Optimization of comparative genomic hybridization using fluorochrome conjugated to Dctp and Dutp nucleotides

Fil: Elrifai, Wa`el. Department of Medical Genetics. Haartman Institute. University of Helsinki. Helsinki; FinlandFil: Larramendy, Marcelo Luis. Cátedra de Citología. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Björkqvist, Anna-Maria. University of Helsinki; FinlandFil: Hemmer, Samuli. Department of Oncology. Helsinki University Central Hospital. Helsinki; FinlandFil: Knuutila, Sakari. Laboratory of Medical Genetics. Helsinki University. Central Hospital. Helsinki; Finlan

DNA Copy Number Losses at 1p32-pter in Monozygotic Twins Concordant for Breast Cancer

To find similarities that may possibly indicate novel mutations, we performed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis following degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for DNA obtained from unique material of breast cancer that developed in monozygotic twin-pairs. Polymerase chain reaction amplification was successful in 12 samples for 11 patients, including 3 pairs. Six samples exhibited DNA copy number changes. Gains (76%) were more frequent than losses (24%). Gains or high-level amplifications in 8q were present in all but 1 of the abnormal cases. Frequent gains were detected with a minimal common overlapping region at 5p (4 cases), at 1q25-qter (3 cases), and at 20q12-qter (2 cases). The most frequent loss, detected in half of the abnormal cases, was at 1p32-pter. One twin-pair showed similar changes in 4 chromosomal locations involving loss of 1p32-pter and gains in 1q25-qter, 5, and 8q

DNA Copy Number Losses in Human Neoplasms

This review summarizes reports of recurrent DNA sequence copy number losses in human neoplasms detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Recurrent losses that affect each of the chromosome arms in 73 tumor types are tabulated from 169 reports. The tables are available online at http://www.amjpathol.org and http://www.helsinki.fi/∼lgl_www/CMG.html. The genes relevant to the lost regions are discussed for each of the chromosomes. The review is supplemented also by a list of known and putative tumor suppressor genes and DNA repair genes (see Table 1, online). Losses are found in all chromosome arms, but they seem to be relatively rare at 1q, 2p, 3q, 5p, 6p, 7p, 7q, 8q, 12p, and 20q. Losses and their minimal common overlapping areas that were present in a great proportion of the 73 tumor entities reported in Table 2 (see online) are (in descending order of frequency): 9p23-p24 (48%), 13q21 (47%), 6q16 (44%), 6q26-q27 (44%), 8p23 (37%), 18q22-q23 (37%), 17p12-p13 (34%), 1p36.1 (34%), 11q23 (33%), 1p22 (32%), 4q32-qter (31%), 14q22-q23 (25%), 10q23 (25%), 10q25-qter (25%),15q21 (23%), 16q22 (23%), 5q21 (23%), 3p12-p14 (22%), 22q12 (22%), Xp21 (21%), Xq21 (21%), and 10p12 (20%). The frequency of losses at chromosomes 7 and 20 was less than 10% in all tumors. The chromosomal regions in which the most frequent losses are found implicate locations of essential tumor suppressor genes and DNA repair genes that may be involved in the pathogenesis of several tumor types