11 research outputs found

    Enhanced Extinction of Aversive Memories by High-Frequency Stimulation of the Rat Infralimbic Cortex

    Get PDF
    Electrical stimulation of the rodent medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), including the infralimbic cortex (IL), immediately prior to or during fear extinction training facilitates extinction memory. Here we examined the effects of high-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the rat IL either prior to conditioning or following retrieval of the conditioned memory, on extinction of Pavlovian fear and conditioned taste aversion (CTA). IL-HFS applied immediately after fear memory retrieval, but not three hours after retrieval or prior to conditioning, subsequently reduced freezing during fear extinction. Similarly, IL-HFS given immediately, but not three hours after, retrieval of a CTA memory reduced aversion during extinction. These data indicate that HFS of the IL may be an effective method for reducing both learned fear and learned aversion

    Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity as a Mechanism for Sensory Timing

    No full text

    Differential Excitability of PV and SST Neurons Results in Distinct Functional Roles in Inhibition Stabilization of Up States.

    No full text
    Up states are the best studied example of an emergent neural dynamic regime. Computational models based on a single class of inhibitory neurons indicate that Up states reflect bistable dynamic systems in which positive feedback is stabilized by strong inhibition and predict a paradoxical effect in which increased drive to inhibitory neurons results in decreased inhibitory activity. To date, however, computational models have not incorporated empirically defined properties of parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SST) neurons. Here we first experimentally characterized the frequency-current (F-I) curves of pyramidal (Pyr), PV, and SST neurons from mice of either sex, and confirmed a sharp difference between the threshold and slopes of PV and SST neurons. The empirically defined F-I curves were incorporated into a three-population computational model that simulated the empirically derived firing rates of pyramidal, PV, and SST neurons. Simulations revealed that the intrinsic properties were sufficient to predict that PV neurons are primarily responsible for generating the nontrivial fixed points representing Up states. Simulations and analytical methods demonstrated that while the paradoxical effect is not obligatory in a model with two classes of inhibitory neurons, it is present in most regimes. Finally, experimental tests validated predictions of the model that the Pyr ↔ PV inhibitory loop is stronger than the Pyr ↔ SST loop.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Many cortical computations, such as working memory, rely on the local recurrent excitatory connections that define cortical circuit motifs. Up states are among the best studied examples of neural dynamic regimes that rely on recurrent excitatory excitation. However, this positive feedback must be held in check by inhibition. To address the relative contribution of PV and SST neurons, we characterized the intrinsic input-output differences between these classes of inhibitory neurons and, using experimental and theoretical methods, show that the higher threshold and gain of PV leads to a dominant role in network stabilization

    IL-HFS applied immediately before conditioning does not alter fear during extinction.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic diagram showing electrode placement in IL <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035853#pone.0035853-Paxinos1" target="_blank">[56]</a> for the fear conditioning experiments. (<b>B</b>) Timeline of behavioral testing and stimulation. (<b>C</b>) Percent freezing to CS during conditioning, fear retrieval, and extinction in rats receiving either sham or HFS prior to conditioning. Sham and HFS rats did not differ during any phase. Data are Means ±SEM.</p

    IL-HFS applied immediately after fear retrieval/short extinction training reduces fear during extinction.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic diagram showing electrode placement in IL for the fear conditioning experiments. Diagram adapted from Paxinos and Watson 1998. (<b>B</b>) Timeline of behavioral testing and stimulation. (<b>C</b>) Percent freezing (mean ± SEM) to CS during conditioning, fear retrieval, and extinction in rats receiving either sham or HFS after fear retrieval. HFS rats showed reduced fear during extinction relative to Shams (**<i>P</i><.01). (<b>D</b>) Percent freezing to CS during reconditioning and extinction in rats receiving either sham or HFS after fear retrieval. Reconditioning and re-extinction were not affected by prior IL stimulation. Data are Means ±SEM.</p

    IL-HFS applied immediately after CTA retrieval/short extinction does not affect the aversion index during extinction.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic diagram showing electrode placement in IL for the CTA experiment. (<b>B</b>) Timeline of behavioral testing and stimulation. (<b>C</b>) Aversion index (mL water drunk/total fluid drunk×100) during conditioning, retrieval, and extinction in rats receiving either sham or HFS 3 hrs after retrieval. HFS rats were not different from Shams. Data are Means ±SEM.</p
    corecore