Association of IL-12B rs3212227 and IL-6 rs1800795 polymorphisms with susceptibility to cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Primary studies have shown that the IL-12B rs3212227 and IL-6 rs1800795 polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer. However, conflicting results warrant a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates. Methods: A comprehensive literate search on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, and SciELO was performed to collect all eligible studies up to November 10, 2019. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95 confidence intervals (CI) were used to calculate the risk. This meta-analysis was carried out by utilizing CMA software. Results: A total of eleven case-control studies including four studies on IL-12B rs3212227 and seven studies on IL-6 rs1800795 were selected. Pooled ORs revealed that the IL-6 rs1800795 polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer (C vs. G: OR = 1.294, 95 CI 1.071-1.564, p= 0.007; CC vs. GG: OR = 1.633, 95 CI 1.059-2.520, p= 0.027; CC+CG vs. GG: OR = 1.312, 95 CI 1.048-1.643, p= 0.018; and CC vs. CG+GG: OR = 1.592, 95 CI 1.268-1.999, p�0.001), but not IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism. Stratified analysis by ethnicity revealed that both IL-12B rs3212227 and IL-6 rs1800795 polymorphisms were associated with risk of cervical cancer in Asian women. Conclusions: Our pooled data revealed that the IL-12B rs3212227 and IL-6 rs1800795 polymorphisms may be used to identify individuals at high risk of cervical cancer in Asian women. © 2020, Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention

Association of XRCC3 18067 C>T (Thr241Met) polymorphism with risk of cervical and ovarian cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The 18067 C>T polymorphism of XRCC3 gene has been considered to be implicated in the development of cervical and ovarian cancers, but the results are inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association of XRCC3 18067 C>T polymorphism with risk of cervical and ovarian cancers. All studies on the association of XRCC3 18067 C>T polymorphism with cervical and ovarian cancers risk were retrieved. Finally, a total of 17 studies including 10 studies with 5,637 cases and 10,057 controls on ovarian cancer and 7 studies with 1,112 cases and 1,233 controls on cervical cancer were selected. Overall, pooled results showed that the XRCC3 18067 C>T polymorphism was significantly associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer (TC vs. CC: OR = 0.904, 95 CI = 0.841�0.972, p = 0.006; TT + TC vs. CC: OR = 0.914, 95 CI = 0.853�0.979, p = 0.010) and cervical cancer (TC vs. CC: OR = 1.00, 95 CI = 1.066�1.585, p = 0.009). Further subgroup analysis by ethnicity revealed an increased risk of cervical and ovarian cancer in Asians and Caucasians, respectively. The present meta-analysis inconsistent with the previous meta-analysis suggests that the XRCC3 18067 C>T polymorphism might be implicated in the pathogenesis of cervical and ovarian cancers. © 2019 The Author(s)

Association of Promoter Region Polymorphisms of IL-6 and IL-18 Genes with Risk of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The present meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association of promoter region polymorphisms at IL-6 and IL-18 genes with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) risk. Methods: An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and CNKI databases was performed to identify eligible studies up to May 30, 2019. Results: A total of 31 case-control studies were finally selected. Significant associations with the risk of RPL were detected for the IL-6 -174 G > C, -634 G > C and IL-18 -137 G > C polymorphisms in overall population. Further, subgroup analyses by ethnicity revealed that the IL-6 -174 G > C and -634 G > C polymorphisms were significantly associated with risk of RPL risk in Asians. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the IL-6 -174 G > C, -634 G > C and IL-18 -137 G > C polymorphisms may contribute to the susceptibility of RPL. The IL-18 -607 C > A polymorphism does not appear to influence the development of RPL. © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC