5 research outputs found
Locoregionally Recurrent Colon Cancer: How Far Have We Come? A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study
No full textBackground: The reported outcomes of locoregionally recurrent colon cancer (LRCC) are poor, but the literature about LRCC is scarce and aged. Recent population-based studies to provide current insight into LRCC are warranted. This study aimed to provide an overview of the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and overall survival (OS) of patients with LRCC after curative resection of stage I–III primary colon cancer. Methods: Data on disease recurrence were collected for all patients with a diagnosis of non-metastasized primary colon cancer in the Netherlands during the first 6 months of 2015. Patients who underwent surgical resection (N = 3544) were included in this study. The 3-year cumulative incidence, risk factors, treatment, and OS for patients with LRCC were determined. Results: The 3-year cumulative incidence of LRCC was 3.8%. Synchronous distant metastases (LRCC-M1) were diagnosed in 62.7% of the patients. The risk factors for LRCC were age of 70 years or older, pT4, pN1-2, and R1-2. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of LRCC for high-risk stage II and stage III patients [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.93]. The median OS for the patients with LRCC was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.1–18.3 months). Curative-intent treatment was given to 22.4% of the LRCC patients, and the subsequent 3 years OS was 71% (95% CI 58–87%). The patients treated with palliative treatment and best supportive care showed 3-year OS rates of 15% (95% CI 7.0–31%) and 3.7% (95% CI 1.0–14%), respectively. Conclusions: The cumulative incidence of LRCC was low, and adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a decreased risk for LRCC among targeted patients. Curative-intent treatment was given to nearly 1 in 4 LRCC patients, and the OS for this group was high
Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Toward a Second Chance at Cure? A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study
Get PDFBackground: In current practice, rates of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) are low due to the use of the total mesorectal excision (TME) in combination with various neoadjuvant treatment strategies. However, the literature on LRRC mainly consists of single- and multicenter retrospective cohort studies, which are prone to selection bias. The aim of this study is to provide a nationwide, population-based overview of LRRC after TME in the Netherlands. Patients and Methods: In total, 1431 patients with nonmetastasized primary rectal cancer diagnosed in the first six months of 2015 and treated with TME were included from the nationwide, population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data on disease recurrence were collected for patients diagnosed in these 6 months only. Competing risk cumulative incidence, competing risk regression, and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to assess incidence, risk factors, treatment, and overall survival (OS) of LRRC. Results: Three-year cumulative incidence of LRRC was 6.4%; synchronous distant metastases (LRRC-M1) were present in 44.9% of patients with LRRC. Distal localization, R1–2 margin, (y)pT3-4, and (y)pN1-2 were associated with an increased LRRC rate. No differences in LRRC treatment and OS were found between patients who had been treated with or without prior n(C)RT. Curative-intent treatment was given to 42.9% of patients with LRRC, and 3-year OS thereafter was 70%. Conclusions: Nationwide LRRC incidence was low. A high proportion of patients with LRRC underwent curative-intent treatment, and OS of this group was high in comparison with previous studies. Additionally, n(C)RT for primary rectal cancer was not associated with differences in treatment and OS of LRRC
Incidence, treatment and relative survival of early-onset colorectal cancer in the Netherlands since 1989
Get PDFAim: Previous studies showed that the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC, diagnosis <50 years) is rising in Western countries. Additionally, young patients present with more advanced disease. Integrated nationwide assessment of epidemiologically and clinically relevant trends would provide more insight into this specific group of patients with CRC. We aimed to provide an analysis of trends in age- and stage-specific incidence, characteristics, treatment and relative survival of patients with EO-CRC in the Netherlands and compare these with 50- to 59-year-old patients. Methods: Data from 1989 to 2018 were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Non-standardised age-specific incidence rates were calculated, and trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression. Treatment and 5-year relative survival trends were provided and compared between EO-CRC and 50- to 59-year-old patients. Results: The EO-CRC incidence annually increased with 0.7–2.1% over the last decades. CRC incidence for the 50- to 59-year-old population annually increased with 0.8–1.7% until 2006 and showed a major increase in incidence after the introduction of nationwide screening in 2014. Stage III and Stage IV CRC primarily increased across the studied age groups, while Stage I and Stage II CRC did not. Patients with EO-CRC received multimodal treatment more often than 50- to 59-year-old patients, but differences were minor. Relative survival increased over time and showed little differences between EO-CRC and 50- to 59-year-old patients. Concluding statement: Only few epidemiological and clinical differences were found between EO-CRC and 50- to 59-year-old patients; hence, the urge for a specific approach of EO-CRC in screening and treatment guidelines might be tempered
Towards patient-led follow-up after curative surgical resection of stage I, II and III colorectal cancer (DISTANCE-trial): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial
Get PDFAbstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most frequently diagnosed cancers. Approximately 20–30% of stage I-III CRC patients develop a recurrent tumour or metastases after curative surgical resection. Post-operative follow-up is indicated for the first five years after curative surgical resection. As intensified follow-up after curative surgical resection has shown no effect on survival, patient organisations and policy makers have advocated for a more patient-centred approach to follow-up. The objective of this study is to successfully implement patient-led, home-based follow-up (PHFU) in six hospitals in The Netherlands, with as ultimate aim to come to a recommendation for a patient-centred follow-up schedule for stage I-III CRC patients treated with surgical resection with curative intent. Methods This study is designed as a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial (SW-CRT) in six participating centres. During the trial, three centres will implement PHFU after six months; the other three centres will implement PHFU after 12 months of inclusion in the control group. Eligible patients are those with pT2-4N0M0 or pT1-4N1-2M0 CRC, who are 18 years or older and have been free of disease for 12 months after curative surgical resection. The studied intervention is PHFU, starting 12 months after curative resection. The in-hospital, standard-of-care follow-up currently implemented in the participating centres functions as the comparator. The proportion of patients who had contact with the hospital regarding CRC follow-up between 12–24 months after curative surgical resection is the primary endpoint of this study. Quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence, patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness and survival are the secondary endpoints. Discussion The results of this study will provide evidence on whether nationwide implementation of PHFU for CRC in The Netherlands will be successful in reducing contact between patient and health care provider. Comparison of PROMs between in-hospital follow-up and PHFU will be provided. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of PHFU will be assessed. Trial registration Dutch Trail Register (NTR): NL9266 (Registered on January 1st, 2021)
