Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on health-Related quality of life in esophageal or junctional cancer: Results from the randomized CROSS trial

Purpose To compare pre-agreed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains in patients with esophageal or junctional cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery or surgery alone. Secondary aims were to examine the effect of nCRT on HRQOL before surgery and the effect of surgery on HRQOL. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to nCRT (carboplatin plus paclitaxel with concurrent 41.4-Gy radiotherapy) followed by surgery or surgery alone. HRQOL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and –Oesophageal Cancer Module (QLQ-OES24) questionnaires pretreatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The nCRT group also received preoperative questionnaires. Physical functioning (PF; QLQ-C30) and eating problems (EA; QLQ-OES24) were chosen as predefined primary end points. Predefined secondary end points were global QOL (GQOL; QLQ-C30), fatigue (FA; QLQ-C30), and emotional problems (EM; QLQ-OES24). Results A total of 363 patients were analyzed. No statistically significant differences in postoperative HRQOL were found between treatment groups. In the nCRT group, PF, EA, GQOL, FA, and EM scores deteriorated 1 week after nCRT (Cohen’s d: 20.93, P, .001; 0.47, P, .001; 20.84, P, .001; 1.45, P, .001; and 0.32, P = .001, respectively). In both treatment groups, all end points declined 3 months postoperatively compared with baseline (Cohen’s d: 21.00, 0.33, 20.47, 20.34, and 0.33, respectively; all P, .001), followed by a continuous gradual improvement. EA, GQOL, and EM were restored to baseline levels during follow-up, whereas PF and FA remained impaired 1 year postoperatively (Cohen’s d: 0.52 and 20.53, respectively; both P, .001). Conclusion Although HRQOL declined during nCRT, no effect of nCRT was apparent on postoperative HRQOL compared with surgery alone. In addition to the improvement in survival, these findings support the view that nCRT according to the Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study–regimen can be regarded as a standard of care

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Esophageal or Junctional Cancer: Results From the Randomized CROSS Trial

PurposeTo compare pre-agreed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains in patients with esophageal or junctional cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery or surgery alone. Secondary aims were to examine the effect of nCRT on HRQOL before surgery and the effect of surgery on HRQOL.Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to nCRT (carboplatin plus paclitaxel with concurrent 41.4-Gy radiotherapy) followed by surgery or surgery alone. HRQOL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and –Oesophageal Cancer Module (QLQ-OES24) questionnaires pretreatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The nCRT group also received preoperative questionnaires. Physical functioning (PF; QLQ-C30) and eating problems (EA; QLQ-OES24) were chosen as predefined primary end points. Predefined secondary end points were global QOL (GQOL; QLQ-C30), fatigue (FA; QLQ-C30), and emotional problems (EM; QLQ-OES24).ResultsA total of 363 patients were analyzed. No statistically significant differences in postoperative HRQOL were found between treatment groups. In the nCRT group, PF, EA, GQOL, FA, and EM scores deteriorated 1 week after nCRT (Cohen’s d: −0.93, P P P P P = .001, respectively). In both treatment groups, all end points declined 3 months postoperatively compared with baseline (Cohen’s d: −1.00, 0.33, −0.47, −0.34, and 0.33, respectively; all P P ConclusionAlthough HRQOL declined during nCRT, no effect of nCRT was apparent on postoperative HRQOL compared with surgery alone. In addition to the improvement in survival, these findings support the view that nCRT according to the Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study–regimen can be regarded as a standard of care.FSW – Publicaties zonder aanstelling Universiteit Leide

Preoperative assessment of tumor location and station-specific lymph node status in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction

Contains fulltext : 125789.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)In esophageal cancer patients preoperative staging will determine the type of surgical procedure and use of neoadjuvant therapy. Tumor location and lymph node status play a pivotal role in this tailored strategy. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of preoperative assessment of tumor location according to the Siewert classification and lymph node status per station with endoscopy/endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT).In 50 esophagectomy patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), tumor location according to Siewert and N-stage per nodal station as determined preoperatively by endoscopy/EUS and CT were compared with the histopathologic findings in the resection specimen.Overall accuracy in predicting tumor location according to the Siewert classification was 70 \% for endoscopy/EUS and 72 \% for CT. Preoperative data could not be compared with the pathologic assessment in 11 patients (22 \%), as large tumors obscured the landmark of the gastric folds. The overall accuracy for predicting the N-stage in 250 lymph node stations was 66 \% for EUS and 68 \% for CT. The accuracy was good for those stations located high in the thorax, but poor for celiac trunk nodes.Given the frequent discrepancy between the endoscopic and pathologic location of the GEJ and the common problem of advanced tumors obscuring the landmarks used in the assessment of the Siewert classification, its usefulness is limited. The overall accuracy for EUS and CT in predicting the N-stage per station was moderate

Inter- and intraobserver variation in the histopathological evaluation of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Aims According to the classification established by the Japanese Society for Oesophageal Disease, early oesophageal cancer can be subdivided into six successive layers of the mucosa or submucosa, which influences the treatment strategy and prognosis of the individual patient. However, the reproducibility of this classification in terms of inter-and intraobserver variability is unclear. Methods Histological slides from 105 surgical resection specimens of patients who had undergone oesophagectomy for early oesophageal adenocarcinoma were reviewed independently by three gastrointestinal pathologists, and were classified according to the Japanese criteria (m1/m2/m3/sm1/sm2/sm3 tumours). Inter-and intraobserver variation was determined by k-statistics. Results The interobserver reproducibility was good between pathologist 1 and 2 (kappa=0.61, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.67), and moderate between pathologist 1 and 3 (kappa-0.51, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.57) and between pathologist 2 and 3 (kappa=0.50, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.61). The intraobserver agreement as assessed by the expert pathologist was good (kappa=0.76), with a 95% CI that was interpreted as good to very good (0.67 to 0.85). Most agreement was achieved at the lower (m1) and upper site (sm2, sm3) of the spectrum, whereas the m2 tumours reflected the most discrepant stage. The majority of the observed discrepancy included the variation in one substage only. Conclusions The reproducibility of the Japanese classification is good in terms of inter- and intraobserver variability when grading early oesophageal adenocarcinoma on surgical resection specimens. The present data confirm that dedicated gastrointestinal pathologists with broad experience are preferred when grading the resection specimens of patients with early oesophageal adenocarcinom

Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced oesophageal cancer

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Patients with locoregionally advanced oesophageal tumours or disputable distant metastases are referred for induction chemotherapy with the aim to downstage the tumour before an oesophagectomy is considered. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent induction chemotherapy between January 2005 and December 2012 were identified from an institutional database. Treatment plan was discussed in the multidisciplinary team. Response to chemotherapy was assessed by CT. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: In total 124 patients received induction chemotherapy mainly for locoregionally advanced disease (n = 80). Surgery was withheld in 35 patients because of progressive disease (n = 16) and persistent unresectability (n = 19). The median overall survival of this group was 13 months (IQR: 8-19). The remaining 89 patients underwent surgery of which 13 still had unresectable tumour or distant metastases. Of the 76 patients that underwent an oesophagectomy, 50 patients had tumour free resection margins (66%) with an estimated 5-year survival of 37%. A positive resection margin (HR 4.148, 95% CI 2.298-7.488, p < 0.0001) was associated with a worse survival in univariable analysis, but only pathological lymph node status with increasing hazard ratio's (6.283-10.283, p = 0.001) remained significant after multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy downstages the tumour and facilitates a radical oesophagectomy in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. Pathological lymph node status is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival

The long-term impact of autoimmune pancreatitis on pancreatic function, quality of life, and life expectancy

Objective: To evaluate the long-termoutcome of autoimmune pancreatitis. Methods: Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Information was collected regarding disease characteristics, treatment outcome, diagnosedmalignancies, andmortality. In addition, pancreatic function and quality of life were assessed prospectively. Results: 107 patients were included (87% men, 90% with type 1), with a median follow-up of 74 (interquartile range, 49-108) months. One third was operated for suspected pancreatic cancer (32%). Most patients were (successfully) treated with steroids (83%), but relapses were common (52%), for which no risk factors could be identified. Pancreatic carcinoma was not observed. Prospective data were obtained from 64%, as 17% had died, 7% were lost to follow-up, and 13% refused to participate. After a median of 75 (interquartile range, 50-106) months, 46% still used active treatment. Exocrine and endocrine insufficiencieswere highly prevalent (82%and 57%, respectively). Quality of life and survival were not impaired, as compared with a reference population. Conclusions: Despite an excellent initial treatment response, relapses are common, even in type 2, and almost half of the patients require maintenance therapy. Pancreatic insufficiency is highly prevalent, which calls for active screening. Pancreatic cancer was not observed, and quality of life and survival are not impaired

Comparable efficacy of low- versus high-dose induction corticosteroid treatment in autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare efficacy of high versus low doses of prednisone for induction of remission in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicenter study including patients diagnosed with AIP between May 1992 and August 2011. Clinical, laboratory and imaging findings were assessed before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after starting treatment. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (57 males; median age, 63 years) were treated with an initial low dose (10-20 mg/d, n = 14), a medium dose (30 mg/d, n = 15), or a high dose (40-60 mg/d, n = 36) of prednisone. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups including age, presenting symptoms and laboratory results. During a follow-up period of 6 months, in nearly all patients, symptoms (jaundice, weight loss) resolved completely. After 6 months, treatment response with respect to symptomatic, radiological, and laboratory improvement was comparable for the different dosage groups. CONCLUSIONS: Response to therapy was comparable for AIP patients treated with doses of prednisone in the range of 10 to 60 mg/d. A prospective trial should be conducted to confirm efficacy of lower-dose prednisone treatment