Enhancing rare variant interpretation in inherited arrhythmias through quantitative analysis of consortium disease cohorts and population controls.

PURPOSE: Stringent variant interpretation guidelines can lead to high rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) for genetically heterogeneous disease like long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS). Quantitative and disease-specific customization of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines can address this false negative rate. METHODS: We compared rare variant frequencies from 1847 LQTS (KCNQ1/KCNH2/SCN5A) and 3335 BrS (SCN5A) cases from the International LQTS/BrS Genetics Consortia to population-specific gnomAD data and developed disease-specific criteria for ACMG/AMP evidence classes-rarity (PM2/BS1 rules) and case enrichment of individual (PS4) and domain-specific (PM1) variants. RESULTS: Rare SCN5A variant prevalence differed between European (20.8%) and Japanese (8.9%) BrS patients (p = 5.7 × 10-18) and diagnosis with spontaneous (28.7%) versus induced (15.8%) Brugada type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) (p = 1.3 × 10-13). Ion channel transmembrane regions and specific N-terminus (KCNH2) and C-terminus (KCNQ1/KCNH2) domains were characterized by high enrichment of case variants and >95% probability of pathogenicity. Applying the customized rules, 17.4% of European BrS and 74.8% of European LQTS cases had (likely) pathogenic variants, compared with estimated diagnostic yields (case excess over gnomAD) of 19.2%/82.1%, reducing VUS prevalence to close to background rare variant frequency. CONCLUSION: Large case-control data sets enable quantitative implementation of ACMG/AMP guidelines and increased sensitivity for inherited arrhythmia genetic testing

Human model simulating right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia by high-frequency stimulation in the left pulmonary artery: Autonomics and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias

PubMed ID: 19298565Autonomics and Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias. Introduction: Frequent monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and/or ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structurally normal heart usually arise from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). An animal model simulating RVOT tachycardia by high-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the sympathetic input to the proximal pulmonary artery (PA) has been previously described. The aim of this study was to similarly induce RVOT tachycardia in humans. Methods: In 9 patients with no history of ventricular arrhythmias, a circumferential catheter was placed in the left, main, and proximal PA to contact the endovascular circumference of the PA. A 50-ms train of HFS (200 Hz/0.3 ms pulse duration), coupled to atrial pacing, was applied at each bipolar pair of the circumferential catheter. The coupling interval was adjusted so that the 50-ms train occurred during the ventricular refractory period. Results: In 6 out of 9 patients, HFS in the left PA during dobutamine infusion induced monomorphic PVCs and/or VT with left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology and inferior axis at an average stimulation level of 12.5 ± 2.7 V. HFS in the main PA and in the proximal PA did not induce any ventricular arrhythmias with the highest energy of 15 V in baseline state and during dobutamine infusion. HFS in the left PA was associated with hiccough in all patients. Conclusion: Stimulation of the sympathetic input to the left PA during dobutamine infusion induces PVCs and/or VT exhibiting LBBB-morphology and inferior axis, closely simulating clinical RVOT tachycardia in humans. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 20, pp. 759-763, July 2009) © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Acute myocardial infarction following an arthropod bite: Is hereditary thrombophilia a contributing factor?

PubMed ID: 16988555Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to arthropod envenomation has rarely been reported in the literature. In the present report, we describe two cases who developed AMI following an arthropod bite. Coronary angiograms revealed normal coronary arteries in both patients. Both events were probably secondary to coronary artery thrombosis and/or coronary artery vasospasm. Both patients were subsequently found to be heterozygous for prothrombin mutation (G20210A). As a result, we recommend ruling out the possibility of hereditary thrombophilias in young patients with AMI developing after an arthropod bite. © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins