11 research outputs found

    MEDIATE Booklet for general audience

    Get PDF
    MEDIATE: MEDIcation optimisATion in severE mental illness. Medication, particularly anti-psychotics and mood stabilisers, are the main treatment options for people with severe mental illnesses (SMI), such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Whilst helpful in controlling symptoms, these medications can lead to debilitating side effects and the development of additional diagnoses such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. People with SMI often receive complex medication regimens to treat their mental and physical health needs. Optimising these regimens can be challenging and the consequences of failing to do so can be devastating, both in terms of untreated mental illness and medication related side-effects, and can, in turn, increase the risk of non-adherence and relapse. Although collaborative approaches such as shared decision making are thought to positively influence medication optimisation, there is very little published research describing how medication decisions are determined for people living with SMI. MEDIATE was a 16 month long NIHR funded realist review, starting from November 2021 to March 2023, involving extensive stakeholder engagement with ‘experts-by-experience’ to make sense of the complexities and identify potential solutions. This leaflet summarises MEDIATE

    PharMed newsletter Volume 3

    Get PDF

    PharMed Newsletter Volume 4

    Get PDF
    This issue of PharMED is dedicated to introducing some new and old faces, sharing our final Lived Experience Group workshop for MEDIATE and introducing a new project - RESOLVE

    PharMed newsletter Volume 5

    Get PDF

    A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Severe mental illness (SMI) incorporates schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, non-organic psychosis, personality disorder or any other severe and enduring mental health illness. Medication, particularly antipsychotics and mood stabilisers are the main treatment options. Medication optimisation is a hallmark of medication safety, characterised by the use of collaborative, person-centred approaches. There is very little published research describing medication optimisation with people living with SMI. OBJECTIVE: Published literature and two stakeholder groups were employed to answer: What works for whom and in what circumstances to optimise medication use with people living with SMI in the community? METHODS: A five-stage realist review was co-conducted with a lived experience group of individuals living with SMI and a practitioner group caring for individuals with SMI. An initial programme theory was developed. A formal literature search was conducted across eight bibliographic databases, and literature were screened for relevance to programme theory refinement. In total 60 papers contributed to the review. 42 papers were from the original database search with 18 papers identified from additional database searches and citation searches conducted based on stakeholder recommendations. RESULTS: Our programme theory represents a continuum from a service user's initial diagnosis of SMI to therapeutic alliance development with practitioners, followed by mutual exchange of information, shared decision-making and medication optimisation. Accompanying the programme theory are 11 context-mechanism-outcome configurations that propose evidence-informed contextual factors and mechanisms that either facilitate or impede medication optimisation. Two mid-range theories highlighted in this review are supported decision-making and trust formation. CONCLUSIONS: Supported decision-making and trust are foundational to overcoming stigma and establishing 'safety' and comfort between service users and practitioners. Avenues for future research include the influence of stigma and equity across cultural and ethnic groups with individuals with SMI; and use of trained supports, such as peer support workers. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021280980

    PharMed newsletter Volume 2

    Get PDF

    PharMed newsletter Volume 1

    Get PDF

    PharMed newsletter Volume 6

    Get PDF

    A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness

    No full text
    Background: Severe mental illness (SMI) incorporates schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, non-organic psychosis, personality disorder or any other severe and enduring mental health illness. Medication, particularly anti-psychotics and mood stabilisers are the main treatment options. Medication optimisation is a hallmark of medication safety, characterized by the use of collaborative, person-centred approaches. There is very little published research describing medication optimisation with people living with SMI. Objective: Published literature and two stakeholder groups were employed to answer: What works for whom and in what circumstances to optimise medication use with people living with SMI in the community? Methods: A five-stage realist review was co-conducted with a lived experience group of individuals living with SMI and a practitioner group caring for individuals with SMI. An initial programme theory was developed. A formal literature search was conducted across eight bibliographic databases, and literature were screened for relevance to programme theory refinement. In total 60 papers contributed to the review. 42 papers were from the original database search with 18 papers identified from additional database searches and citation searches conducted based on stakeholder recommendations. Results: Our programme theory represents a continuum from a service user’s initial diagnosis of SMI to therapeutic alliance development with practitioners, followed by mutual exchange of information, shared decision-making and medication optimisation. Accompanying the programme theory are 11 context-mechanism-outcome configurations that propose evidence-informed contextual factors and mechanisms that either facilitate or impede medication optimisation. Two mid-range theories highlighted in this review are supported decision-making and trust formation. Conclusions: Supported decision-making and trust are foundational to overcoming stigma and establishing ‘safety’ and comfort between service users and practitioners. Avenues for future research include the influence of stigma and equity across cultural and ethnic groups with individuals with SMI; and use of trained supports, such as peer support workers

    A Realist Evaluation of Social Care Practitioners' Experiences With and Understanding of Applied Healthcare Research

    Get PDF
    Social care practitioners are often under-represented in research activity and output. Evidence-based practice enables social care practitioners to develop/engage the skills to evaluate evidence and be more actively involved in research. REalist Synthesis Of non-pharmacologicaL interVEntions for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (RESOLVE) is a NIHR-funded study where realist synthesis is used to understand and explain how, why, for whom, and in what contexts non-pharmacological interventions help service users, with severe mental illness, to manage antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Social care practitioners are a key part of the team providing care for people living with severe mental illness and therefore supporting antipsychotic-induced weight gain. The current study, RESOLVE 2, uses realist evaluation and RESOLVE as an illustrative example to help understand why and how social care practitioners engage (or not) with research. Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews will be undertaken with a purposive sample of approximately 20 social care practitioners working with people who have severe mental illness, are treated with antipsychotics, and have experienced weight gain. Participants will be recruited from NHS Trusts and recruitment avenues such as social media and personal networks. Topics discussed during interviews will include barriers and facilitators to engagement in research, current, and past engagement as well as recommendations for researchers and other practitioners. Interview recordings will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using realist evaluation which will allow in-depth causal explanations for research engagement. Better understanding of research engagement by social care practitioners will allow for evidence-based practice and better patient outcomes within these settings
    corecore