Revisiting the difference between instrumental and terminal values to predict (stimulating) prosocial behaviours: the transcendental‐change profile

Past research suggests that the connection between values and people's behaviour may not be as straightforward and robust as has been claimed. We propose that a more holistic and discriminative view that acknowledges the influence of a specific combination of values on specific kinds of behaviour is needed. In the current project, we test two hypotheses regarding the transcendental-change profile (TCP). First, that TCP is characterized by a combination of the readiness to engage in those challenges (instrumental) that can make the world a better place (terminal). Second, the centrality of the TCP facilitates performance of those prosocial actions that are perceived as stimulating and global. The results of five studies support the reliability and validity of this conceptualization of TCP (Studies 1 and 2), and show that when the prosocial initiative is perceived as either global (Study 3) or stimulating (Studies 4 and 5), the TCP is the strongest predictor of the willingness and commitment to engage in such prosocial action.info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersio

Guidance by physicians and pharmacists during antidepressant therapy: patients' needs and suggestions for improvement

OBJECTIVE Guidance of patients treated with antidepressants is paramount for successful therapy. The aim was to assess patients' needs and suggestions for improvement of guidance by physicians and pharmacists during second generation antidepressant (SGA) therapy. DESIGN Five focus group discussions were held with a total of 34 patients using an SGA. METHODS The discussions were conducted flexibly and responsrvely using a semistructured topic list. All focus group discussions were video-recorded and transcripts were analysed using ATLAS.ti for coding, thematic and open analysis. RESULTS Participants stated they were in need of better guidance. They suggested improving content of information during decisional moments, patient-health care professional communication and communication in-between health care professionals, and finally, organisation of guidance. Barriers to achieving improved guidance were cited. CONCLUSION Content, communication and organisation of guidance are pivotal for achieving optimal guidance. Participants mentioned that their current experienced guidance had limitations and brought up solutions for improvement. A next step would be to discuss the suggested solutions with health care professionals to assess their views and to discuss the possibility for implementation. After implementation, future studies could be aimed at determination of its impact on patients' treatment efficacy, quality of life, treatment satisfaction and healthcare costs

Medication self-management: Considerations and decisions by older people living at home

BACKGROUND: Medication self-management is complicated for older people. Little is known about older persons' considerations and decisions concerning medication therapy at home. OBJECTIVE: (s): To explore how older people living at home self-manage their medication and what considerations and decisions underpin their medication self-management behavior. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with consenting participants (living at home, aged ≥65, ≥5 different prescription medications daily) were recorded and transcribed with supporting photographs. Content was analyzed with a directed approach and presented according to three phases of medication self-management (initiation, execution, and discontinuation). RESULTS: Sixty people were interviewed. In the initiation phase, participants used different techniques to inform healthcare professionals and to fill and check prescriptions. Over-the-counter medication was seldom discussed, and potential interactions were unknown to the participants. Some participants decided to not start treatment after reading the patient information leaflets for fear of side effects. In the execution phase, participants had various methods for integrating the use of new and chronic medication in daily life. Usage problems were discussed with healthcare professionals, but side effects were not discussed, since the participants were not aware that the signs and symptoms of side effects could be medication-related. Furthermore, participants stored medication in various (sometimes incorrect) ways and devised their own systems for ordering and filling repeat prescriptions. In the discontinuation phase, some participants decided to stop or change doses by themselves (because of side effects, therapeutic effects, or a lack of effect). They also mentioned different considerations regarding medication disposal and disposed their medication (in)correctly, stored it for future use, or distributed it to others. CONCLUSIONS: Participants' considerations and decisions led to the following: problems in organizing medication intake, inadequate discussion of medication-related information with healthcare professionals, and incorrect and undesirable medication storage and disposal. There is a need for medication self-management observation, monitoring, and assistance by healthcare professionals

Furthering patient adherence: A position paper of the international expert forum on patient adherence based on an internet forum discussion

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As the problem of patient non-adherence persists and a solution appears hard to be found, it continues to be important to look for new ways to further the issue. We recently conducted a meta-review of adherence intervention studies which yielded a preliminary agenda for future research, practice and theory development in patient adherence. The objective of the present project was to find out to what extent adherence experts consider this agenda relevant and feasible.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The thirty-five corresponding authors of the review studies included in the meta-review were invited to join the International Expert Forum on Patient Adherence and to participate in a four-week web-based focus group discussion. The discussion was triggered by the points on the preliminary agenda presented as propositions to which forum members could react. Two researchers analysed the transcripts and selected relevant phrases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty adherence experts participated. Various ideas and viewpoints were raised. After the closure of the web-site, the expert forum was asked to authorize the synthesis of the discussion, to list the propositions in order of priority and to answer a few questions on the use of the web-based focus group as a tool to obtain expert opinions. Their ranking showed that the development of simple interventions is the most promising step to take in fostering patient adherence, preferably within a multidisciplinary setting of medical, pharmaceutical, social and technical science and, not in the least, by incorporating patients' perspectives.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>For enhancing adherence, the development of simple interventions originating from a multidisciplinary perspective including patients' input, appears most promising. Disclosing patients' perspectives requires open communication about patients' expectations, needs and experiences in taking medication and about what might help them to become and remain adherent.</p

Key factors underlying the willingness of patients with cancer to participate in medication redispensing

BACKGROUND: Redispensing medication unused by patients to other patients could reduce the environmental burden of medication waste. Simultaneously, associated financial loss could be reduced, particularly for expensive medication such as oral anticancer drugs. An important determinant for successful medication redispensing is patient participation. OBJECTIVE(S): To identify key factors underlying the willingness of patients with cancer to participate in the redispensing of unused oral anticancer drugs. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews via telephone or video call were conducted with adult patients diagnosed with cancer from two Dutch hospitals. The interview guide was framed using the COM-B model for behavioural change, to elicit patients' capability, opportunity and motivation to participate in medication redispensing. Questions were related to patients' willingness to accept redispensed medication, reasons thereof, perceived concerns and needs. Inductive thematic analysis was applied. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (aged 38-82 years, 71% female), with nine different types of cancer participated. The majority of participants supported medication redispensing. Four categories of key factors underlying the willingness of patients with cancer to participate in medication redispensing were identified. First, the driver for participation was having positive societal impact, relating to affordability and sustainability of healthcare. Second, having trust in product quality was a requirement, influenced by preconceived beliefs, quality assurance and patients' knowledge of this process. Third, a facilitator for participating in medication redispensing was adequate provision of information. This concerned awareness of medication waste, information about medication redispensing, support from healthcare providers and other patients, and insight into medication dispensing history. Last, a convenient process for returning unused medication to pharmacies would facilitate participation in medication redispensing. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness of patients with cancer to participate in medication redispensing relates to a drive for achieving positive societal impact, provided that medication is of high quality, there is adequate information provision and a convenient process

Barriers and facilitators to implement the redispensing of unused oral anticancer drugs in clinical care: A hybrid-effectiveness type I study

Background: Minimizing medication waste through the redispensing of oral anticancer drugs (OADs) that were unused by patients provides economic and environmental benefits, but this is not yet universally implemented in clinical care. Objective(S): To identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of redispensing unused OADs in clinical care. Methods: A multicentre intervention study following a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design was conducted, consisting of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders involved in the redispensing program: pharmacy employees, prescribing clinicians in oncology and haematology, patients who participated in redispensing and patients who declined trial participation. Questions encompassed experiences and suggestions for future implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data collection and categorisation of identified barriers and facilitators through thematic analysis. Results: In total, 35 interviews were conducted, identifying 15 themes encompassing barriers and facilitators, reflecting all CFIR domains. Facilitators encompassed: 1) convenient process requiring an acceptable time-investment; 2) support from project leaders and implementation champions; 3) being well-motivated by personal values and societal impact; 4) feeling ensured of medication quality upon redispensing; 5) endorsement by healthcare providers for patient participation; 6) clear and personal patient communication; 7) good visibility of intervention successes; and 8) implementation well supported through a collaborative network. Barriers encompassed: 1) unclear target population; 2) redispensing legally prohibited; 3) absence of financial compensation for pharmacies; 4) complexity arising from two parallel work processes; 5) widespread communication on adjustments within local teams challenging; 6) patient's low receptiveness due to burden of oncology treatment; and 7) lack of familiarization among pharmacy technicians. Conclusions: Facilitators for implementation of redispensing unused drugs mainly related to people's values, motivation, and societal demand, whereas barriers mainly encompassed practical issues, including knowledge, time, financial resources, and legal conditions. Strategies emphasizing the benefits of redispensing and further streamlining process compatibility could support implementation

Discrepancies between prescribed and defined daily doses: a matter of patients or drug classes?

International audienc

Quantifying antibiotic use in paediatrics: a proposal for neonatal DDDs

The defined daily dose (DDD) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) has been the most frequently used unit of measurement to measure antibiotic use. However, measuring antibiotic use in paediatrics is a problem as the WHO DDD methodology is not applicable in children (aged >1 month) due to the large variation in body weight within this population. Based on the narrow range of body weights in the neonatal population, we therefore aimed to develop a set of neonatal DDDs for antibiotics. Eight well-respected (inter)national sources for dosage recommendations of antibiotics in children and neonates were consulted for the assumed maintenance dose of the ten most frequently used antibiotics in neonatal intensive care units in its main indication for neonates. A set of neonatal DDDs for ten commonly used antibiotics in neonates based on an assumed neonatal weight of 2 kg was proposed. Primarily in children DDDs are not applicable to quantify antibiotic use since there is large variation in body weight. In the neonatal population, however, based on its narrow range of body weights and when access to patient level data is not available, neonatal DDDs can be used as a unit of measurement

Patient risk profiles and practice variation in nonadherence to antidepressants, antihypertensives and oral hypoglycemics

BACKGROUND: Many patients experience difficulties in following treatment recommendations. This study's objective is to identify nonadherence risk profiles regarding medication (antidepressants, antihypertensives, and oral hypoglycemics) from a combination of patients' socio-demographic characteristics, morbidity presented within general practice and medication characteristics. An additional objective is to explore differences in nonadherence among patients from different general practices. METHODS: Data were obtained by linkage of a Dutch general practice registration database to a dispensing registration database from the year 2001. Subjects included in the analyses were users of antidepressants (n = 4,877), antihypertensives (n = 14,219), or oral hypoglycemics (n = 2,428) and their GPs. Outcome variables were: 1) early dropout i.e., a maximum of two prescriptions and 2) refill nonadherence (in patients with 3+ prescriptions); refill adherence < 80% was considered as nonadherence. Multilevel modeling was used for analyses. RESULTS: Both early dropout and refill nonadherence were highest for antidepressants, followed by antihypertensives. Risk factors appeared medication specific and included: 1) non-western immigrants being more vulnerable for nonadherence to antihypertensives and antidepressants; 2) type of medication influencing nonadherence in both antihypertensives and antidepressants, 3) GP consultations contributing positively to adherence to antihypertensives and 4) somatic co-morbidity influencing adherence to antidepressants negatively. There was a considerable range between general practices in the proportion of patients who were nonadherent. CONCLUSION: No clear risk profiles for nonadherence could be constructed. Characteristics that are correlated with nonadherence vary across different types of medication. Moreover, both patient and prescriber influence adherence. Especially non-western immigrants need more attention with regard to nonadherence, for example by better monitoring or communication. Since it is not clear which prescriber characteristics influence adherence levels of their patients, there is need for further research into the role of the prescriber