Affects, urges and sexuality in love and hate

Odnos i definicija ljubavi i mržnje su opisane na različite načine. Freud ih je smatrao kao dvije sile koje su pokretačice svijeta, sile koje su u međusobnoj borbi i koje formiraju smisao života i smjer života. Zamišljene kao dva pola na magnetu, suprotne a opet nerazdvojive. Kernberg smatra da su to oblici nediferenciranih afekata koji su glavni motivatori kompleksne naravi, na temelju kojih se formiraju nagoni. Klein ih je vidjela kao prve djetetove psihološke razvojne korake iznimno važne da bi dijete moglo imati zrele i zdrave odnose u odraslom dobu. Dijete se uči kako tolerirati različite polarne osjećaje, pa tako i ljubav i mržnju, počevši od majčine dojke. Stromberg zaključuje kako je ta borba između dviju sila vječna u nama i međusobno. Bergmann smatra kako je ljubav nužna, da smo ovisna bića o njoj. Winnicott ih je opisao u kontinuiranom međusobnom plesu. Suttie je naglasio da je ljubav socijalno, kulturološki i civilizacijski izgrađena na temeljima potrebe za preživljavanjem i sigurnošću, a mržnja nastaje iz frustrirajuće ljubavi. Mnogi drugi su također opisali podrijetlo ljubavi i mržnje te njihove uloge. Opisana je bitnost njihova formiranja od najranijeg djetinjstva preko životnih iskustava čiji utjecaj se projicira kroz naše adultne odnose i svakodnevicu. Različita nova istraživanja su dokazala povezanost ova dva afekta, njihovo ispreplitanje te tankoću te granice.The relationship and definition of love and hate are described in different ways. Freud considered them as two forces that are the movers of the world, forces that are in mutual struggle and that form the meaning of life and the direction of life. Conceived as two poles on a magnet, opposite and yet inseparable. Kernberg believes that these are forms of undifferentiated affects that are the main motivators of a complex nature, on the basis of which instincts are formed. Klein saw them as the child’s first psychological developmental steps extremely important for a child to have mature and healthy relationships in adulthood. The child learns how to tolerate different polar feelings, including love and hate, starting with the mother's breast. Stromberg concludes that this struggle between the two forces is eternal in us and with each other. Bergmann believes that love is necessary, that we are dependent beings on it. Winnicott described them in a continuous dance with each other. Suttie stressed that love is socially, culturally, and civilizationally built on the foundations of the need for survival and security, and hatred arises from frustrating love. Many others also described the origins of love and hate and their role. The importance of their formation from the earliest childhood through life experiences is described, the influence of which is projected through our adult relationships and everyday life. Various new studies have proven the connection between these two affects, their intertwining and the subtlety of their boundary

Affects, urges and sexuality in love and hate

Odnos i definicija ljubavi i mržnje su opisane na različite načine. Freud ih je smatrao kao dvije sile koje su pokretačice svijeta, sile koje su u međusobnoj borbi i koje formiraju smisao života i smjer života. Zamišljene kao dva pola na magnetu, suprotne a opet nerazdvojive. Kernberg smatra da su to oblici nediferenciranih afekata koji su glavni motivatori kompleksne naravi, na temelju kojih se formiraju nagoni. Klein ih je vidjela kao prve djetetove psihološke razvojne korake iznimno važne da bi dijete moglo imati zrele i zdrave odnose u odraslom dobu. Dijete se uči kako tolerirati različite polarne osjećaje, pa tako i ljubav i mržnju, počevši od majčine dojke. Stromberg zaključuje kako je ta borba između dviju sila vječna u nama i međusobno. Bergmann smatra kako je ljubav nužna, da smo ovisna bića o njoj. Winnicott ih je opisao u kontinuiranom međusobnom plesu. Suttie je naglasio da je ljubav socijalno, kulturološki i civilizacijski izgrađena na temeljima potrebe za preživljavanjem i sigurnošću, a mržnja nastaje iz frustrirajuće ljubavi. Mnogi drugi su također opisali podrijetlo ljubavi i mržnje te njihove uloge. Opisana je bitnost njihova formiranja od najranijeg djetinjstva preko životnih iskustava čiji utjecaj se projicira kroz naše adultne odnose i svakodnevicu. Različita nova istraživanja su dokazala povezanost ova dva afekta, njihovo ispreplitanje te tankoću te granice.The relationship and definition of love and hate are described in different ways. Freud considered them as two forces that are the movers of the world, forces that are in mutual struggle and that form the meaning of life and the direction of life. Conceived as two poles on a magnet, opposite and yet inseparable. Kernberg believes that these are forms of undifferentiated affects that are the main motivators of a complex nature, on the basis of which instincts are formed. Klein saw them as the child’s first psychological developmental steps extremely important for a child to have mature and healthy relationships in adulthood. The child learns how to tolerate different polar feelings, including love and hate, starting with the mother's breast. Stromberg concludes that this struggle between the two forces is eternal in us and with each other. Bergmann believes that love is necessary, that we are dependent beings on it. Winnicott described them in a continuous dance with each other. Suttie stressed that love is socially, culturally, and civilizationally built on the foundations of the need for survival and security, and hatred arises from frustrating love. Many others also described the origins of love and hate and their role. The importance of their formation from the earliest childhood through life experiences is described, the influence of which is projected through our adult relationships and everyday life. Various new studies have proven the connection between these two affects, their intertwining and the subtlety of their boundary

Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and Striated, Smooth, and Heart Muscle

First, we review the definitively severed myotendinous junction and recovery by the cytoprotective stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 therapy, its healing that might combine both transected and detached tendon and transected muscle, ligament and bone injuries, applied alone, as native peptide therapy, effective in rat injury, given intraperitoneally or in drinking water or topically, at the site of injury. As a follow up, we reviewed that with the BPC 157 therapy, its cytoprotective ability to organize simultaneous healing of different tissues of and full recovery of the myotendinous junction might represent the particular muscle therapy against distinctive etiopathology muscle disabilities and weakness. In this, BPC 157 therapy might recover many of muscle disabilities (i.e., succinylcholine, vascular occlusion, spinal cord compression, stroke, traumatic brain injury, severe electrolyte disturbances, neurotoxins, neuroleptics, alcohol, serotonin syndrome and NO-system blockade and tumor-cachexia). These might provide practical realization of the multimodal muscle-axis impact able to react depending on the condition and the given agent(s) and the symptoms distinctively related to the prime injurious cause symptoms in the wide healing concept, the concept of cytoprotection, in particular. Further, the BPC 157 therapy might be the recovery for the disabled heart functioning, and disabled smooth muscle functioning (various sphincters function recovery). Finally, BPC 157, native and stable in human gastric juice, might be a prototype of anti-ulcer cytoprotective peptide for the muscle therapy with high curing potential (very safe profile (lethal dose not achieved), with suited wide effective range (µg-ng regimens) and ways of application)

Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 as Useful Cytoprotective Peptide Therapy in the Heart Disturbances, Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, Pulmonary Hypertension, Arrhythmias, and Thrombosis Presentation

In heart disturbances, stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 especial therapy effects combine the therapy of myocardial infarction, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension arrhythmias, and thrombosis prevention and reversal. The shared therapy effect occurred as part of its even larger cytoprotection (cardioprotection) therapy effect (direct epithelial cell protection; direct endothelium cell protection) that BPC 157 exerts as a novel cytoprotection mediator, which is native and stable in human gastric juice, as well as easily applicable. Accordingly, there is interaction with many molecular pathways, combining maintained endothelium function and maintained thrombocytes function, which counteracted thrombocytopenia in rats that underwent major vessel occlusion and deep vein thrombosis and counteracted thrombosis in all vascular studies; the coagulation pathways were not affected. These appeared as having modulatory effects on NO-system (NO-release, NOS-inhibition, NO-over-stimulation all affected), controlling vasomotor tone and the activation of the Src-Caveolin-1-eNOS pathway and modulatory effects on the prostaglandins system (BPC 157 counteracted NSAIDs toxicity, counteracted bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and in particular, leaky gut syndrome). As an essential novelty noted in the vascular studies, there was the activation of the collateral pathways. This might be the upgrading of the minor vessel to take over the function of the disabled major vessel, competing with and counteracting the Virchow triad circumstances devastatingly present, making possible the recruitment of collateral blood vessels, compensating vessel occlusion and reestablishing the blood flow or bypassing the occluded or ruptured vessel. As a part of the counteraction of the severe vessel and multiorgan failure syndrome, counteracted were the brain, lung, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal lesions, and in particular, the counteraction of the heart arrhythmias and infarction