Evaluation of Voice Disorders: Dysphonia Severity Index and Voice Handicap Index

The voice is arguable still the most important tool of communication despite the growing importance of e-mails and text messaging (SMS) in daily contact. Indeed in modern society people are probably even more dependent on their voice than in the rural societies of old. Approximately one third of the working population nowadays need their voice to earn money1. And it goes without saying that most people need their voice for daily social activities. Any impairment of the voice therefore will have large impact both on daily work and social activities for many people. Diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders is by that of great importance. The voice has a variety of characteristics and so have any of its disorders. The complaints of the patient are the starting point in any diagnosis. These complaints usually consist of ‘my voice is hoarse’. They may also concern the consequences of professional activities, like a teacher whose voice does not reach the back of the classroom, especially in a noisy one. The sound of the voice may have changed and, finally, we have to pay attention to the cause of the problems, the aetiology of the voice disorder. All these aspects need to be assessed in a description of any voice disorder. The complaints of the patient may be collected with a self-evaluation form by the patient him/herself. The character of the sound of the voice (voice quality) can be assessed subjectively with the listening ear of the diagnostician and objectively by instruments. The aetiology is determined by the thorough history taking and physical examination. The form and function of the larynx is examined with, for example, (video)laryngostroboscopy. The outcome of these examinations together leads to a diagnosis, which is the basis for decisions about any modality of treatment including intervention like surgical procedures, voice therapy, medication or any combination of these. The results of these interventions need to be evaluated

The interobserver and test-retest variability of the dysphonia severity index

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the interobserver variability and the test-retest variability of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), a multiparametric instrument to assess voice quality. Methods: The DSI was measured in 30 nonsmoking volunteers without voice complaints or voice disorders by two speech pathologists. The subjects were measured on 3 different days, with an interval of 1 week. Results: The difference in DSI between two observers (interobserver difference) was not significant. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the DSI was 0.79. The standard deviation of the difference between two duplicate measurements by different observers was 1.27. Conclusion: Differences in measurements between different observers were not significant. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the DSI was 0.79, which is to be considered good. Differences in DSI within one patient need to be larger than 2.49 to be significant. Copyrigh

Communicating Emotion:Vocal Expression of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Children With Mild to Profound Hearing Loss Compared With That of Normal Hearing Peers

Objectives: Emotional prosody is known to play an important role in social communication. Research has shown that children with cochlear implants (CCIs) may face challenges in their ability to express prosody, as their expressions may have less distinct acoustic contrasts and therefore may be judged less accurately. The prosody of children with milder degrees of hearing loss, wearing hearing aids, has sparsely been investigated. More understanding of the prosodic expression by children with hearing loss, hearing aid users in particular, could create more awareness among healthcare professionals and parents on limitations in social communication, which awareness may lead to more targeted rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare the prosodic expression potential of children wearing hearing aids (CHA) with that of CCIs and children with normal hearing (CNH). Design: In this prospective experimental study, utterances of pediatric hearing aid users, cochlear implant users, and CNH containing emotional expressions (happy, sad, and angry) were recorded during a reading task. Of the utterances, three acoustic properties were calculated: fundamental frequency (F0), variance in fundamental frequency (SD of F0), and intensity. Acoustic properties of the utterances were compared within subjects and between groups. Results: A total of 75 children were included (CHA: 26, CCI: 23, and CNH: 26). Participants were between 7 and 13 years of age. The 15 CCI with congenital hearing loss had received the cochlear implant at median age of 8 months. The acoustic patterns of emotions uttered by CHA were similar to those of CCI and CNH. Only in CCI, we found no difference in F0 variation between happiness and anger, although an intensity difference was present. In addition, CCI and CHA produced poorer happy-sad contrasts than did CNH. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that on a fundamental, acoustic level, both CHA and CCI have a prosodic expression potential that is almost on par with normal hearing peers. However, there were some minor limitations observed in the prosodic expression of these children, it is important to determine whether these differences are perceptible to listeners and could affect social communication. This study sets the groundwork for more research that will help us fully understand the implications of these findings and how they may affect the communication abilities of these children. With a clearer understanding of these factors, we can develop effective ways to help improve their communication skills.</p

Quality of life and voice outcome of patients treated with transoral CO2 laser microsurgery for early glottic carcinoma (T1-T2): a 2-year follow-up study

Purpose Longitudinal studies in laryngeal cancer can provide clinicians information about short-term and long-term functional outcomes, like quality of life (QoL) and voice outco

Structure and Function of the Vocal Cords after Airway Reconstruction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objectives/Hypothesis: Dysphonia is a common problem at long-term follow-up after airway surgery for laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) with major impact on quality of life. Dysphonia after LTS can be caused by scar tissue from initial stenosis along with anatomical alterations after surgery. There is need for a modality to noninvasively image structure and function of the reconstructed upper airways including the vocal cords to assess voice outcom

Voice outcome after unilateral ELS type III or bilateral type II resections for T1-T2 glottic carcinoma: Results after 1 year

Abstract Background: Voice outcome was assessed in patients with extended T1 and limited T2 glottic carcinoma, treated with a unilateral type III or a bilateral type II resection according to the European Laryngological Society (ELS) classification. Methods: Objective evaluation (acoustic and aerodynamic parameters), perceptual evaluation (GRBAS), and patients' self-assessment (voice handicap index [VHI]) were performed before and 1 year after treatment. Results were evaluated according to ELS resection type and the involvement of the anterior commissure. Results: The majority of voice parameters in all resection subgroups showed an improvement of the mean score 1 year postoperatively. Grade of dysphonia varied between 1.15 and 1.66 postoperatively and VHI score varied from 23.3 to 24.5. Conclusion: Voice outcome after ELS unilateral type III or a bilateral type II resection for extended T1 and limited T2 glottic carcinoma is good with mild to very moderate perceptive dysphonia and low self-reported voice impairment