Prioritization of knowledge-needs to achieve best practices for bottom trawling in relation to seabed habitats

Management and technical approaches that achieve a sustainable level of fish production while at the same time minimizing or limiting the wider ecological effects caused through fishing gear contact with the seabed might be considered to be ‘best practice’. To identify future knowledge-needs that would help to support a transition towards the adoption of best practices for trawling, a prioritization exercise was undertaken with a group of 39 practitioners from the seafood industry and management, and 13 research scientists who have an active research interest in bottom-trawl and dredge fisheries. A list of 108 knowledge-needs related to trawl and dredge fisheries was developed in conjunction with an ‘expert task force’. The long list was further refined through a three stage process of voting and scoring, including discussions of each knowledge-need. The top 25 knowledge-needs are presented, as scored separately by practitioners and scientists. There was considerable consistency in the priorities identified by these two groups. The top priority knowledge-need to improve current understanding on the distribution and extent of different habitat types also reinforced the concomitant need for the provision and access to data on the spatial and temporal distribution of all forms of towed bottom-fishing activities. Many of the other top 25 knowledge-needs concerned the evaluation of different management approaches or implementation of different fishing practices, particularly those that explore trade-offs between effects of bottom trawling on biodiversity and ecosystem services and the benefits of fish production as food.Fil: Kaiser, Michel J.. Bangor University; Reino UnidoFil: Hilborn, Ray. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Jennings, Simon. Fisheries and Aquaculture Science; Reino UnidoFil: Amaroso, Ricky. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Andersen, Michael. Danish Fishermen; DinamarcaFil: Balliet, Kris. Sustainable Fisheries Partnership; Estados UnidosFil: Barratt, Eric. Sanford Limited; Nueva ZelandaFil: Bergstad, Odd A. Institute of Marine Research; NoruegaFil: Bishop, Stephen. Independent Fisheries Ltd; Nueva ZelandaFil: Bostrom, Jodi L. Marine Stewardship Council; Reino UnidoFil: Boyd, Catherine. Clearwater Seafoods; CanadáFil: Bruce, Eduardo A. Friosur S.A.; ChileFil: Burden, Merrick. Marine Conservation Alliance; Estados UnidosFil: Carey, Chris. Independent Fisheries Ltd.; Estados UnidosFil: Clermont, Jason. New England Aquarium; Estados UnidosFil: Collie, Jeremy S. University of Rhode Island,; Estados UnidosFil: Delahunty, Antony. National Federation of Fishermen; Reino UnidoFil: Dixon, Jacqui. Pacific Andes International Holdings Limited; ChinaFil: Eayrs, Steve. Gulf of Maine Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Edwards, Nigel. Seachill Ltd.; Reino UnidoFil: Fujita, Rod. Environmental Defense Fund; Reino UnidoFil: Gauvin, John. Alaska Seafood Cooperative; Estados UnidosFil: Gleason, Mary. The Nature Conservancy; Estados UnidosFil: Harris, Brad. Alaska Pacific University; Estados UnidosFil: He, Pingguo. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth; Estados UnidosFil: Hiddink, Jan G. Bangor University; Reino UnidoFil: Hughes, Kathryn M. Bangor University; Reino UnidoFil: Inostroza, Mario. EMDEPES; ChileFil: Kenny, Andrew. Fisheries and Aquaculture Science; Reino UnidoFil: Kritzer, Jake. Environmental Defense Fund; Estados UnidosFil: Kuntzsch, Volker. Sanford Limited; Estados UnidosFil: Lasta, Mario. Diag. Montegrande N° 7078. Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Lopez, Ivan. Confederacion Española de Pesca; EspañaFil: Loveridge, Craig. South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation; Nueva ZelandaFil: Lynch, Don. Gorton; Estados UnidosFil: Masters, Jim. Marine Conservation Society; Reino UnidoFil: Mazor, Tessa. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research; AustraliaFil: McConnaughey, Robert A. US National Marine Fisheries Service; Estados UnidosFil: Moenne, Marcel. Pacificblu; ChileFil: Francis. Marine Scotland Science; Reino UnidoFil: Nimick, Aileen M. Alaska Pacific University; Estados UnidosFil: Olsen, Alex. A. Espersen; DinamarcaFil: Parker, David. Young; Reino UnidoFil: Parma, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Penney, Christine. Clearwater Seafoods; CanadáFil: Pierce, David. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries; Estados UnidosFil: Pitcher, Roland. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research; AustraliaFil: Pol, Michael. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries; Estados UnidosFil: Richardson, Ed. Pollock Conservation Cooperative; Estados UnidosFil: Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D. Wageningen IMARES; Países BajosFil: Rilatt, Simon. A. Espersen; DinamarcaFil: Rodmell, Dale P. National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations; Reino UnidoFil: Rose, Craig. FishNext Research; Estados UnidosFil: Sethi, Suresh A. Alaska Pacific University; Estados UnidosFil: Short, Katherine. F.L.O.W. Collaborative; Nueva ZelandaFil: Suuronen, Petri. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department; ItaliaFil: Taylor, Erin. New England Aquarium; Estados UnidosFil: Wallace, Scott. The David Suzuki Foundation; CanadáFil: Webb, Lisa. Gorton's Inc.; Estados UnidosFil: Wickham, Eric. Unit four –1957 McNicoll Avenue; CanadáFil: Wilding, Sam R. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados UnidosFil: Wilson, Ashley. Department for Environment; Reino UnidoFil: Winger, Paul. Memorial University Of Newfoundland; CanadáFil: Sutherland, William J. University of Cambridge; Reino Unid

Proactive pharmaceutical care interventions improve patients' adherence to lipid-lowering medication

Bachground: Lipid-lowering drugs are effective preventive medication for patients at risk of cardiovascular complications. However, medication adherence is suboptimal, thereby decreasing therapy effectiveness. Pharmaceutical care interventions may increase therapy adherence. Objective: To assess the effect of a proactive pharmaceutical care intervention program, Medication Monitoring and Optimization (MeMO), on therapy discontinuation and adherence with lipid-lowering drugs as well as patients' satisfaction with the intervention program. Methods: This prospective intervention study included 1002 patients initiating lipid-lowering drug therapy from 9 Dutch community pharmacies. In the intervention group (n = 500), the MeMO program was used, comprising continuous monitoring of patients' adherence to lipid-lowering drugs and personal counseling with nonadherent patients. The intervention group was compared with a historical reference group (n = 502) receiving usual care. Outcomes were therapy discontinuation and adherence. Results: Discontinuation rates with lipid lowering drugs in the first year after drug initiation were 13.6% for the intervention group and 25.9% in the usual care group; continued but non-adherent use was 3.2% and 7.6% in these groups. Patients in the MeMO program had a decreased risk to discontinue medication of 51% (95% confidence interval: 34%-63%). Results were not affected by potential confounders. Patient satisfaction with MeMO was very high; one quarter of patients mentioned that they only received information about their medication from their pharmacy. Conclusions: Improving adherence to lipid lowering drugs can be achieved by a proactive pharmaceutical care program. Pharmacists can contribute to optimal use of chronic medication, which is likely to reduce healthcare costs

Gerichte farmaceutische zorg voor patiënten met astma en COPD:een oriënterende studie

Pharmaceutisch weekblad 2014;8:A1413:49-5

Medication monitoring and optimization: a targeted pharmacist program for effective and cost-effective improvement of chronic therapy adherence

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies provide a promising platform for monitoring and improving therapy adherence and providing pharmaceutical care. Structured methods and appropriate software are important tools to increase pharmacist effectiveness and improve health outcomes. In 2006, the Medication Monitoring and Optimization (MeMO) program was introduced in several community pharmacies in the Netherlands. MeMO facilitates targeted and continuous patient-centered pharmaceutical care around chronic medication, such as for osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES: To describe the MeMO program and summarize findings from publications on its effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: In the first part of this article, the MeMO program is extensively described. In the second part, a review of the evidence of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction of the MeMO program is provided. Evidence is based on 5 previously published articles. RESULTS: The MeMO program starts with structured counseling sessions with patients at the initiation and follow-up of chronic therapies. This process is followed by a continuous phase in which patients' therapy adherence is monitored on a monthly basis, using standardized search algorithms in the pharmacy database. When the algorithm detects a patient's discontinuation of therapy, tailored interventions are used to improve adherence and optimize pharmacotherapy. For osteoporosis patients, treatment discontinuation with bisphosphonates after 1 year dropped from 31.7% to 16.1% (P CONCLUSION: The MeMO program is an effective and structured method to improve patients' adherence to chronic medication in the field of osteoporosis, lipid-lowering drugs, and asthma/COPD and is well received by patients. By targeting the program toward nonadherent and high-risk patients, the program showed favorable cost-effectiveness. Copyright (C) 2014, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved