Problem-solving breast MRI: useful or a source of new problems?

PURPOSE:We aimed to evaluate the findings and results from breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for problem-solving purposes due to inconclusive conventional imaging findings.METHODS:Imaging findings, biopsy and follow-up results were retrospectively evaluated for breast MRI performed for problem-solving purposes at our department between January 2011 and December 2016 for cases whose mammography, tomosynthesis, or ultrasonography findings were inconclusive. RESULTS:Lesions were identified in 414 of 986 problem-solving MRI examinations, and 13.3% of these lesions were diagnosed as malignant. A total of 124 lesions were additionally found by MRI, and 9.7% of these lesions were diagnosed as malignant. MRI produced false-negative results in four cases. In cases whose conventional imaging methods yielded indefinite results, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of MRI were found to be 96.3%, 83%, 99.3%, and 46.5%, respectively. For the additional lesions identified, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of MRI were found to be 91.7%, 69%, 98.7%, and 24%, respectively.CONCLUSION:Breast MRI is a reliable problem-solving method for excluding malignancy that cannot be confirmed by conventional imaging. In such cases, additional findings from MRI may help identify new cancers that cannot be detected with conventional methods. However, it has moderately low specificity which may cause unnecessary biopsies, follow-ups, and anxiety to patients

Receptor Expression Discrepancy between Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Lesions

Background: Recent studies have shown that the expression status of hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer may change during disease progression. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression status in primary breast cancer and metastatic lesions. Methods: 58 patients with registered biopsy reports or available samples of the primary tumor and distant metastases were included in the final analysis. Biopsy samples were re-stained using immunohistochemical methods to determine receptor status (if not already recorded in previous reports) and re-examined by 2 independent pathologists. Results: Discordance rates for receptor expression status of the primary tumor and distant metastases for ER, PR, and HER2 were 17.4, 45.4, and 13.3%, respectively. No statistically significant difference in overall survival due to receptor expression discordance between the primary tumor and metastatic sites (p > 0.05) was found, although a tendency toward worse survival time was observed in patients with HER2 expression discrepancies. Conclusion: This study showed receptor discordance rates between primary and metastatic breast cancer sites for ER, PR, and HER2 of 17.8, 45.4, and 13.3%, respectively. Re-biopsy and IHC evaluation of metastatic sites for receptor status may change treatment decisions in patients with relapsed/progressed BC

Pretransplant serum ferritin level may be a predictive marker for outcomes in patients having undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Iron overload increases the risk of infections, veno-occlusive disease and hepatic dysfunction in post-transplant period. Our objective was to investigate the association of pre-transplant ferritin levels with complications and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT)