VENOGRAPHY OF THE LOWER-LIMBS - PITFALLS OF THE DIAGNOSTIC STANDARD

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Phlebography is considered the diagnostic standard for suspected deep venous thrombosis. The authors studied the inter-observer variability of phlebogram interpretation in the setting of a multicenter therapeutic trial of the thrombolytic agent alteplase. METHODS. The interpretation of 31 pairs of venograms (before and after thrombolytic therapy) was studied by comparing the quantitative Marder's scores which were computed by three experts and the qualitative assessment of phlebographic changes induced by thrombolysis by the panel of experts and by the investigators. RESULTS. Although the scores of the three experts correlated fairly well (r = .67-.82; P <.001), they differed significantly from each other (P <.0001). Substantial differences also were found between local (by investigators) qualitative evaluation of the venographic changes induced by the treatment and central evaluation by the panel of experts (coefficient of agreement kappa = 0.19), local assessment being significantly more optimistic (P = .002) than central judgment. CONCLUSION. Significant differences were observed between assessment of changes in venographic scores after thrombolytic treatment both among three expert radiologists, and between the panel of experts and the local investigators of the multicenter trial. This observation points to the need for an a priori definition of well-characterized decision criteria to allow a valid interpretation of the effects of the therapeutic intervention

Effect of Cigarette Smoking on a Marker for Neuroinflammation: A [11C]DAA1106 Positron Emission Tomography Study.

In the brain, microglia continuously scan the surrounding extracellular space in order to respond to damage or infection by becoming activated and participating in neuroinflammation. When activated, microglia increase the expression of translocator protein (TSPO) 18 kDa, thereby making the TSPO expression a marker for neuroinflammation. We used the radiotracer [11C]DAA1106 (a ligand for TSPO) and positron emission tomography (PET) to determine the effect of smoking on availability of this marker for neuroinflammation. Forty-five participants (30 smokers and 15 non-smokers) completed the study and had usable data. Participants underwent a dynamic PET scanning session with bolus injection of [11C]DAA1106 (with smokers in the satiated state) and blood draws during PET scanning to determine TSPO affinity genotype and plasma nicotine levels. Whole-brain standardized uptake values (SUVs) were determined, and analysis of variance was performed, with group (smoker vs non-smoker) and genotype as factors, thereby controlling for genotype. Smokers and non-smokers differed in whole-brain SUVs (P=0.006) owing to smokers having 16.8% lower values than non-smokers. The groups did not differ in injected radiotracer dose or body weight, which were used to calculate SUV. An inverse association was found between whole-brain SUV and reported cigarettes per day (P&lt;0.05), but no significant relationship was found for plasma nicotine. Thus, smokers have less [11C]DAA1106 binding globally than non-smokers, indicating less microglial activation. Study findings are consistent with much prior research demonstrating that smokers have impaired inflammatory functioning compared with non-smokers and that constituents of tobacco smoke other than nicotine affect inflammatory processes

Reconceptualization of translocator protein as a biomarker of neuroinflammation in psychiatry

A great deal of interest in psychiatric research is currently centered upon the pathogenic role of inflammatory processes. Positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled ligands selective for the 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) has become the most widely used technique to assess putative neuroimmune abnormalities in vivo. Originally used to detect discrete neurotoxic damages, TSPO has generally turned into a biomarker of ‘neuroinflammation’ or ‘microglial activation’. Psychiatric research has mostly accepted these denotations of TSPO, even if they may be inadequate and misleading under many pathological conditions. A reliable and neurobiologically meaningful diagnosis of ‘neuroinflammation’ or ‘microglial activation’ is unlikely to be achieved by the sole use of TSPO PET imaging. It is also very likely that the pathological meanings of altered TSPO binding or expression are disease-specific, and therefore, not easily generalizable across different neuropathologies or inflammatory conditions. This difficulty is intricately linked to the varying (and still ill-defined) physiological functions and cellular expression patterns of TSPO in health and disease. While altered TSPO binding or expression may indeed mirror ongoing neuroinflammatory processes in some cases, it may reflect other pathophysiological processes such as abnormalities in cell metabolism, energy production and oxidative stress in others. Hence, the increasing popularity of TSPO PET imaging has paradoxically introduced substantial uncertainty regarding the nature and meaning of neuroinflammatory processes and microglial activation in psychiatry, and likely in other neuropathological conditions as well. The ambiguity of conceiving TSPO simply as a biomarker of ‘neuroinflammation’ or ‘microglial activation’ calls for alternative interpretations and complimentary approaches. Without the latter, the ongoing scientific efforts and excitement surrounding the role of the neuroimmune system in psychiatry may not turn into therapeutic hope for affected individuals