Window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis - definitions and supporting evidence: from old to new perspectives

The therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is often referred to. However, some have questioned whether such a period, in which the disease is more susceptible to disease-modifying treatment, really exists. Observational studies are most frequently referenced as supporting evidence, but results of such studies are subject to confounding. In addition formal consensus on the definition of the term has never been reached. We first reviewed the literature to establish if there is agreement on the concept of the window of opportunity in terms of its time period and the outcomes influenced. Second, a systemic literature search was performed on the evidence of the benefit of early versus delayed treatment as provided by randomised clinical trials. We observed that the concept of the window of opportunity has changed with respect to timing and outcome since its first description 25 years ago. There is an ‘old definition’ pointing to the first 2 years after diagnosis with increased potential for disease-modifying treatment to prevent severe radiographic damage and disability. Strong evidence supports this concept. A ‘new definition’ presumes a therapeutic window in a pre-RA phase in which the biologic processes could be halted and RA development prevented by very early treatment. This definition is not supported by evidence, although is less well studied in trials. Some suggestions for future research in this area are made. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Immunoprofiling of early, untreated rheumatoid arthritis using mass cytometry reveals an activated basophil subset inversely linked to ACPA status

Background Autoantibody production is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are highly disease-specific, and their presence is associated with more severe disease and poor prognosis compared to ACPA-negative patients. However, the immune cell composition associated with antibody-positive/negative disease is incompletely defined. Mass cytometry (MC) is a high-dimensional technique offering new possibilities in the determination of the immune cell composition in rheumatic diseases. Here, we set up a broad phenotyping panel to study the immune cell profile of early untreated RA to investigate if specific immune cell subsets are associated with ACPA+ versus ACPA- RA. Methods Freshly obtained PBMCs of early, untreated RA patients (8 ACPA+ and 7 ACPA-) were analysed using a 36-marker MC panel, including markers related to various immune lineages. Data were processed using Cytosplore for dimensional reduction (HSNE) and clustering. Groups were compared using Cytofast. A second validation cohort of cryopreserved PBMCs obtained from early RA patients (27 ACPA+ and 20 ACPA-) was used to confirm MC data by flow cytometry (FC). FC data were processed and analysed using both an unsupervised analysis pipeline and through manual gating. Results MC indicated no differences when comparing major immune lineages (i.e. monocytes, T and B cells), but highlighted two innate subsets: CD62L(+) basophils (p = 0.33) and a subset of CD16(-) NK cells (p = 0.063). Although the NK cell subset did not replicate by FC, FC replication confirmed the difference in CD62L(+) basophil frequency when comparing ACPA+ to ACPA- patients (mean 0.32% vs. 0.13%; p = 0.01). Conclusions Although no differences in major lineages were found between early ACPA+ and ACPA- RA, this study identified the reduced presence of activated basophils in ACPA-negative disease as compared to ACPA-positive disease and thereby provides the first evidence for a connection between activated basophils and ACPA status.Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

How can misclassification be prevented when using the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria? Comment on the article by van der Linden et al Reply

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

Strategies to predict rheumatoid arthritis development in at-risk populations

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

IS CLINICAL ARTHRITIS ALWAYS PRECEDED BY SUBCLINICAL INFLAMMATION? A LONGITUDINAL STUDY AT JOINT LEVEL IN PATIENTS WITH ARTHRALGIA THAT DEVELOPED ARTHRITIS

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

THE COURSE OF FATIGUE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; A 10 YEAR LONGITUDINAL COHORT STUDY

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

THE COURSE OF SUBCLINICAL JOINT INFLAMMATION DURING PROGRESSION FROM ARTHRALGIA TO CLINICALLY DETECTABLE ARTHRITIS, A LONGITUDINAL MRI STUDY

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

Does psychological stress in patients with clinically suspect arthralgia associate with subclinical inflammation and progression to inflammatory arthritis?

Contains fulltext : 193533.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Within established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), stress can have pro-inflammatory effects by activating the immune system via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system. It is unknown if stress levels also promote inflammation during RA development. We studied whether the psychological stress response was increased in clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) and if this associated with inflammation at presentation with arthralgia and with progression to clinical arthritis. METHODS: In 241 CSA patients, psychological stress was measured by the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) at first presentation and during follow-up. Systemic inflammation was measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) and joint inflammation by 1.5 T-MRI of wrist, MCP, and MTP joints. RESULTS: At baseline, 12% (24/197) of CSA patients had a high psychological stress response according to the MHI-5. This was not different for patients presenting with or without an elevated CRP, with or without subclinical MRI-detected inflammation and for patients who did or did not develop arthritis. Similar findings were obtained with the PSS-10. When developing clinical arthritis, the percentage of patients with 'high psychological stress' increased to 31% (p = 0.025); during the first year of treatment this decreased to 8% (p = 0.020). 'High psychological stress' in non-progressors remained infrequent over time (range 7-13%). Stress was associated with fatigue (p = 0.003) and wellbeing (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological stress was not increased in the phase of arthralgia, raised at the time of diagnoses and decreased thereafter. The lack of an association with inflammation in arthralgia and this temporal relationship, argue against psychological stress having a significant contribution to progression from CSA to inflammatory arthritis

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A MODEL TO FACILITATE RECOGNITION OF ARTHRITIS BY GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease