2,723 research outputs found
Reversibility of tacrolimus-induced posttransplant diabetes: an illustrative case and review of the literature
What About Librarianship in LIS Curricula?
Over the past 20 years, Library and Information Science (LIS) programs have greatly
diversified what they teach beyond librarianship to include many related, relevant topics, like
information needs, human computer interaction, information policy, or knowledge management.
As they have done so, many LIS programs have re-positioned themselves within universities as
I-Schools with explicit teaching and research agendas addressing information broadlyâand even
dropping the âLâ word from their names. However, this intellectual expansion raises important
questions: How important is librarianship to the curricula of a School or Department of LIS or to
an I School? How important is librarianship to graduates of these I-Schools or LIS Schools and
Departments? To what degree is librarianship specific to the curricula of these Departments and
Schools, providing them an educational niche distinct from those occupied by other information
educators, such as Departments of Computer Science or Communication?
Possible answers to these questions are: First, librarianship provides something essential
to people by addressing perennial limits people have as to intellectual content, e.g. by addressing
peopleâs inability to consume all existing content by putting it into smaller, understandable
content collections. Second, at least historically, most graduates in LIS or I-Schools have worked
in libraries because they provide librarianship, a service essential to people, making librarianship
very important to the graduatesâ careers. Third, librarianship either is or can be a niche very
specific or even unique to LIS Departments or I-Schools, providing them a great curricular
opportunity. This SIG Session will address these questions and their proposed answers, spurring
conversation and consideration of these important issues
Tacrolimus rescue therapy for renal allograft rejection - Five-year experience
Over the 5 year period from 7/14/1989 until 5/24/1994, we have attempted graft salvage with tacrolimus conversion in a total of 169 patients (median age 33 years, range 2-75 years) with ongoing rejection on baseline CsA immunosuppression after failure of high dose corticosteroids and/or antilymphocyte preparations to reverse rejection. The indications for conversion to tacrolimus were ongoing, biopsy confirmed rejection in all patients. The median interval to tacrolimus conversion was 2 months (range 2 days to 55 months; mean 4.3±2.6 months) after transplantation. All patients had failed high dose corticosteroid therapy and 144 (85%) of the 169 patients had received at least one course of an antilymphocyte preparation plus high dose corticosteroid therapy prior to conversion. Twenty-eight patients (17%) were dialysis-dependent at the time of conversion owing to the severity of rejection. With a mean follow-up of 30.0±2.4 months (median 36.5 months, range 12-62 months), 125 of 169 patients (74%) have been successfully rescued and still have functioning grafts with a mean serum creatinine (SCR) of 2.3±1.1 mg/dl. Of the 144 patients previously treated with antilymphocyte preparations, 117 (81%) were salvaged. Of the 28 patients on dialysis at the time of conversion to tacrolimus, 13 (46%) continue to have functioning grafts (mean SCR 2.15±0.37 mg/dl) at a mean follow-up of 37.3±16.7 months. In the 125 patients salvaged, prednisone doses have been lowered from 28.0±9.0 mg/d (median 32, range 4-60 mg/d) preconversion to 8.5±4.1 mg/d (median 12 mg/d, range 2.5-20 mg/d) postconversion. Twenty-eight patients (22.4%) are currently receiving no steroids. This 5 year experience demonstrates that tacrolimus has sustained efficacy as a rescue agent for ongoing renal allograft rejection. Based on these data, we recommend that tacrolimus be used as an alternative to the conventional drugs used for antirejection therapy in renal transplantation
Tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation
Tacrolimus was used as the primary immunosuppressive agent in 69 pediatric renal transplantations between December 17, 1989, and June 30, 1995. Children undergoing concomitant or prior liver and/or intestinal transplantation were excluded from analysis. The mean recipient age was 10.3±5.0 years (range, 0.7-17.5 years). Seventeen (24.6%) children were undergoing retransplantation, and six (8.7%) had a panel reactive antibody level of 40% or higher. Thirty-nine (57%) cases were with cadaveric kidneys, and 30 (43%) were with living donors. The mean donor age was 28.0±14.7 years (range, 1.0-50.0 years), and the mean cold ischemia time for the cadaveric kidneys was 27.0±9.4 hr. The antigen match was 2.7±1.2, and the mismatch was 3.1±1.2. All patients received tacrolimus and steroids, without antibody induction, and 26% received azathioprine as well. The mean follow-up was 32±20 months. One- and 4-year actuarial patient survival rates were 100% and 95%. One- and 4-year actuarial graft survival rates were 99% and 85%. The mean serum creatinine level was 1.2±0.8 mg/dl, and the calculated creatinine clearance was 82±26 ml/min/1.73 m2. The mean tacrolimus dose was 0.22±0.14 mg/kg/day, and the level was 9.5±4.8 ng/ml. The mean prednisone dose was 2.1±4.9 mg/day (0.07±0.17 mg/kg/day), and 73% of successfully transplanted children were off prednisone. Seventy-nine percent were not taking any antihypertensive medications. The mean serum cholesterol level was 158±54 mg/dl. The incidence of delayed graft function was 4.3%. The incidence of rejection was 49%, and the incidence of steroid-resistant rejection was 6%. The incidence of rejection decreased to 27% in the most recent 26 cases (January 1994 through June 1995). The incidence of new-onset diabetes was 10.1%; six of the seven affected children were able to be weaned off insulin. The incidence of cytomegalovirus disease was 13%, and that of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was 10%; the incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in the last 40 transplants was 5% (two cases). All of the children who developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder are alive and have functioning allografts. Based on this data, we believe that tacrolimus is a superior immunosuppressive agent in pediatric renal transplant patients, with excellent short- and medium-term patient and graft survival, an ability to withdraw steroids in the majority of patients, and, with more experience, a decreasing rate of rejection and vital complications
Augmentation of chimerism with perioperative donor bone marrow infusion in organ transplant recipients: A 44 month follow-up
Renal transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh: the impact of FK506.
1. In an unselected adult renal transplant population, FK506 as the primary immunosuppressive agent yielded one- and 2-year actuarial patient survival rates of 95% and 93% and one- and 2-year actuarial graft survival rates of 89% and 83%, respectively. Forty-nine percent of successfully transplanted patients were weaned off steroids. 2. In pediatric renal transplant patients, FK506 has been associated with 100% one- and 3-year actuarial patient survival rates and 98% and 85% one- and 3-year actuarial graft survival rates, respectively. Sixty-two percent of successfully transplanted patients were taken off prednisone, with dramatic improvements in height. 3. FK506 has been used successfully in rescuing 70-74% of adult or pediatric renal transplant patients with an acute rejection that failed conventional therapy. 4. Kidney/bone marrow transplantation under FK506 therapy has been successfully performed without graft-versus-host disease and with routine augmentation of chimerism. 5. The side effects of FK506 included nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and diabetogenicity; they were comparable to those seen with CsA. 6. FK506 is an important new addition to the immunosuppressive armamentarium in renal transplant patients
A prospective, randomized trial to compare tacrolimus and prednisone with and without mycophenolate mofetil in patients undergoing renal transplantation: first report.
PURPOSE: Between September 20, 1995 and September 20, 1996, 120 patients were entered into a prospective, randomized trial comparing tacrolimus and prednisone with (61) and without (59) 2 gm. mycophenolate mofetil daily to determine whether mycophenolate mofetil was associated with a lower incidence of rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mean recipient age plus or minus standard deviation was 50.8+/-14.1 years (range 18.8 to 84.1). Mean donor age was 34.3+/-21.7 years (range 0.01 to 76). Of the donors 18 (15%) were older than 60 years. Mean cold ischemia time was 30.9+/-8.4 hours (range 14.2 to 49). Median followup was 8.6+/-0.5 months. RESULTS: The 6-month actuarial patient survival was 95%, 92% in the double therapy group and 98% in the triple therapy group (not significant). The 6-month actuarial graft survival was 88%, 84% in the double therapy group and 92% in the triple therapy group (not significant). The overall incidence of rejection and steroid resistant rejection was 34.2 and 4.2%, respectively. There was a strong trend toward less rejection in the mycophenolate mofetil group than in the double therapy group (26.2 versus 42.4%). Crossover was common, and was 42.6% from triple to double therapy and 18.6% from double to triple therapy. The reasons for discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil were gastrointestinal toxicity, primarily diarrhea, or less commonly hematological toxicity, primarily neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was ameliorated by separating the doses of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil by 2 to 4 hours, and reducing the dose to 1 gm. daily. CONCLUSIONS: Mycophenolate mofetil appears to be a useful third agent with tacrolimus in patients undergoing renal transplantation, and is associated with a reduction in the rate of rejection and a low incidence of steroid resistant rejection. There is a high incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity associated with the 2 gm. daily dose but this complication is relatively straightforward to manage
- âŠ