50 research outputs found

    Counterfactuality, Definiteness, and Bell's Theorem

    Full text link
    We show counterfactual definiteness separates classical from quantum physics, by analysing Bell's Theorem. By comparing what it prohibited by various interpretations, we show most interpretations just require counterfactual semi-definiteness (the definiteness of possible options available after a measurement event), rather than full counterfactual indefiniteness. While less definite than classical counterfactual definiteness, it allows us a far more sophisticated tool to consider the physical interpretation of multi-valued variables in a not yet done. Working from this, we further consider its relation to how counterfactual possibilities interact.Comment: 5+1 pages, edited for clarity and concisenes

    The wave function as a true ensemble

    Get PDF

    Counterfactual Ghost Imaging

    Get PDF
    We give a protocol for ghost imaging in a way that is always counterfactual - while imaging an object, no light interacts with that object. This extends the idea of counterfactuality beyond communication, showing how this interesting phenomenon can be leveraged for metrology. Given, in the infinite limit, no photons ever go to the imaged object, it presents a method of imaging even the most light-sensitive of objects without damaging them. Even when not in the infinite limit, it still provides a many-fold improvement in visibility and signal-to-noise ratio over previous protocols, with over an order of magnitude reduction in absorbed intensity.Comment: 7 pages, 6 figures, matches published versio

    Do the laws of physics prohibit counterfactual communication?

    Full text link
    It has been conjectured that counterfactual communication is impossible, even for post-selected quantum particles. We strongly challenge this by proposing exactly such a counterfactual scheme where---unambiguously---none of Alice's photons that make it has been to Bob. We demonstrate counterfactuality theoretically and experimentally by means of weak measurements, as well as conceptually using consistent histories. Importantly, the accuracy of Alice learning Bob's bit can be made arbitrarily close to unity with no trace left by Bob on Alice's photon.Comment: Experiment conducted in the lab, showing no weak trace from Bob at either D0 or D1. 5 pages, 5 figure

    What does it take to solve the measurement problem?

    Get PDF

    Comment on "Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell-inequality violations via statistical model selection"

    Full text link
    In a recent paper (Phys. Rev. A 105, 042220 (2022)), Daley et al claim that superdeterministic models are disfavoured against standard quantum mechanics, because such models overfit the statistics of a Bell-type experiment which the authors conducted. We argue here that their claim is based on a misunderstanding of what superdeterministic models are.Comment: 4 pages, no figure

    Comment on ``Scheme of the arrangement for attack on the protocol BB84"

    Get PDF
    In a recent paper (Scheme of the arrangement for attack on the protocol BB84, Optik 127(18):7083-7087, Sept 2016), a protocol was proposed for using weak measurement to attack BB84. This claimed the four basis states typically used could be perfectly discriminated, and so an interceptor could obtain all information carried. We show this attack fails when considered using standard quantum mechanics, as expected - such ``single-shot" quantum state discrimination is impossible, even using weak measurement.Comment: 3 pages, 1 figure, accepted for publication by Opti

    Comment on "Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory" by Catani et al

    Full text link
    It was recently argued by Catani et al that it is possible to reproduce the phenomenology of the double-slit experiment with a deterministic, local, and classical model (arXiv:2111.13727). The stated aim of their argument is to falsify the claim made by Feynman (in his third book of Lectures on Physics) that the double-slit experiment is "impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way" and that it "contains the only mystery" of quantum mechanics. We here want to point out some problems with their argument, and defend Feynman's position.Comment: 3 pages, no figures, comments welcom

    Exchange-Free Ghost Imaging

    Get PDF
    corecore