3 research outputs found
Differential disgust responding in people with cancer and implications for psychological wellbeing
Objectives: Evidence suggests that disgust responses, known to negatively affect psychological wellbeing, may differ in people with cancer. We performed the first quantitative investigation of three discrete types of disgust trait - disgust propensity, sensitivity, and self-directed disgust - in people diagnosed with a broad range of cancers (versus cancer-free controls), and explored their associations with psychological wellbeing. Design: In a cross-sectional survey design, 107 participants with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses, recruited from cancer charities and support groups, were matched with cancer-free controls by age and gender. Outcome measures: Measures of the three disgust traits were taken alongside measures of anxiety and depression. Results: Disgust sensitivity and physical self-disgust were significantly higher in the cancer than control sample, while disgust propensity and behavioural self-disgust were lower. The disgust traits had a different pattern of associations to psychological wellbeing across the two groups, with disgust sensitivity predicting depressive symptoms to a significantly greater extent in the cancer than control group. Conclusions: People with cancer differ from matched controls in their disgust responses and these responses have significant predictive relationships with aspects of their psychological wellbeing. The results suggest that emotion-based interventions may be useful for improving psychological wellbeing in people with cancer
Effect of partners’ disgust responses on psychological wellbeing in cancer patients
The aim of this study was to explore quantitatively the relationship between disgust responses in cancer patients and their partners, and in turn their relationship to patients’ psychological well-being. We recruited 50 participants with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses and their partners from cancer-related groups (e.g., charities). Patients completed questionnaires to determine levels of disgust propensity, disgust sensitivity, self-disgust, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Disgust propensity and sensitivity were also assessed in their partners. Partners’ disgust sensitivity was significantly positively correlated with cancer patients’ self-disgust, disgust propensity, and depression. Path analyses suggested that patients’ self-disgust plays a role in mediating the effect of partners’ disgust sensitivity on patients’ psychological well-being. This study provides the first quantitative evidence that psychological well-being in cancer patients is contingent on their partners’ sensitivity to disgust, and that patients’ self-disgust plays a mediating role. Focusing therapeutically on disgust responses could well be beneficial to people with cancer
The effect of disgust-related side-effects on symptoms of depression and anxiety in people treated for cancer: a moderated mediation model
As maladaptive disgust responses are linked to mental health problems, and cancer patients
may experience heightened disgust as a result of treatments they receive, we explored the
associations between disgust-related side-effects and symptoms of depression and anxiety in
people treated for cancer. One hundred and thirty two (83 women, Mage = 57.48 years)
participants answered questions about their treatments, side-effects, disgust responding, and
mental health. Experiencing bowel and/or bladder problems, sickness and/or nausea (referred
to here as “core” disgust-related side-effects) was significantly related to greater symptoms of
depression and borderline increased anxiety. Further, these links were explained by a
moderated mediation model, whereby the effects of core disgust side-effects on depression
and anxiety were mediated by (physical and behavioural) self-directed disgust, and disgust
propensity moderated the effect of core disgust side-effects on self-disgust. These findings
stress the importance of emotional responses, like disgust, in psychological adaptation to the
side-effects of cancer treatments