15 research outputs found

    Cognitive testing following transient ischaemic attack: A systematic review of clinical assessment tools

    No full text
    Cognitive deficits are prevalent after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and result in loss of function, poorer quality of life and increased risks of dependency and mortality. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on cognitive assessment in TIA patients to determine the prevalence of cognitive deficits, and the optimal tests for cognitive assessment. Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant articles. Articles were screened by title and abstract. Full-text analysis and quality assessment was performed using the National Institute of Health Tool. Data were extracted on study characteristics, prevalence of TIA deficits, and key study findings. Due to significant heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible. Twenty-five full-text articles met the review inclusion criteria. There was significant heterogeneity in terms of cognitive tests used, definitions of cognitive impairment and TIA, time points post-event, and analysis methods. The majority of studies used the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (n = 23). Prevalence of cognitive impairment ranged from 2% to 100%, depending on the time-point and cognitive domain studied. The MoCA was more sensitive than the MMSE for identifying cognitive deficits. Deficits were common in executive function, attention, and language. No studies assessed diagnostic test accuracy against a reference standard diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Recommendations on cognitive testing after TIA are hampered by significant heterogeneity between studies, as well as a lack of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Future research should focus on harmonising tools, definitions, and time-points, and validating tools specifically for the TIA population

    Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in the assessment of neurovascular coupling responses to cognitive examination in healthy controls: A feasibility study.

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that paradigms from the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III), including those that had not been studied using TCD previously (novel) versus those which had been (established), would elicit changes in CBF velocity (CBFv). NEW METHOD: Healthy subjects were studied with bilateral transcranial Doppler (TCD), beat-to-beat blood pressure (Finapres), continuous electrocardiogram (ECG), and end-tidal CO2 (nasal capnography). After a 5-min baseline recording, cognitive tests of the ACE-III were presented to subjects, covering attention (SUB7, subtracting 7 from 100 sequentially), language (REP, repeating words and phrases), fluency (N-P, naming words), visuospatial (DRAW, clock-drawing), and memory (MEM, recalling name and address). An event marker noted question timing. RESULTS: Forty bilateral data sets were obtained (13 males, 37 right-hand dominant) with a median age of 31 years (IQR 22-52). Population normalized mean peak CBFv% in the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres, respectively, were: SUB7 (11.3±9.6%, 11.2±10.5%), N-P (12.7±11.7%, 11.5±12.0%), REP (12.9±11.7%, 11.6±11.6%), DRAW (13.3±11.7%, 13.2±15.4%) and MEM (13.2±10.3%, 12.0±10.1%). There was a significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant CBFv responses (p<0.008), but no difference between the amplitude of responses. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: For established paradigms, our results are in excellent agreement to what has been found previously in the middle cerebral artery. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive paradigms derived from the ACE-III led to significant lateralised changes in CBFv that were not distinct for novel paradigms. Further work is needed to assess the potential of paradigms to improve the interpretation of cognitive assessments in patients at risk of mild cognitive impairment

    Effects of brain training on brain blood flow (The Cognition and Flow Study-CogFlowS): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of cognitive training in dementia.

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Cognitive training is an emerging non-pharmacological treatment to improve cognitive and physical function in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Abnormal brain blood flow is a key process in the development of cognitive decline. However, no studies have explored the effects of cognitive training on brain blood flow in dementia. The primary aim of this study is to assess the feasibility for a large-scale, randomised controlled trial of cognitive training in healthy older adults (HC), MCI and early AD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will recruit 60 participants, in three subgroups of 20 (MCI, HC, AD), from primary, secondary and community services. Participants will be randomised to a 12-week computerised cognitive training programme (five × 30 min sessions per week), or waiting-list control. Participants will undergo baseline and follow-up assessments of: mood, cognition, quality of life and activities of daily living. Cerebral blood flow will be measured at rest and during task activation (pretraining and post-training) by bilateral transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, alongside heart rate (3-lead ECG), end-tidal CO2 (capnography) and beat-to-beat blood pressure (Finometer). Participants will be offered to join a focus group or semistructured interview to explore barriers and facilitators to cognitive training in patients with dementia. Qualitative data will be analysed using framework analysis, and data will be integrated using mixed methods matrices. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Bradford Leeds Research Ethics committee awarded a favourable opinion (18/YH/0396). Results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and presented at national and international conferences on ageing and dementia. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03656107; Pre-results

    Polypharmacy in older vascular surgery inpatients

    Full text link
    Introduction: Polypharmacy is common in older people and is associated with mortality and hospital readmission. The prevalence of polypharmacy in vascular patients is not well described. Methods: Retrospective audit of all patients aged >65 years admitted to a single vascular surgery unit for ≥24 hours during a 10-week study period (20/4/17 – 28/6/17). Data collected included age, gender, admission type, diagnoses, medications and length of stay (LoS). Results: 87 admissions were included. Mean age was 78 [±7.6], 67 [77.0%] patients were male, 63 [72.4%] had unplanned admissions and 40 [46.0%] were admitted with severe limb ischaemia. Median number of medications on admission was 8 [IQR:6-10]. Excessive polypharmacy (defined as ≥10 medications) was present in 27 [31.0%] patients and was not associated with age, gender, admission type or diagnosis (binary logistic regression analysis). Overall, median LoS was 6 days [IQR:3-11.5] and was similar in patients with and without excessive polypharmacy (7 days [IQR:2.5-11.5] vs 6 days [IQR:3-11.25] respectively). 40 [46.0%] patients were discharged on ≥1 more medications than admission; only 9 [10.3%] patients were discharged on ≥1 fewer medications. 33 [37.9%] patients were discharged on more than three high-risk medications, with the only associated patient factor being number of high-risk medications on admission [OR=15.80; 95%CI=3.03-34.80; p<.001] (ordinal logistic regression analysis). Conclusion: Polypharmacy, including prescription of multiple high-risk medications, is highly prevalent amongst older vascular surgery inpatients. Further research is needed to understand the association of polypharmacy on outcomes and determine strategies to reduce the prescribing of unnecessary medications. Take-home message: Polypharmacy is common amongst older vascular surgery inpatients although more research is needed to understand its associations with outcomes from vascular surgery

    The role of the autonomic nervous system in cerebral blood flow regulation in dementia: A review

    No full text
    In this review we will examine the role of the autonomic nervous system in the control of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in dementia. Worldwide, 55 million people currently live with dementia, and this figure will increase as the global population ages. Understanding the changes in vascular physiology in dementia could pave the way for novel therapeutic approaches. Reductions in CBF have been demonstrated in multiple dementia sub-types, in addition to increased cerebrovascular resistance and reduced vasoreactivity. Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is a key mechanism for the maintenance of cerebral perfusion, but remains largely intact in cognitive disorders, despite reductions in global and regional CBF. However, the tight coupling between neuronal activity and CBF (neurovascular coupling - NVC) is lost in dementia, which may be a key driver of cognitive dysfunction. Despite numerous studies investigating disturbances in the control of CBF in dementia, less is known about the specific mechanisms responsible for the observed changes. Disturbances could be related to one of a number of pathways and mechanisms including disruption of the autonomic component. In this review we will explore clinical and animal studies, which specifically investigated the autonomic component of CBF control in dementia, drawing on the clinical implications and potential for novel biomarker and therapeutic targets

    Frailty factors and outcomes in vascular surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Full text link
    Objective To describe and critique tools used to assess frailty in vascular surgery patients, and investigate its associations with patient factors and outcomes. Background Increasing evidence shows negative impacts of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients, but little investigation of its associations with patient factors has been undertaken. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting frailty in vascular surgery patients (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018116253) searching Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus. Quality of studies was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa scores (NOS) and quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. Associations of frailty with patient factors were investigated by difference in means (MD) or expressed as risk ratios (RR), and associations with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR). Data were pooled using random effects models. Results Fifty-three studies were included in the review and only 8 (15%) were both good quality (NOS ≥7) and used a well-validated frailty measure. Eighteen studies (62,976 patients) provided data for the meta-analysis. Frailty was associated with increased age (MD 4.05 years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.35, 4.75), female sex (RR 1.32; 95%CI 1.14, 1.54), and lower body-mass index (MD -1.81; 95%CI -2.94, -0.68). Frailty was associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted [A]OR 2.77; 95%CI 2.01-3.81), post-operative complications (AOR 2.16; 95%CI 1.55, 3.02) and long-term mortality (HR 1.85; 95%CI 1.31, 2.62). Sarcopenia was not associated with any outcomes. Conclusion Frailty, but not sarcopenia, is associated with worse outcomes in vascular surgery patients. Well-validated frailty assessment tools should be preferred clinically, and in future research.</div
    corecore