Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in a Cohort of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis under Disease-Modifying Therapies

Background: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) alter the immune system and therefore increase the risk of infection. There is growing concern about the impact of COVID-19 on patients with MS (pwMS), especially those treated with DMTs. Methods: This is a single-center prospective observational study based on data from the Esclerosis Múltiple y COVID-19 (EMCOVID-19) study. Demographic characteristics, MS history, laboratory data and SARS-CoV-2 serology, and symptoms of COVID-19 in pwMS treated with any DTM were extracted. The relationship among demographics, MS status, DMT, and COVID-19 was evaluated. Results: A total of 259 pwMS were included. The administration of interferon was significantly associated with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (26.4% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.006). Although patients taking interferon were significantly older (49.1 vs. 43.5, p = 0.003), the association of interferon with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was still significant in the multivariate analysis (OR 2.99 (1.38; 6.36), p = 0.006). Conclusions: According to our data, pwMS present a higher risk of COVID-19 infection compared with results obtained from the general population. There is no evidence of a worse COVID-19 outcome in pwMS. DMTs did not significantly change the frequency of COVID-19, except for interferon; however, these findings must be interpreted with caution given the small sample of pwMS taking each DMT

Myelitis: Differences between multiple sclerosis and other aetiologies

Background: Myelitis can appear as an initial symptom in the context of demyelinating diseases, systemic inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases. We aim to analyse the differences between myelitis associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelitis resulting from other aetiologies. Methods: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients with initial myelitis (2000-2013). Demographic, aetiological, clinical, radiological and prognostic variables were analysed and compared between patients with myelitis from MS and those with myelitis due to other aetiologies. Results: We included 91 patients; mean follow-up was 7 years. Diagnoses were as follows: MS 57 (63%), idiopathic transverse myelitis 22 (24%), associated systemic diseases 6 (7%), and other diagnoses (6%). Myelitis due to MS was associated with younger age of onset (35 ± 11 vs 41 ± 13; P = .02), more pronounced sphincter involvement (40.4% vs 27.3%; P = .05), greater multifocal involvement in spinal MRI (77.2% vs 26.5%; P = .001), shorter lesion extension (2.4 vs. 1.4 vertebral segments; P = .001), cervical location (82.5% vs 64.7%; P = .05) and posterior location (89.5% vs 41.2%; P = .001). Myelitis due to other aetiologies more frequently showed anterior location (47.1% vs 24.6%; P = .02), and central cord involvement (47.1% vs 14.1%; P = .001), with better recovery at one year of follow up (EDSS 2.0 vs 1.5; P = .01). Multivariate analysis showed that multifocal spinal cord involvement (OR 9.38, 95% CI: 2.04-43.1) and posterior cord involvement (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 2.04-2.67) were independently associated with the diagnosis of MS. Conclusions: A high percentage of patients with an initial myelitis event will be diagnosed with MS. The presence of multifocal and posterior spinal cord lesions was significantly associated with the diagnosis of MS. Resumen: Introducción: Un primer brote de mielitis puede ocurrir en el contexto de enfermedades desmielinizantes, inflamatorias sistémicas o infecciosas. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar las diferencias entre mielitis asociadas a esclerosis múltiple (EM) y mielitis por otras etiologías. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo, unicéntrico, de pacientes con primer brote de mielitis (2000-2013). Se analizaron variables demográficas, etiológicas, clínicas, radiológicas y pronósticas, y se compararon entre mielitis por EM y mielitis por otras etiologías. Resultados: Se incluyó un total de 91 pacientes. Tiempo medio de seguimiento: 7 años. Diagnósticos: EM 57 (63%), mielitis transversa idiopática 22 (24%), asociada a enfermedades sistémicas 6 (7%), otros diagnósticos (6%). Mielitis por EM: menor edad de inicio (35 ± 11 vs .41 ± 13; p = 0,02), mayor afectación esfinteriana (40,4 vs 27,3%; p = 0,05), mayor afectación multifocal en la RM medular (77,2 vs 26,5%; p = 0,001), menor extensión de la lesión (segmentos vertebrales 2,4 vs 1,4; p = 0,001), localización cervical (82,5 vs 64,7%; p = 0,05) y localización posterior (89,5 vs 41,2%; p = 0,001). Mielitis por otras etiologías: mayor localización anterior (47,1 vs 24,6%; p = 0,02) y centromedular (47,1 vs 14,1%; p = 0,001) y mejor recuperación al año (EDSS 2,0 vs 1,5; p = 0,01). Análisis multivariante: la afectación multifocal medular (OR 9,38; IC 95%: 2,04-43,1) y del cordón posterior (OR 2,16; IC 95%: 2,04-2,67) se asociaron de forma independiente al diagnóstico de EM. Conclusiones: Un alto porcentaje de pacientes con un primer brote de mielitis serán diagnosticados de EM. La presencia de lesiones medulares multifocales y en el cordón posterior se asocian de forma significativa a este diagnóstico. Keywords: Myelitis, Multiple sclerosis, Idiopathic myelitis, Systemic diseases, Palabras clave: Mielitis, Esclerosis múltiple, Mielitis idiopáticas, Enfermedades sistémica

Mielitis. Diferencias entre esclerosis múltiple y otras etiologías

Resumen: Introducción: Un primer brote de mielitis puede ocurrir en el contexto de enfermedades desmielinizantes, inflamatorias sistémicas o infecciosas. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar las diferencias entre mielitis asociadas a esclerosis múltiple (EM) y mielitis por otras etiologías. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo, unicéntrico, de pacientes con primer brote de mielitis (2000-2013). Se analizaron variables demográficas, etiológicas, clínicas, radiológicas y pronósticas, y se compararon entre mielitis por EM y mielitis por otras etiologías. Resultados: Se incluyó un total de 91 pacientes. Tiempo medio de seguimiento: 7 años. Diagnósticos: EM 57 (63%), mielitis transversa idiopática 22 (24%), asociada a enfermedades sistémicas 6 (7%), otros diagnósticos (6%). Mielitis por EM: menor edad de inicio (35 ± 11 vs .41 ± 13; p = 0,02), mayor afectación esfinteriana (40,4 vs. 27,3%; p = 0,05), mayor afectación multifocal en la RM medular (77,2 vs. 26,5%; p = 0,001), menor extensión de la lesión (segmentos vertebrales 2,4 vs. 1,4; p = 0,001), localización cervical (82,5 vs. 64,7%; p = 0,05) y localización posterior (89,5 vs. 41,2%; p = 0,001). Mielitis por otras etiologías: mayor localización anterior (47,1 vs. 24,6%; p = 0,02) y centromedular (47,1 vs. 14,1%; p = 0,001) y mejor recuperación al año (EDSS 2,0 vs. 1,5; p = 0,01). Análisis multivariante: la afectación multifocal medular (OR 9,38; IC 95%: 2,04-43,1) y del cordón posterior (OR 2,16; IC 95%: 2,04-2,67) se asociaron de forma independiente al diagnóstico de EM. Conclusiones: Un alto porcentaje de pacientes con un primer brote de mielitis serán diagnosticados de EM. La presencia de lesiones medulares multifocales y en el cordón posterior se asocian de forma significativa a este diagnóstico. Abstract: Background: Myelitis can appear as an initial symptom in the context of demyelinating diseases, systemic inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases. We aim to analyse the differences between myelitis associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelitis resulting from other aetiologies. Methods: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients with initial myelitis (2000-2013). Demographic, aetiological, clinical, radiological and prognostic variables were analysed and compared between patients with myelitis from MS and those with myelitis due to other aetiologies. Results: We included 91 patients; mean follow-up was 7 years. Diagnoses were as follows: MS 57 (63%), idiopathic transverse myelitis 22 (24%), associated systemic diseases 6 (7%), and other diagnoses (6%). Myelitis due to MS was associated with younger age of onset (35 ± 11 vs. 41 ± 13; P  =  .02), more pronounced sphincter involvement (40.4 vs. 27.3%; P=.05), greater multifocal involvement in spinal MRI (77.2 vs. 26.5%; P=.001), shorter lesion extension (2.4 vs. 1.4 vertebral segments; P=.001), cervical location (82.5 vs. 64.7%; P=.05) and posterior location (89.5 vs. 41.2%; P=.001). Myelitis due to other aetiologies more frequently showed anterior location (47.1 vs. 24.6%; P=.02), and central cord involvement (47.1 vs. 14.1%; P=.001), with better recovery at one year of follow up (EDSS 2.0 vs. 1.5; P=.01). Multivariate analysis showed that multifocal spinal cord involvement (OR 9.38, 95% CI: 2.04-43.1) and posterior cord involvement (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 2.04-2.67) were independently associated with the diagnosis of MS. Conclusions: A high percentage of patients with an initial myelitis event will be diagnosed with MS. The presence of multifocal and posterior spinal cord lesions was significantly associated with the diagnosis of MS. Palabras clave: Mielitis, Esclerosis múltiple, Mielitis idiopáticas, Enfermedades sistémicas, Keywords: Myelitis, Multiple sclerosis, Idiopathic myelitis, Systemic disease

Gadolinium-enhanced brain lesions in multiple sclerosis relapse Lesiones cerebrales captantes de gadolinio en el brote de los pacientes con esclerosis múltiple

Objective: To study the clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse by analyzing the number and location of gadolinium-enhanced (Gd+) lesions on brain MRI before methylprednisolone (MP) treatment. Methods: We analyzed brain MRI from 90 relapsed MS patients in two Phase IV multicenter double-blind randomized clinical trials that showed the noninferiority of different routes and doses of MP administration. A 1.5- or 3-T brain MRI was performed at baseline before MP treatment and within 15 days of symptom onset. The number and location of Gd+ lesions were analyzed. Associations were studied using univariate analysis. Results: Sixty-two percent of patients had at least 1 Gd+ brain lesion; the median number was 1 (interquartile range 0-4), and 41% of patients had 2 or more lesions. The most frequent location of Gd+ lesions was subcortical (41.4%). Gd+ brain lesions were found in 71.4% of patients with brainstem-cerebellum symptoms, 57.1% with spinal cord symptoms and 55.5% with optic neuritis (ON). Thirty percent of patients with brain symptoms did not have Gd+ lesions, and only 43.6% of patients had symptomatic Gd+ lesions. The univariate analysis showed a negative correlation between age and the number of Gd+ lesions (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Most patients with relapse showed several Gd+ lesions on brain MRI, even when the clinical manifestation was outside of the brain. Our findings illustrate the clinico-radiological paradox in MS relapse and support the value of brain MRI in this scenario