14 research outputs found

    Supplementary Text

    No full text
    Contains all mathematical derivations, detailed methodological descriptions, etc., mentioned in the main text of the article

    Supplementary Tables

    No full text
    Contains all supplementary tables (S1-S14)

    Supplementary Figures

    No full text
    Contains all supplementary figures (S1-S7)

    README_computer_code

    No full text
    This file describes how to use the deposited code and simulation data to reproduce the manuscript figures

    Phenotypic delay in <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Phenotypic penetrance (mean ± SE; <i>n</i> = 6) over time for three antibiotic resistance mutations. Gray dashed lines: time at 50% phenotypic penetrance. (B) Frequency of homozygous mutants among all mutants (orange) for the three resistance mutations assessed by <i>lacZ</i> reporter constructs (<i>rpoB-lacZ</i>, <i>gyrA-lacZ</i>, <i>rpsL-lacZ</i>), overlaid with their respective phenotypic penetrance. (C) Genotypic mutant frequency for the resistance mutations. (D) Phenotypic penetrance of the lactose prototrophy (<i>rpsL-lacZ</i>) mutation. (E) Colonies founded by homozygous (blue) and heterozygous (sectored) lac<sup>+</sup> mutants. The numerical data for panels A to D can be found in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004644#pbio.2004644.s005" target="_blank">S1 Data</a>. MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.</p

    Approximate mutant frequencies at mutation–selection balance.

    No full text
    <p>Ploidy is <i>c</i> = 2<sup><i>n</i></sup> (<i>n</i> ≥ 1) in the polyploid cases, is the per-copy mutation rate, and <i>s</i> is the cost of the mutation in homozygotes (in heterozygotes, the cost is masked in the recessive case but expressed in the dominant case).</p
    corecore