BreastScreen Australia evaluation : a review of methodological options for evaluating the effect of BreastScreen Australia on breast cancer mortality

This report provides evidence-based recommendations for appropriate and cost-effective methods that could be used to evaluate the impact of the national BreastScreen Australia population-based mammographic screening program on mortality from female breast cancer. The report represents a significant collaboration between the Australian Government, the National Breast Cancer Centre as well as Australian and international experts in mammography research and evaluation, epidemiology and health services research.The recommendations are based on a review of national and international evidence on approaches used to assess the impact of mammography screening programs on breast cancer mortality in other settings. The review has used a systematic approach to assessing the strategic and methodological approaches taken in each of the studies identified and their potential limitations.The national evaluation of the BreastScreen Australia Program aims to assess the appropriateness, efficiency and effectiveness of the BreastScreen Program. The completion of this report marks an important first step in that process. In addition, the review and recommendations in this report may have broader application at an international level.<br /

Psychological distress and quality of life in lung cancer: The role of health-related stigma, illness appraisals and social constraints

Psycho-Oncology Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. Objective Health-related stigma is associated with negative psychological and quality of life outcomes in lung cancer patients. This study describes the impact of stigma on lung cancer patients' psychological distress and quality of life and explores the role of social constraints and illness appraisal as mediators of effect. Methods A self-administered cross-sectional survey examined psychological distress and quality of life in 151 people (59% response rate) diagnosed with lung cancer from Queensland and New South Wales. Health-related stigma, social constraints and illness appraisals were assessed as predictors of adjustment outcomes. Results Forty-nine percent of patients reported elevated anxiety; 41% were depressed; and 51% had high global distress. Health-related stigma was significantly related to global psychological distress and quality of life with greater stigma and shame related to poorer outcomes. These effects were mediated by illness appraisals and social constraints. Conclusions Health-related stigma appears to contribute to poorer adjustment by constraining interpersonal discussions about cancer and heightening feelings of threat. There is a need for the development and evaluation of interventions to ameliorate the negative effects of health-related stigma among lung cancer patients

The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Breast Health Surveys, conducted by the National Breast Cancer Centre (NBCC) in 1996 and 2003, are designed to gain insight into the knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of a nationally representative sample of Australian women on issues relevant to breast cancer. In this article, we focus on major aspects of the design and present results on respondents' knowledge about mammographic screening.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The 2003 BHS surveyed English-speaking Australian women aged 30–69 without a history of breast cancer using computer-assisted telephone interviewing. Questions covered the following themes: knowledge and perceptions about incidence, mortality and risk; knowledge and behaviour regarding early detection, symptoms and diagnosis; mammographic screening; treatment; and accessibility and availability of information and services. Respondents were selected using a complex sample design involving stratification. Sample weights against Australian population benchmarks were used in all statistical analyses. Means and proportions for the entire population and by age group and area of residence were calculated. Statistical tests were conducted using a level of significance of 0.01.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the 3,144 respondents who consented to being interviewed, 138 (4.4%) had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer and were excluded leaving 3,006 completed interviews eligible for analysis. A majority of respondents (61.1%) reported ever having had a mammogram and 29.1% identified mammography as being the best way of finding breast cancer. A majority of women (85.9%) had heard of the BreastScreen Australia (BSA) program, the national mammographic screening program providing free biennial screening mammograms, with 94.5% believing that BSA attendance was available regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms. There have been substantial gains in women's knowledge about mammographic screening over the seven years between the two surveys.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The NBCC Breast Health Surveys provide a valuable picture of the knowledge of Australian women about a range of issues. The present analysis shows significant gains in knowledge and behaviours relating to mammographic screening, while identifying additional areas for targeted improvement, as in the need to better communicate with women about screening and diagnostic services. Further analysis of additional core topic areas (eg., incidence, mortality, risk and treatment) will provide equally noteworthy insight.</p

Investigating breast symptoms in primary care : enhancing concordance with current best advice

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a targeted intervention could improve primary care practitioners' concordance with guidelines regarding management of women with breast symptoms. One hundred and twelve practitioners from randomly selected areas around Australia prospectively audited their investigations for each woman with a new breast symptom over two 12-week periods, before and five months after the release of national guidelines. Between the two audits, doctors received feedback on practice in relation to peers and attended one seminar in their local areas led by specialists from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. For five recommendations, there were statistically significant improvements at the second audit in line with standard Investigation of a New Breast Symptom (INBS) guidelines. All these were for investigations of breast lumps. At first audit, there were seven recommendations where practitioners were already managing more than 80% of women in accordance with the INBS, and where there were no statistically significant increases in concordance at second audit. Another six recommendations had lower concordance with the recommendations prior to the release of the guidelines and did not significantly improve at second audit. These tended to be for less-common presentations and where clinical findings were not consistent with other test results. We concluded that a targeted intervention improved physician concordance with current best advice for investigating women who present with new breast symptoms in a primary care setting. Further educational programs are needed to improve investigations for rarer symptoms, and to enhance physicians' confidence in the results of their clinical examinations

Survival from breast cancers managed by surgeons participating in the National Breast Cancer Audit of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

Background: The National Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA) of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons has collected data on early breast cancer since 1998. In this project, deaths were traced by linkage of NBCA patient identifiers (first three digits of surname and date of birth) with the National Death Index that covers all deaths in Australia. Methods: Death data were traced to 31 December 2007. Invasive cancers diagnosed in 1998–2005 were included in survival analyses to allow enough follow-up for assessment. Survivals were compared with survivals for similar stages recorded by the New South Wales (NSW) Cancer Registry and USA Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) programme. Survivals were analysed by conventional clinical risk factors to see if expected differences presented. Results: The 5-year survival from breast cancer of 93% for NBCAcases was the same as the SEER figure for local and regional cases combined in 1996–2004. The NBCA figure for localized cases was 97%, which was the same as for NSW. Node-positive NBCA cancers had a 5-year survival of 89%, which was slightly higher than the corresponding 86% for NSW, which may reflect exclusion from the NBCA of some cases with a poorer prognosis, including those with positive fixed nodes. As expected, lower survivals presented for older cases and those with conventional clinical risk factors. Conclusions: These survivals are credible both overall and by clinical risk factor. Opportunities present to use these data for survival monitoring and to investigate survival by socio-demographic characteristic, treatment protocol, case volume and provider characteristics.