The self-regulatory German health care system between growing competition and state hierarchy

This article focuses on the changing role of the state in financing, providing and regulating health care services under the German health care system from 1970-2000. While a reduced role of the state can be observed in terms of financing, our analysis of service provision indicates inconsistent developments. Monetary resource flow analyses indicate a decrease in private service provision as a percentage of total health expenditure, but when analysing the development of health employment we see a growth in "private" health care personnel. The most important changes, however, have taken place in terms of regulation. Since the early 1990s, the traditionally self-regulatory German health care system has simultaneously faced growing competition and state hierarchy. -- Thema des Beitrags ist die sich ändernde Rolle des Staates in der Finanzierung, Leistungserbringung und Regulierung im deutschen Gesundheitssystem zwischen 1970 und 2000. Während sich bei der Finanzierung von Gesundheitsleistungen ein Rückzug des Staates abzeichnet, ergibt die Analyse der Leistungserbringung keinen einheitlichen Trend. Gemessen in Prozent der Gesamtausgaben für Gesundheit zeigt die Untersuchung der monetären Ressourcen eine Reduzierung der privaten Leistungserbringung, wohingegen bei der Analyse des Gesundheitspersonals ein Anstieg der privaten Leistungserbringung zu erkennen ist. Die wichtigsten Änderungen erfolgten allerdings im Bereich der Regulierung. Seit den frühen 1990er Jahren befindet sich das traditionell selbstverwaltete deutsche Gesundheitssystem zunehmend in einer Umklammerung aus staatlicher Regulierung einerseits und Wettbewerb andererseits.

The self-regulatory German health care system between growing competition and state hierarchy

This article focuses on the changing role of the state in financing, providing and regulating health care services under the German health care system from 1970-2000. While a reduced role of the state can be observed in terms of financing, our analysis of service provision indicates inconsistent developments. Monetary resource flow analyses indicate a decrease in private service provision as a percentage of total health expenditure, but when analysing the development of health employment we see a growth in "private" health care personnel. The most important changes, however, have taken place in terms of regulation. Since the early 1990s, the traditionally self-regulatory German health care system has simultaneously faced growing competition and state hierarchy.Thema des Beitrags ist die sich ändernde Rolle des Staates in der Finanzierung, Leistungserbringung und Regulierung im deutschen Gesundheitssystem zwischen 1970 und 2000. Während sich bei der Finanzierung von Gesundheitsleistungen ein Rückzug des Staates abzeichnet, ergibt die Analyse der Leistungserbringung keinen einheitlichen Trend. Gemessen in Prozent der Gesamtausgaben für Gesundheit zeigt die Untersuchung der monetären Ressourcen eine Reduzierung der privaten Leistungserbringung, wohingegen bei der Analyse des Gesundheitspersonals ein Anstieg der privaten Leistungserbringung zu erkennen ist. Die wichtigsten Änderungen erfolgten allerdings im Bereich der Regulierung. Seit den frühen 1990er Jahren befindet sich das traditionell selbstverwaltete deutsche Gesundheitssystem zunehmend in einer Umklammerung aus staatlicher Regulierung einerseits und Wettbewerb andererseits

Convergence of divergence of OECD health care systems

This article focuses on two major questions concerning the changing role of the state in the health care systems of OECD countries. Firstly, we ask whether major changes in the level of state involvement (in health care systems) have occurred in the past thirty years. Given the fact that three types of health care systems - which are characterized by a distinct role of the state - evolved during the golden age, we secondly discuss how this distinctiveness - or more technically: variance - has changed in the period under scrutiny. While many authors analysing health policy changes exclusively concentrate on finance and expenditure data, we simultaneously consider financing, service provi-sion, and regulation. As far as financing is concerned, we observe a small shift from the public to the pri-vate sphere with a tendency towards convergence in this dimension. Expanding Peter Flora´s `growth to limits´ theses, due to the ongoing increase of total financing and the melting off of the public share `private growth and public limits´ might be a future trend in the financing dimension of health care systems. The few data available on ser-vice provision, in contrast, show neither signs of retreat of the state nor of convergence. In the regulation dimension - which we analyse by picking major health system reforms in Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States - we see the introduction or strengthening of those coordination mechanisms (hierarchy, markets and self-regulation) which were traditionally weak in the respective type of health care system. `Gate-keeping´ and DRG models are remarkable examples to show that health policy might increasingly be oriented at `best practices´ even when the respective solutions are beyond the traditional path of reforms. Putting these findings together we find a ten-dency of convergence from distinct types towards mixed types of health care systems. - --

Convergence of divergence of OECD health care systems

This article focuses on two major questions concerning the changing role of the state in the health care systems of OECD countries. Firstly, we ask whether major changes in the level of state involvement (in health care systems) have occurred in the past thirty years. Given the fact that three types of health care systems - which are characterized by a distinct role of the state - evolved during the golden age, we secondly discuss how this distinctiveness - or more technically: variance - has changed in the period under scrutiny. While many authors analysing health policy changes exclusively concentrate on finance and expenditure data, we simultaneously consider financing, service provi-sion, and regulation. As far as financing is concerned, we observe a small shift from the public to the pri-vate sphere with a tendency towards convergence in this dimension. Expanding Peter Flora´s `growth to limits´ theses, due to the ongoing increase of total financing and the melting off of the public share `private growth and public limits´ might be a future trend in the financing dimension of health care systems. The few data available on ser-vice provision, in contrast, show neither signs of retreat of the state nor of convergence. In the regulation dimension - which we analyse by picking major health system reforms in Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States - we see the introduction or strengthening of those coordination mechanisms (hierarchy, markets and self-regulation) which were traditionally weak in the respective type of health care system. `Gate-keeping´ and DRG models are remarkable examples to show that health policy might increasingly be oriented at `best practices´ even when the respective solutions are beyond the traditional path of reforms. Putting these findings together we find a ten-dency of convergence from distinct types towards mixed types of health care systems.

for Decoupled Path Planning Techniques for Teams of Mobile Robots

Workshop Organisatio