. The presence of elevated systemic inflammatory parameters in the context of suspected infection may delay early diagnosis and treatment of COA. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether elevated systemic inflammatory parameters may be present, in particular in early stages of COA and thus not be used as an exclusion criterion for the diagnosis of COA. METHODS: Forty-two patients (mean age 48.2 ± 9.4 years, 36 male, 6 female) with a diagnosis of unilateral COA were the subject of this retrospective study. The diagnosis of COA was confirmed by plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging and clinical course. Systemic inflammatory parameters were recorded at the time of referral. Acute stages (stages 0 and 1) were treated with a total contact cast (TCC) and protected weight bearing for a minimum of 6 weeks. For chronic stages (stages 2 and 3) custom-made shoes were prescribed. The feet were stratified into "acute" (Eichenholz stages 0 and 1) and "subacute/chronic" (Eichenholz stages 2 and 3) groups. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed for all recorded systemic inflammatory parameters (C-reactive protein level, WBC count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) between the acute and subacute/chronic groups. No statistical difference was observed considering the anatomic pattern of involvement. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that elevated systemic inflammatory parameters may be present in COA and can further be used to distinguish between acute and subacute stages of COA, based on the Eichenholtz classification. Thus, we suggest that elevated inflammatory markers should not be considered an exclusion criterion for the diagnosis of COA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series

    Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic patients: an 18-year follow-up

    Full text link
    Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with end-stage haemophilic arthropathy is considered to be a successful procedure with satisfying mid- to long-term results. It was the purpose of this study to provide clinical and radiological long-term results of TKAs implanted in a consecutive cohort of haemophilic patients. Method: Primary TKA was performed in 43 consecutive knees in 30 haemophilic patients. After a mean of 18 (SD ± 4) years, 15 patients (21 knees) with a mean age of 58 (SD ± 8) years were available for follow-up. The outcome was assessed using the Knee Society score, WOMAC, SF-36, Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis as well as radiographic evaluation of radiolucency. Results: In 13 (30%) of the 43 consecutive knees, revision surgery was necessary due to infection or aseptic loosening, among which eight (19%) due to aseptic loosening and five (12%) due to haematogenous infection. The calculated 20-year survival rates with revision for any reason or infection as the end points were 59 and 82%, respectively. All patients with the primary TKA in situ observed progressive radiolucent lines around the implants at the final follow-up. The Knee Society clinical and functional score significantly improved from pre- (36 points; SD ± 16 and 62 points; SD ± 19) to post-operatively (73 points; SD ± 15 and 78 points; SD ± 18; p < 0.001). Eighty-six per cent rated their result as either good or excellent. Whereas flexion did not improve, flexion contracture could be reduced significantly from 18° (SD ± 12) to 6° (SD ± 5; p < 0.001) post-operatively. Conclusion: Total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic patients is associated with high revision, loosening and infection rates after 18 years. However, if revision can be avoided, joint replacement in haemophilic patients helps to relieve pain, achieve higher subjective satisfaction and to restore knee function. Level of evidence IV

    Guided growth with tension band plate or definitive epiphysiodesis for treatment of limb length discrepancy?

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background It is not exactly known whether guided growth or definitive epiphysiodesis techniques are superior in treating limb length discrepancy (LLD). The purpose of the present study was therefore to find out if definitive epiphysiodesis is associated with more powerful LLD correction than tension band plate epiphysiodesis. Methods Pediatric patients with LLD treated either with tension band plating as a guided growth technique (temporary epiphysiodesis) or a percutaneous drilling technique (definitive epiphysiodesis) around the knee and a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic measurements were performed by two independent reviewers. The reduction in side difference between preoperative radiographs and last follow-up was calculated and compared between surgical techniques. Results Thirty-eight patients (mean age 13.6 years) were included, 17 treated with temporary and 21 with definitive epiphysiodesis. Average follow-up was at 578 days. The reduction of the LLD in 12 months was 5.7 mm in patients treated with temporary epiphysiodesis and 8.4 mm with definitive epiphysiodesis, respectively (p = 0.22). In both groups, LLD could be statistically significantly reduced after 12 and 24 months. Definitive epiphysiodesis had a lower revision rate (4.8% vs. 17.6%). Intra- and interobserver reliability of the measurements was excellent. Conclusions As in earlier studies supposed, temporary epiphysiodesis with tension band plating seems to correct LLD less powerful compared to definitive percutaneous epiphysiodesis. However, in the present study, the differences of LLD correction were not statistically significant. We do not recommend the use of tension band plates for LLD correction due to inferior correction with higher complication and revision rate

    Long-term results of total elbow arthroplasty in patients with hemophilia

    No full text
    HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that the long-term survivorship and clinical outcome are reasonable, justifying total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in patients with end-stage hemophilic arthropathy. METHODS: From 2002 to 2012, 13 primary TEAs (Coonrad-Morrey design) were implanted in 9 consecutive patients with an average age of 55 (range, 39-76) years. Type A hemophilia was diagnosed in 7 patients and type B hemophilia in 2 patients. Clinical and radiographic results of all (11 TEAs) but 1 patient were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: After a mean of 9.1 (range, 5-14) years, the mean visual analog scale score for pain, total Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and subjective elbow value were significantly improved from 5 (standard deviation, ±3) to 2 (±2; P = .007) points, from 64 (±16) to 89 (±11; P = .008) points, and from 47% (±15%) to 81% (±11%; P < .001), respectively. Whereas the flexion arc remained unchanged (P = .279), mean active pronation improved significantly (P = .024). Postoperative complications were recorded in 8 TEAs (62%), whereas 5 TEAs (38%) underwent partial component exchange after a mean of 7.2 (range, 3-10) years: 2 for periprosthetic infection, 2 for polyethylene wear, and 1 for humeral component loosening. Of the living patients after partial component exchange (n = 3), the mean final total Mayo Elbow Performance Score, flexion and rotation arc, visual analog scale score for pain, and subjective elbow value were comparable with the results of the living patients without revision surgery (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: TEA for patients with advanced hemophilic arthropathy is associated with a substantial complication and revision rate. However, even after revision without implant removal, it provides good functional and subjective long-term results
    corecore