BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS IN TRAINING STUDENTS WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING LABORATORIES

There is a dearth of literature in disability and engineering research on the interaction between students with physical disabilities (SwD-P) and their experiences in the postsecondary science and engineering (S&E) laboratory setting. This dissertation extends the information available on this topic. An extensive literature review identifying barriers and facilitators students with physical disabilities encounter in S&E laboratories are described in detail. Psychometric properties of a newly developed nationwide survey were examined and descibed in detail. Empirical evidence on barriers and facilitators in instructional S&E laboratory settings are presented. Survey findings reveal that students experience a wide range of limitations to fully participating in the laboratory, from entering the laboratory to being given passive roles. The survey also reveal a range of supports such as elevators, ramps, accessible course materials, and peers have served as facilitators. The results of this dissertation build on existing literature and can help inform researchers and laboratory instructors on issues surrounding the use of science and engineering laboratories

Design and User Evaluation of a Wheelchair Mounted Robotic Assisted Transfer Device

Purpose. The aim of this study is to describe the robotic assisted transfer device (RATD) and an initial focus group evaluation by end users. The purpose of the device is to aid in the transfers of people with disabilities to and from their electric powered wheelchair (EPW) onto other surfaces. The device can be used for both stand-pivot transfers and fully dependent transfers, where the person being transferred is in a sling and weight is fully on the robot. The RATD is fixed to an EPW to allow for its use in community settings. Method. A functional prototype of the RATD was designed and fabricated. The prototype was presented to a group of 16 end users and feedback on the device was obtained via a survey and group discussion. Results. Thirteen out of sixteen (83%) participants agreed that it was important to develop this type of technology. They also indicated that user, caregiver, and robotic controls were important features to be included in the device. Conclusions. Participants in this study suggested that they would be accepting the use of robotic technology for transfers and a majority did not feel that they would be embarrassed to use this technology