Establishment of Valid Laboratory Case Definition for Human Leptospirosis

Laboratory case definition of leptospirosis is scarcely de ned by a solid evaluation that determines cut-off values in the tests that are applied. This study describes the process of determining optimal cut-off titers of laboratory tests for leptospirosis for a valid case definition of leptospirosis. In this case the tests are the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and an in-house IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) both on single serum and paired samples using a positive culture as the reference test in the Dutch population. The specificity was assessed using panels of sera from healthy donors, cases with known other diseases and non-leptospirosis cases with symptoms compatible with leptospirosis. Cases were divided into three periods corroborating the acute phase (1-10 days post onset of illness (DPO)), the early convalescent (11-20 DPO) and the late convalescent phase (>20 DPO). Cut-off titers for MAT and IgM ELISA were determined as 1:160 and 1:80 respectively for all three periods. These cut-off titers combined 100% specificity with a sensitivity that changed according to the stage of disease for both tests. The low sensitivities in the early acute phase are consistent with the dynamics of the humoral immune response. IgM ELISA yielded higher sensitivities compared to MAT in the acute and early convalescent stages. Moreover, the optimal sensitivity of MAT, the gold standard was < 82%, implying that a significant part of global cases is missed by this recommended test. MAT and IgM ELISA manifested partly complementary, resulting in a higher sensitivity when combining the results of these two tests. The availability of paired samples and of adequate clinical and epidemiological data are other parameters that

Are pathogenic leptospira species agents of community-acquired pneumonia? case reports of leptospirosis presenting as pneumonia

We report four Indonesian cases meeting the clinical and radiological criteria for community-acquired pneumonia and other findings suggestive of leptospirosis. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses of serum and urine samples and serology confirmed the diagnosis of leptospirosis in each. Results of qPCR analysis of throat swabs were concordant with those obtained with acutephase serum samples, which suggests its potential for use as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for leptospirosis

Prospective evaluation of three rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosis of human leptospirosis.

Diagnosis of leptospirosis by the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) or by culture is confined to specialized laboratories. Although ELISA techniques are more common, they still require laboratory facilities. Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) can be used for easy point-of-care diagnosis. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the RDTs LeptoTek Dri Dot, LeptoTek Lateral Flow, and Leptocheck-WB, prospectively. During 2001 to 2012, one or two of the RDTs at the same time have been applied prior to routine diagnostics (MAT, ELISA and culture) on serum specimens from participants sent in for leptospirosis diagnosis. The case definition was based on MAT, ELISA and culture results. Participants not fulfilling the case definition were considered not to have leptospirosis. The diagnostic accuracy was determined based on the 1(st) submitted sample and paired samples, either in an overall analysis or stratified according to days post onset of illness. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the LeptoTek Dri Dot was 75% respectively 96%, for the LeptoTek Lateral Flow 78% respectively 95%, and for the Leptocheck-WB 78% respectively 98%. Based on the 1(st) submitted sample the sensitivity was low (51% for LeptoTek Dri Dot, 69% for LeptoTek Lateral Flow, and 55% for Leptocheck-WB), but substantially increased when the results of paired samples were combined, although accompanied by a lower specificity (82% respectively 91% for LeptoTek Dri Dot, 86% respectively 84% for LeptoTek Lateral Flow, and 80% respectively 93% for Leptocheck-WB). All three tests present antibody tests contributing to the diagnosis of leptospirosis, thus supporting clinical suspicion and contributing to awareness. Since the overall sensitivity of the tested RDTs did not exceed 80%, one should be cautious to rely only on an RDT result, and confirmation by reference tests is strongly recommended

The hanta hunting study: Underdiagnosis of puumala hantavirus infections in symptomatic non-travelling leptospirosis-suspected patients in the Netherlands, in 2010 and April to November 2011

Leptospirosis and haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) are hard to distinguish clinically since these two important rodent-borne zoonoses share hallmark symptoms such as renal failure and haemorrhage. Leptospirosis is caused by infection with a spirochete while HFRS is the result of an infection with certain hantaviruses. Both diseases are relatively rare in the Netherlands. Increased incidence of HFRS has been observed since 2007 in countries that border the Netherlands. Since a similar rise in incidence has not been registered in the Netherlands, we hypothesise that due to overlapping clinical manifestations, hantavirus infections may be confused with leptospirosis, leading to underdiagnosis. Therefore, we tested a cohort of non-travelling Dutch patients with symptoms compatible with leptospirosis, but with a negative diagnosis, during 2010 and from April to November 2011. Sera were screened with pan-hantavirus IgG and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Sera with IgM reactivity were tested by immunofluorescence assay (IFA). ELISA (IgM positive) and IFA results were confirmed using focus reduction neutralisation tests (FRNTs). We found hantavirus-specific IgG and/or IgM antibodies in 4.3% (11/255) of samples taken in 2010 and in 4.1% (6/146) of the samples during the 2011 period. After FRNT confirmation, seven patients were classed as having acute Puumala virus infections. A review of hantavirus diagnostic requests revealed that at least three of the seven confirmed acute cases as well as seven probable acute cases of hantavirus infection were missed in the Netherlands during the study period

Critical analysis: use of polymerase chain reaction to diagnose leprosy

ABSTRACT Leprosy is a neglected tropical disease and an important public health problem, especially in developing countries. It is a chronic infectious disease that is caused by Mycobacterium leprae, which has a predilection for the skin and peripheral nerves. Although it has low sensitivity, slit-skin smear (SSS) remains the conventional auxiliary laboratory technique for the clinical diagnosis of leprosy. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular biology technique that holds promise as a simple and sensitive diagnostic tool. In the present study, the performance of two PCR methods, using different targets, PCR-LP and PCR-P, were compared with SSS with regard to leprosy diagnosis in a reference laboratory. M. leprae DNA was extracted from 106 lymph samples of 40 patients who had clinical suspicion of leprosy. The samples were subjected to both PCR techniques and SSS. Amplification of the human b-globin gene was used as PCR inhibitor control. The specificity of both PCR techniques was 100%, and sensitivity was 0.007 and 0.015 µg/ml for PCR-LP and PCR-P, respectively. No significant difference was found between either the PCR-LP or PCR-P results and SSS results (p > 0.05). Although PCR is not yet a replacement for SSS in the diagnosis of leprosy, this technique may be used as an efficient auxiliary tool for early detection of the disease, especially in endemic regions. This strategy may also be useful in cases in which SSS results are negative (e.g., in paucibacillary patients) and cases in which skin biopsy cannot be performed

Curva de anticorpos pós-vacinais em ovinos imunizados com uma ou duas doses de bacterina oleosa anti-leptospirose, produzida com a sorovariedade Hardjo, tipo Hardjoprajitno, estirpe Norma, isolada no Brasil

Foi comparado o nível de anticorpos de ovelhas imunizadas com uma ou duas doses de bacterina oleosa produzida com a sorovariedade Hardjo, tipo Hardjoprajitno, estirpe Norma, isolada da urina de bovino no Brasil. Culturas de 2x10(8) leptospiras/mL foram inativadas com formalina a 0,3%, à concentração final e emulsionada em óleo Emulsigen® 12%. A dose da vacina foi padronizada para a concentração de 1x10(8) leptospiras/mL. Quarenta ovinos adultos, da raça Santa Inês, de um rebanho livre de leptospirose por exames clínicos e sorológicos durante um ano foram escolhidos para o experimento. O grupo A (n=15) recebeu duas doses de 3,0mL da vacina por via subcutânea, com intervalo de 30 dias. O grupo B (n=15) recebeu dose única de 3,0mL, via subcutânea e o grupo C (controle) recebeu uma dose subcutânea de 3,0mL de solução 0,85% de cloreto de sódio. Os títulos de anticorpos pós-vacinação foram mensurados pelo teste de soroaglutinação microscópica (SAM) e um teste imunoenzimático (ELISA) a cada 30 dias durante 120 dias. Os títulos dos grupos A e B na primeira colheita variaram de 80 a 160. No grupo A, após a segunda dose, os títulos aumentaram duas a quatro vezes, até 3.200, enquanto no grupo B os títulos de aglutininas foram menores que 160 e diminuíram uma a duas vezes após 60 dias da vacinação. Utilizando-se dose única, os anticorpos persistiram por somente 30 dias e, com duas doses, com 30 dias de intervalo, os anticorpos foram detectáveis por 60 dias por meio do teste de SAM e 120 dias no teste de ELISA. Assim, o teste de SAM detectou títulos de IgM vacinal somente por 60 dias, enquanto o teste de ELISA foi capaz de detectar anticorpos durante os 120 dias. No grupo controle negativo, ocorreram no ELISA reações inespecíficas de títulos até 80, porém no SAM os títulos dos mesmos animais se mantiveram em zero. O teste de ELISA pode ser utilizado para medir anticorpos vacinais para a sorovariedade Hardjo, tipo Hardjoprajitno, estirpe Norma em ovinos