The Reporter's Obligation

The John Peter Zenger Award for Freedom of the Press and the People's Right to Know, 1975 / The Reporter's Obligation, An Address by Seymour M. Hersh, The New York TimesIncludes list of previous Zenger Award winners and foreword by George W. Ridge Jr., University of Arizona.This title from the Zenger Awards collection is made available by the University of Arizona School of Journalism and the University of Arizona Libraries. For more information about the Zenger Awards, visit http://journalism.arizona.edu/zenger

Wielding Masculinity inside Abu Ghraib: Making Feminist Sense of an American Military Scandal

Responding to the torrent of Abu Ghraib stories coming out of Iraq during the spring and summer of 2004, President George W. Bush and his Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, tried to reassure the public that the graphically abusive behavior inside the prison was not representative of America, nor did it reflect the Bush administration\u27s own foreign policies. Rather, the Abu Ghraib abuses were the work of rogue soldiers, a few bad apples. The bad apple explanation always goes like this: the institution is working fine, its values are appropriate, its internal dynamics are of a sort that sustain positive values and respectful, productive behavior. Thus, according to the bad apple explanation, nothing needs to be reassessed or reformed in the way the organization works; all that needs to happen to stop the abuse is to prosecute and remove those few individuals who refused to play by the established rules. Sometimes this may be true. Some listeners to the Bush administration\u27s bad apple explanation, however, weren\u27t reassured. They wondered if the Abu Ghraib abuses were not produced by just a few bad apples found in a solid, reliable barrel, but, instead, were produced by an essentially bad barrel. They also wondered whether this barrel embraced not only the Abu Ghraib prison, but the larger US military, intelligence and civilian command structures ([Hersh], 2004b; Hersh, 2004c; Human Rights Watch, 2004)