32 research outputs found

    Whole-Genome Sequencing of Pigeonpea: Requirement, Background History, Current Status and Future Prospects for Crop Improvement

    Get PDF
    Despite of being a very important crop, pigeonpea did not have genomic resources until 2005. Pigeonpea Genomics Initiative (PGI) supported by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) under Indo-US Agriculture Knowledge Initiative was the first major initiative that delivered first set of molecular markers in large numbers, first set of mapping populations, first set of transcriptome assemblies, etc. Subsequently, two consortia—1) International Initiative for Pigeonpea Genomics (IIPG), led by International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) and 2) Led by National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology (NRCPB)—delivered two draft genome assemblies for Asha (ICPL 87119) variety. In summary, all these genomic resources transformed pigeonpea from an ‘orphan crop’ to ‘genomics resources-rich crop’. After publication of draft genome sequences, a detailed plan was developed to utilize draft genome information for pigeonpea improvement. This plan in the form of a proposal was approved by Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India and United States Agency for International Development (USAID)—India. In addition to this major project, two additional projects were funded by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. All these efforts have established high-density genotyping platforms such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and ​‘Axiom® CajanusSNP Array’, produced the first generation HapMap, generated whole-genome re-sequencing data of >400 pigeonpea lines, evaluated several mapping populations for desired traits, established marker–trait association for several traits of interest to breeders and also identified best-performing lines. Additionally, multi-parent advance generation inter-cross (MAGIC) and nested association mapping (NAM) populations are being developed. With the availability of above-mentioned information, next few years will be witnessing application of genomics-assisted breeding for pigeonpea improvement. It is anticipated that improved pigeonpea lines developed through genomics interventions will reach to farmers’ fields and elevate the game towards pulse sufficiency for poor farmers in arid and semi-arid regions of the world in near future

    Interventional suite and equipment management: cradle to grave

    Get PDF
    The acquisition process for interventional equipment and the care that this equipment receives constitute a comprehensive quality improvement program. This program strives to (a) achieve the production of good image quality that meets clinical needs, (b) reduce radiation doses to the patient and personnel to their lowest possible levels, and (c) provide overall good patient care at reduced cost. Interventional imaging equipment is only as effective and efficient as its supporting facility. The acquisition process of interventional equipment and the development of its environment demand a clinical project leader who can effectively coordinate the efforts of the many professionals who must communicate and work effectively on this type of project. The clinical project leader needs to understand (a) clinical needs of the end users, (b) how to justify the cost of the project, (c) the technical needs of the imaging and all associated equipment, (d) building and construction limitations, (e) how to effectively read construction drawings, and (f) how to negotiate and contract the imaging equipment from the appropriate vendor. After the initial commissioning of the equipment, it must not be forgotten. The capabilities designed into the imaging device can be properly utilized only by well-trained operators and staff who were initially properly trained and receive ongoing training concerning the latest clinical techniques throughout the equipment’s lifetime. A comprehensive, ongoing maintenance and repair program is paramount to reducing costly downtime of the imaging device. A planned periodic maintenance program can identify and eliminate problems with the imaging device before these problems negatively impact patient care

    Dicationic Alkylammonium Bromide Gemini Surfactants. Membrane Perturbation and Skin Irritation

    Get PDF
    Dicationic alkylammonium bromide gemini surfactants represent a class of amphiphiles potentially effective as skin permeation enhancers. However, only a limited number of studies has been dedicated to the evaluation of the respective cytotoxicity, and none directed to skin irritation endpoints. Supported on a cell viability study, the cytotoxicity of gemini surfactants of variable tail and spacer length was assessed. For this purpose, keratinocyte cells from human skin (NCTC 2544 cell line), frequently used as a model for skin irritation, were employed. The impact of the different gemini surfactants on the permeability and morphology of model vesicles was additionally investigated by measuring the leakage of calcein fluorescent dye and analyzing the NMR spectra of 31P, respectively. Detail on the interaction of gemini molecules with model membranes was also provided by a systematic differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. An irreversible impact on the viability of the NCTC 2544 cell line was observed for gemini concentrations higher than 25 mM, while no cytotoxicity was found for any of the surfactants in a concentration range up to 10 mM. A higher cytotoxicity was also found for gemini surfactants presenting longer spacer and shorter tails. The same trend was obtained in the calorimetric and permeability studies, with the gemini of longest spacer promoting the highest degree of membrane destabilization. Additional structural and dynamical characterization of the various systems, obtained by 31P NMR and MD, provide some insight on the relationship between the architecture of gemini surfactants and the respective perturbation mechanism

    Heritable Epigenetic Variation among Maize Inbreds

    Get PDF
    Epigenetic variation describes heritable differences that are not attributable to changes in DNA sequence. There is the potential for pure epigenetic variation that occurs in the absence of any genetic change or for more complex situations that involve both genetic and epigenetic differences. Methylation of cytosine residues provides one mechanism for the inheritance of epigenetic information. A genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation in two different genotypes of Zea mays (ssp. mays), an organism with a complex genome of interspersed genes and repetitive elements, allowed the identification and characterization of examples of natural epigenetic variation. The distribution of DNA methylation was profiled using immunoprecipitation of methylated DNA followed by hybridization to a high-density tiling microarray. The comparison of the DNA methylation levels in the two genotypes, B73 and Mo17, allowed for the identification of approximately 700 differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Several of these DMRs occur in genomic regions that are apparently identical by descent in B73 and Mo17 suggesting that they may be examples of pure epigenetic variation. The methylation levels of the DMRs were further studied in a panel of near-isogenic lines to evaluate the stable inheritance of the methylation levels and to assess the contribution of cis- and trans- acting information to natural epigenetic variation. The majority of DMRs that occur in genomic regions without genetic variation are controlled by cis-acting differences and exhibit relatively stable inheritance. This study provides evidence for naturally occurring epigenetic variation in maize, including examples of pure epigenetic variation that is not conditioned by genetic differences. The epigenetic differences are variable within maize populations and exhibit relatively stable trans-generational inheritance. The detected examples of epigenetic variation, including some without tightly linked genetic variation, may contribute to complex trait variation
    corecore