27 research outputs found
Understanding the nephrotic syndrome: What's new in a decade?
PubMed ID: 7617085[No abstract available
Pathophysiology of edema formation in children with nephrotic syndrome not due to minimal change disease.
Department of Pediatric Nephrology in Wilhelmina's Children Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands. It has been shown that children with nephrotic syndrome due to minimal change disease (MCD) can present with avid salt retention and stimulated vasoactive hormones, as well as with stable edema. The present study examines these conditions in children with nephrotic syndrome not due to MCD (non-MCD). In six children with hypovolemic symptoms (congenital nephrotic syndrome in four), strong sodium retention (fractional sodium excretion, FE(Na), 0.2 +/- 0.2%) was found. Lithium clearance (FE(Li)) and maximal water excretion (Vmax) were suppressed, suggesting avid sodium reabsorption throughout the nephron. Aldosterone, renin, and norepinephrine were elevated. Sixteen other children with non-MCD had stable edema. FE(Na) was 1.8 +/- 1.1%, whereas FE(Li), Vmax, and hormones were normal, and not different from data in 35 nonproteinuric children. In children with MCD, 12 presented with hypovolemic symptoms and strong sodium retention (FE(Na) 0.3 +/- 0.3%), whereas 15 were stable (FE(Na) 1.1 +/- 0.7%). Regarding tubular sodium handling and hormones, the same distinction could be made as for the children with non-MCD. However, hypoproteinemia differed. In the children with non-MCD lesions, plasma colloid osmotic pressure was significantly lower in the hypovolemic types (4.2 +/- 0.4 mmHg) than in those with stable edema (13.0 +/- 3.8 mmHg; P < 0.05); in MCD, no such difference existed (respectively, 8.1 +/- 3.0 and 9.9 +/- 2.2 mmHg). In summary, children with nephrotic syndrome may present with pathophysiologic pictures of decreased effective circulating volume or of stable edema, regardless of whether they have non-MCD or MCD. The pathogenesis of the hypovolemic picture seems to be different, since it is associated with extreme hypoproteinemia only in the children with non-MCD
Losartan versus enalapril on cerebral edema and proteinuria in stroke-prone hypertensive rats
Stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP), subjected to high NaCl, show severe hypertension, organ damage, and early death. Preventive treatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists is known to be effective. Previously, we found that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition could reduce cerebral edema when treatment was started after manifestation of either proteinuria or cerebral edema. In this study AT1 receptor blockade was started at the same time points to evaluate whether this had an effect superior to ACE inhibition. SHRSP drank 1% NaCl. Group 1 served as controls. Group 2 and 3 rats were started on losartan and enalapril after proteinuria exceeded 40 mg/day. Group 4 and 5 rats were started on losartan and enalapril after the first observation of cerebral edema with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. In controls, median survival was 54 days (range, 35 to 80 days) after the start of salt loading. With early-onset losartan and enalapril, survival increased to 305 days (range, 184 to 422 days) and 320 days (range, 134 to 368 days) (both P <.01 v group 1). Cerebral edema formation was prevented in all but two rats, one from each treatment modality. Development of proteinuria was markedly reduced. With late-onset treatment with losartan and enalapril, survival was 290 days (range, 120 to 367 days) and 264 days (range, 154 to 319 days) (both P <.01). Both losartan and enalapril decreased cerebral edema to baseline levels. Ultimately cerebral edema reoccurred, despite continued treatment, in 75% of the rats. Systolic blood pressure did not decrease after losartan treatment, but, similarly to early-onset treatment, decreased transiently after enalapril treatment. Cerebral edema and proteinuria were prevented and reduced in SHRSP treated with either an AT1 receptor antagonist or an ACE inhibitor. Survival was markedly and similarly prolonged by both treatments, whether initiated directly before or after development of cerebral edema. In rats where treatment was initiated after manifestation of cerebral edema, both cerebral edema and proteinuria reappeared despite continued treatment. Apparently, when hypertension is sustained, reappearance of target organ damage may not be entirely dependent on angiotensin
Growth hormone therapy influences endothelial function in children with renal failure.
Contains fulltext :
58323.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Endothelial dysfunction, an early step in atherogenesis, is prevalent in children with renal insufficiency. Endothelial dysfunction in growth hormone deficiency is reversed by growth hormone (rhGH) therapy. Renal failure induces growth hormone resistance at the receptor and post-receptor level, which can be overcome by rhGH therapy. This study investigates the influence of rhGH therapy in children with renal failure on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, a marker of endothelial function. We studied 8 patients, who were on rhGH for at least 6 months, and 8 healthy children for comparison. FMD of the brachial artery was measured non-invasively as the percentage increase in diameter during post-ischemic hyperemia. Patients were studied at baseline, after 4 weeks interruption of rhGH therapy, and 4 weeks after resumption of therapy. FMD was significantly lower in patients (4.7%) than healthy controls (13.8%) ( P=0.01). During the administration of rhGH, FMD was significantly higher (3.9%) than during interruption of the treatment (1.4%) ( P=0.04). Our data support the theory that a disturbance in the GH-IGF axis contributes to the endothelial dysfunction of renal failure. Treatment with rhGH not only improves growth but may also favorably influence the risk for atherogenesis
Losartan versus enalapril on cerebral edema and proteinuria in stroke-prone hypertensive rats
Stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP), subjected to high NaCl, show severe hypertension, organ damage, and early death. Preventive treatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists is known to be effective. Previously, we found that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition could reduce cerebral edema when treatment was started after manifestation of either proteinuria or cerebral edema. In this study AT1 receptor blockade was started at the same time points to evaluate whether this had an effect superior to ACE inhibition. SHRSP drank 1% NaCl. Group 1 served as controls. Group 2 and 3 rats were started on losartan and enalapril after proteinuria exceeded 40 mg/day. Group 4 and 5 rats were started on losartan and enalapril after the first observation of cerebral edema with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. In controls, median survival was 54 days (range, 35 to 80 days) after the start of salt loading. With early-onset losartan and enalapril, survival increased to 305 days (range, 184 to 422 days) and 320 days (range, 134 to 368 days) (both P <.01 v group 1). Cerebral edema formation was prevented in all but two rats, one from each treatment modality. Development of proteinuria was markedly reduced. With late-onset treatment with losartan and enalapril, survival was 290 days (range, 120 to 367 days) and 264 days (range, 154 to 319 days) (both P <.01). Both losartan and enalapril decreased cerebral edema to baseline levels. Ultimately cerebral edema reoccurred, despite continued treatment, in 75% of the rats. Systolic blood pressure did not decrease after losartan treatment, but, similarly to early-onset treatment, decreased transiently after enalapril treatment. Cerebral edema and proteinuria were prevented and reduced in SHRSP treated with either an AT1 receptor antagonist or an ACE inhibitor. Survival was markedly and similarly prolonged by both treatments, whether initiated directly before or after development of cerebral edema. In rats where treatment was initiated after manifestation of cerebral edema, both cerebral edema and proteinuria reappeared despite continued treatment. Apparently, when hypertension is sustained, reappearance of target organ damage may not be entirely dependent on angiotensin
Losartan versus enalapril on cerebral edema and proteinuria in stroke-prone hypertensive rats
Stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP), subjected to high NaCl, show severe hypertension, organ damage, and early death. Preventive treatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists is known to be effective. Previously, we found that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition could reduce cerebral edema when treatment was started after manifestation of either proteinuria or cerebral edema. In this study AT1 receptor blockade was started at the same time points to evaluate whether this had an effect superior to ACE inhibition. SHRSP drank 1% NaCl. Group 1 served as controls. Group 2 and 3 rats were started on losartan and enalapril after proteinuria exceeded 40 mg/day. Group 4 and 5 rats were started on losartan and enalapril after the first observation of cerebral edema with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. In controls, median survival was 54 days (range, 35 to 80 days) after the start of salt loading. With early-onset losartan and enalapril, survival increased to 305 days (range, 184 to 422 days) and 320 days (range, 134 to 368 days) (both P <.01 v group 1). Cerebral edema formation was prevented in all but two rats, one from each treatment modality. Development of proteinuria was markedly reduced. With late-onset treatment with losartan and enalapril, survival was 290 days (range, 120 to 367 days) and 264 days (range, 154 to 319 days) (both P <.01). Both losartan and enalapril decreased cerebral edema to baseline levels. Ultimately cerebral edema reoccurred, despite continued treatment, in 75% of the rats. Systolic blood pressure did not decrease after losartan treatment, but, similarly to early-onset treatment, decreased transiently after enalapril treatment. Cerebral edema and proteinuria were prevented and reduced in SHRSP treated with either an AT1 receptor antagonist or an ACE inhibitor. Survival was markedly and similarly prolonged by both treatments, whether initiated directly before or after development of cerebral edema. In rats where treatment was initiated after manifestation of cerebral edema, both cerebral edema and proteinuria reappeared despite continued treatment. Apparently, when hypertension is sustained, reappearance of target organ damage may not be entirely dependent on angiotensin
Sympathetic hyperactivity in chronic kidney disease: pathogenesis, clinical relevance, and treatment.
Item does not contain fulltextCardiovascular morbidity and mortality importantly influence live expectancy of patients with chronic renal disease (CKD). Traditional risk factors are usually present, but several other factors have recently been identified. There is now evidence that CKD is often characterized by an activated sympathetic nervous system. This may contribute to the pathogenesis of renal hypertension, but it may also adversely affect prognosis independently of its effect on blood pressure. The purpose of this review is to summarize available knowledge on the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of renal hypertension, its clinical relevance, and the consequences of this knowledge for the choice of treatment
Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the rat kidney
This study was designed to assess whether contrast-enhanced dynamic 1H magnetic resonance imaging (DMRI) can be used to detect the effects of the loop diuretic furosemide and the vasoactive peptide angiotensin II on tubular water reabsorption in the rat kidney. A bolus of gadolinium- DTPA-dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) (0.025 or 0.1 mmol/kg) was used as a contrast agent. The signal intensity in the magnetic resonance images relative to the precontrast signal intensity (RSI) was assessed as a function of time in the cortex and medulla. In the cortex, no differences were observed between high and low bolus injection, and between different treatment groups and controls. In the medulla, RSI patterns were different between high and low bolus, with the high bolus showing lower RSI values, because of T2 shortening at high Gd-DTPA concentrations. No difference was observed between controls and angiotensin II-infused animals. This is in line with the finding that angiotensin II did not alter medullary water reabsorption, as evidenced by unchanged urine flow and osmolality compared with controls. Medullary RSI patterns during furosemide infusion differed markedly from controls, in a manner suggesting that a lower concentration of Gd- DTPA was present compared with controls. This agrees with the well- known inhibiting effect of furosemide on medullary water reabsorption. It was concluded that, with the method used, small concentration differences of Gd-DTPA in the cortex resulting from small changes of plus or minus 20% in tubular water reabsorption, previously found to be present by direct micropuncture measurements, cannot be detected in rats. However, large changes in renal concentrating ability do result in different RSI patterns in the medulla