Postconditioning: a form of "modified reperfusion" protects the myocardium by activating the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-akt pathway

Brief intermittent episodes of ischemia and reperfusion, at the onset of reperfusion after a prolonged period of ischemia, confer cardioprotection, a phenomenon termed "ischemic postconditioning" (Postcond). We hypothesized that this phenomenon may just represent a modified form of reperfusion that activates the reperfusion injury salvage kinase (RISK) pathway. Isolated perfused rat hearts were subjected to: (a) 35 minutes of ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion, and infarct size was determined by tetrazolium staining; or (b) 35 minutes of ischemia and 7 minutes of reperfusion, and the phosphorylation states of Akt, endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), and p70S6K were determined. Postcond reduced infarct size from 51.2±3.4% to 31.5±4.1% (P<0.01), an effect comparable with ischemic preconditioning (IPC; 27.5±2.3%; P<0.01). Of interest, the combined protective effects of IPC and Postcond were not additive (30.1±4.8% with IPC+Postcond; P=NS). Inhibiting phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) at reperfusion using LY or Wortmannin (Wort) during the first 15 minutes of reperfusion completely abolished Postcond-induced protection (31.5±4.1% with Postcond versus 51.7±4.5% with Postcond+LY, P<0.01; 56.2±10.1% with Postcond+ Wort; P<0.01), suggesting that Postcond protects the heart by activating PI3K-Akt. Western blot analysis demonstrated that Postcond induced a significant increase in phosphorylation of Akt, eNOS, and p70S6K in an LY- and Wort-sensitive manner. In conclusion, we show for the first time that ischemic Postcond protects the myocardium by activating the prosurvival kinases PI3K-Akt, eNOS, and p70S6K in accordance with the RISK pathway

IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria : guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action

Full list of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action CA16225 Working group members is provided at the end of the article in Acknowledgements section. Funding Information: This article is based on the work from COST Action EU-CARDIOPROTECTION CA16225 supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). DJH is supported by the Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under its Clinician Scientist-Senior Investigator scheme (NMRC/CSA-SI/0011/2017) and Collaborative Centre Grant scheme (NMRC/CGAug16C006). SL is supported by grants from the South African Department of Science and Technology and the South African National Research Foundation. SMD is supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation (PG/19/51/34493 and PG/16/85/32471). GH is supported by the German Research Foundation (SFB 1116 B8). MRM is supported by the Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III (FIS PI19/01196 and CIBER-CV). RS is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [Project number 268555672—SFB 1213, Project B05]. PF is supported by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (Research Excellence Program—TKP, National Heart Program NVKP 16-1-2016-0017) and by the Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities in Hungary, within the framework of the Therapeutic Development thematic program of the Semmelweis University. Funding Information: The IMPACT criteria were presented for approval to the Management Committee of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action CA16225: Pavle Adamovski, Ioanna Andreadou, Saime Batirel, Monika Bartekov?, Luc Bertrand, Christophe Beauloye, David Biedermann, Vilmante Borutaite, Hans Erik Botker, Stefan Chlopicki, Maija Dambrova, Sean Davidson, Yvan Devaux, Fabio Di Lisa, Dragan Djuric, David Erlinge, Ines Falcao-Pires, P?ter Ferdinandy, Eleftheria Galatou, Alfonso Garcia-Sosa, Henrique Girao, Zoltan Giricz, Mariann Gyongyosi, Derek J Hausenloy, Donagh Healy, Gerd Heusch, Vladimir Jakovljevic, Jelena Jovanic, George Kararigas, Risto Kerkal, Frantisek Kolar, Brenda Kwak, Przemys?aw Leszek, Edgars Liepinsh , Jacob Lonborg, Sarah Longnus, Jasna Marinovic, Danina Mirela Muntean, Lana Nezic, Michel Ovize, Pasquale Pagliaro, Clarissa Pedrosa Da Costa Gomes, John Pernow, Andreas Persidis, S?ren Erik Pischke, Bruno Podesser, Ines Poto?njak, Fabrice Prunier, Tanya Ravingerova, Marisol Ruiz-Meana, Alina Serban, Katrine Slagsvold, Rainer Schulz, Niels van Royen, Belma Turan, Marko Vendelin, Stewart Walsh, Nace Zidar, Coert Zuurbier, Derek Yellon. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the heart failure (HF) which may follow are among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. As such, new therapeutic interventions are still needed to protect the heart against acute ischemia/reperfusion injury to reduce myocardial infarct size and prevent the onset of HF in patients presenting with AMI. However, the clinical translation of cardioprotective interventions that have proven to be beneficial in preclinical animal studies, has been challenging. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic in vivo preclinical assessment of the efficacy of promising cardioprotective interventions prior to their clinical evaluation. To address this, we propose an in vivo set of step-by-step criteria for IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (‘IMPACT’), for investigators to consider adopting before embarking on clinical studies, the aim of which is to improve the likelihood of translating novel cardioprotective interventions into the clinical setting for patient benefit.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Comparison of Mortality Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients With or Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases have decreased in part due to the advent of targeted therapies for standard modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors (SMuRF). Recent studies have reported that ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without SMuRF (termed “SMuRF-less”) may be increasing in prevalence and have worse outcomes than “SMuRF-positive” patients. As these studies have been limited to STEMI and comprised mainly Caucasian cohorts, we investigated the changes in the prevalence and mortality of both SMuRF-less STEMI and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients in a multiethnic Asian population. Methods: We evaluated 23,922 STEMI and 62,631 NSTEMI patients from a national multiethnic registry. Short-term cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities in SMuRF-less patients were compared to SMuRF-positive patients. Results: The proportions of SMuRF-less STEMI but not of NSTEMI have increased over the years. In hospitals, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and 1-year cardiovascular mortality were significantly higher in SMuRF-less STEMI after adjustment for age, creatinine, and hemoglobin. However, this difference did not remain after adjusting for anterior infarction, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and Killip class. There were no differences in mortality in SMuRF-less NSTEMI. In contrast to Chinese and Malay patients, SMuRF-less patients of South Asian descent had a two-fold higher risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality even after adjusting for features of increased disease severity. Conclusion: SMuRF-less patients had an increased risk of mortality with STEMI, suggesting that there may be unidentified nonstandard risk factors predisposing SMuRF-less patients to a worse prognosis. This group of patients may benefit from more intensive secondary prevention strategies to improve clinical outcomes

Mitochondrial respiratory inhibition by 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM): implications for culturing isolated mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes

10.14814/phy2.12606Physiological reports4

Limitation of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in clinical practice: new hopes and disappointments

Item does not contain fulltex

Erythropoietin: ready for prime-time cardioprotection.

Contains fulltext : 70375.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)To improve clinical outcomes in patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction, new strategies to limit infarct size and postinfarct remodelling are warranted. Recent animal studies have revealed that erythropoietin has the potential to achieve both these goals. Even more intriguing is the possibility that erythropoietin could protect the myocardium when administered well after the onset of reperfusion. In this article we review the evidence in favour of erythropoietin-induced cardioprotection and the proposed underlying mechanisms. Inhibition of apoptosis and inflammation, as well as stimulation of neovascularization, all could contribute to cardioprotection. Activation of the reperfusion injury salvage kinase pathway at the moment of reperfusion appears to be a pivotal mechanism in the infarct size-limiting effect. Now that recent evidence has proven that erythropoietin also can protect the human heart, studies currently are being undertaken to examine the effect of administration of erythropoietin in patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction

Reducing myocardial infarct size: Challenges and future opportunities

10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307855Heart1025341-34

Contrast-induced nephropathy following angiography and cardiac interventions

10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306962Heart1028638-64

Co-dependence of the neural and humoral pathways in the mechanism of remote ischemic conditioning

10.1007/s00395-016-0568-zBasic Research in Cardiology11145