The Nijmegen Questionnaire and dysfunctional breathing

The Nijmegen Questionnaire is useful to quantify and assess the normality of subjective sensations http://ow.ly/MBJj

Spirometry in general practice: the performance of practice assistants

Contains fulltext : 23014___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

The effect of inspired oxygen fraction on peak oxygen uptake during arm exercise

Item does not contain fulltextIt has been shown that peak oxygen uptake (O(2)peak) during leg exercise is enhanced by an increased inspiratory oxygen fraction ( FiO(2)), indicating that oxygen supply is the limiting factor. Whether oxygen supply is a limiting factor in arm exercise performance is unknown. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the effect of different levels of FiO(2 )on O(2)peak during arm exercise in healthy individuals. Nine men successfully performed three incremental arm-cranking exercise tests with FiO(2)15%, FiO(2)21% and FiO(2)50% applied in counterbalanced order. A significant FiO(2 )dependency was observed for O(2)peak ( p=0.02) and power output ( p=0.03) and post hoc tests revealed a significant difference in O(2)peak between 15 and 50% FiO(2 )( p=0.02), but not between 15 and 21% FiO(2), and 21 and 50% FiO(2). The results of this study show that O(2)peak is enhanced with increasing FiO(2), and suggest that O(2)peak during arm exercise is limited by oxygen supply rather than by the metabolic machinery within the muscle itself

Early intervention with inhaled corticosteroids in subjects with rapid decline in lung function and signs of bronchial hyperresponsiveness: results from the DIMCA programme.

Contains fulltext : 51862.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Asthma is generally accepted as an inflammatory disease that needs steroid treatment. However, when to start with inhaled steroids remains unclear. A study was undertaken to determine when inhaled corticosteroids should be introduced as the first treatment step. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of early introduction of inhaled steroids on decline in lung function in steroid-naive subjects with a rapid decline in lung function in general practice. SUBJECTS: Patients with signs/symptoms suspect of asthma (i.e., persistent and/or recurrent respiratory symptoms) and a decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) during 1-year monitoring of 0.080 l or more and reversible obstruction (> or =10% predicted) or bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC(20)< or =8 mg/ml) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening aiming to detect subjects at risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. DESIGN: A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. METHODS: 75 subjects out of a random population of 1155 were found eligible, and 45 were willingly to participate. Subjects were randomly treated with placebo or fluticasone propionate 250 microg b.i.d., and FEV(1) and PC(20) were monitored over a 2-year period. OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome measure was decline in FEV(1); the secondary outcome measure was bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC(20)). RESULTS: 22 subjects were randomly allocated to the active group with inhaled corticosteroids and 23 to placebo. Change of FEV(1) in the active treated group was +43 ml in post-bronchodilator FEV(1) (p =0.341) and +62 ml/year (p =0.237) in pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) after 1 year, and -22 ml (p =0.304) for post-bronchodilator FEV(1) and -9.4 ml (p =0.691) for pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) after 2 years, compared to placebo. The effect on PC(20) was almost one dose-step (p =0.627) after 1 year and one dose-step (p =0.989) after 2 years. CONCLUSION: In this study, the early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in newly diagnosed asthmatic subjects with rapid decline in lung function did not prove to be either clinically relevant or statistically significant in reversing the decline in FEV(1). For PC(20), no significant changes were detected

Xanthine oxidase is involved in exercise-induced oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

In the present study, we hypothesized that exhaustive exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) results in glutathione oxidation and lipid peroxidation and that xanthine oxidase (XO) contributes to free radical generation during exercise. COPD patients performed incremental cycle ergometry until exhaustion with (n=8) or without (n=8) prior treatment with allopurinol, an XO inhibitor. Reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and lipid peroxides [malondialdehyde (MDA)] were measured in arterial blood. In nontreated COPD patients, maximal exercise (~75 W) resulted in a significant increase in the GSSG-to-GSH ratio (4.6 ± 0.9% at rest vs. 9.3 ± 1.7% after exercise). In nontreated patients, MDA- increased from 0.68 ± 0.08 nmol/ml at rest up to 1.32 ± 0.13 nmol/ml 60 min after cessation of exercise. In contrast, in patients treated with allopurinol, GSSG-to-GSH ratio did not increase in response to exercise (5.0 ± 1.2% preexercise vs. 4.6 ± 1.1% after exercise). Plasma lipid peroxide formation was also inhibited by allopurinol pretreatment (0.72 ± 0.15 nmol/ml preexercise vs. 0.64 ± 0.09 nmol/m160 min after exercise). We conclude that strenuous exercise in COPD patients results in blood glutathione oxidation and lipid peroxidation. This can be inhibited by treatment with allopurinol, indicating that XO is an important source for free radical generation during exercise in COPD

Two-year bronchodilator treatment in patients with mild airflow obstruction: contradictory effects on lung function and quality of life

In a two-year randomized controlled study, we studied the effects of bronchodilator treatment on the lung function and the quality of life in patients with mild airflow obstruction. The patients were randomly divided to receive either continuous or symptomatic bronchodilator treatment. Within these treatment groups, they received salbutamol in the first year and ipratropium bromide in the second or vice versa. In addition, the quality of life of the patients was compared to that of the general population. One hundred and forty-four patients completed the study. When compared to the general population, these patients showed a serious impairment in quality of life. No differences between the two drugs were found, but the results indicated that FEV1 decline in the continuously treated group was significantly larger than in the symptomatically treated group. However, this was not reflected in a significant deterioration of the quality of life in the continuous group as measured by means of the Nottingham Health Profile and the Inventory of Subjective Health. Decline in FEV1 showed no correlation with changes in quality of life scores. This may be due to a relatively rapid adjustment of the patients to a decline in FEV1, as a result of which it has no direct effect on the experienced quality of life. Another reason may be that continuous bronchodilation masks the worsening of the disease. This lack of awareness might in turn be caused by the continuous symptom relief of bronchodilators

Two-year bronchodilator treatment in patients with mild airflow obstruction: Contradictory effects on lung function and quality of life

In a two-year randomized controlled study, we studied the effects of bronchodilator treatment on the lung function and the quality of life in patients with mild airflow obstruction. The patients were randomly divided to receive either continuous or symptomatic bronchodilator treatment. Within these treatment groups, they received salbutamol in the first year and ipratropium bromide in the second or vice versa. In addition, the quality of life of the patients was compared to that of the general population. One hundred and forty-four patients completed the study. When compared to the general population, these patients showed a serious impairment in quality of life. No differences between the two drugs were found, but the results indicated that FEV1 decline in the continuously treated group was significantly larger than in the symptomatically treated group. However, this was not reflected in a significant deterioration of the quality of life in the continuous group as measured by means of the Nottingham Health Profile and the Inventory of Subjective Health. Decline in FEV1 showed no correlation with changes in quality of life scores. This may be due to a relatively rapid adjustment of the patients to a decline in FEV1, as a result of which it has no direct effect on the experienced quality of life. Another reason may be that continuous bronchodilation masks the worsening of the disease. This lack of awareness might in turn be caused by the continuous symptom relief of bronchodilators