30 research outputs found

    Severe psoriatic dactylitis: when psoriasis involves beyond the skin

    No full text
    Not availabl

    Lichen planus: a comprehensive evidence-based analysis of medical treatment

    No full text
    Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic-relapsing inflammatory skin disease. Although many drugs have been used for the management of LP, some of them lack the backup by strong therapeutic evidence, while others are not suitable for some patients due to safety profile issues. The aim of this study was to review the recent status of available medical therapies for LP to help physicians make better decisions upon best medical practice while facing patients with this condition. A review of published articles on management of LP was conducted with the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. The quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, low or very low. A total of 1366 articles were retrieved, and 219 (16%) were included in the final analysis. Twenty-one different treatment modalities were analysed. The quality of evidence was high for topical steroid and calcineurin inhibitor, while it was moderate for oral steroids. All the other modalities reached low or very low quality of evidence. Topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors are the current first-line therapies, while for other therapies the strength of recommendation is not so evident. Unfortunately, larger randomized, controlled trials to support the efficacy, safety and tolerability of other therapies in LP are lacking, and many of them are recommended based on studies with small sample sizes, lack of standardized outcome measures or lack of controlled duration or even in anecdotal evidence. Thus, large-scale randomized clinical trials are still warranted to establish the exact benefits of other topical treatments, phototherapy, immunosuppressant and new immunomodulators for an optimized treatment of LP. - 2019 European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyFunding sources None declared. This study was supported by grants from Qatar National Research Fund, Qatar Foundation, and MRC fund from Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar (to M.S.).Scopu

    Non‐genetic and genetic predictors of a superficial first basal cell carcinoma

    No full text
    Background: Several observational studies have suggested differences in the risk factor profile between patients with superficial basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and non-superficial BCCs. Objective: To test the reproducibility of previous study findings and to find new genetic and non-genetic predictors for patients with a superficial first BCC. Methods: A total of 14.628 participants of northwestern European descent aged 45 years or older from a prospective population-based cohort study (Rotterdam Study) were linked with the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) of whom 1528 were identified as BCC patients. After exclusion, 948 eligible BCC patients remained for further non-genetic analyses and 1014 for genetic analyses. We included 11 phenotypic, environmental and tumour-specific characteristics, and 20 candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) as potential predictors for patients with a superficial first BCC. We performed binary logistic multivariable regression analyses. Results: We found that patients with a superficial first BCC were significantly younger, almost two times more often female and 12–18 times more likely to have their BCC on the trunk or extremities than patients with a non-superficial first BCC. One SNP (rs12203592), mapped to IRF4, looked promising (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.13–2.97, P-value <0.05), but after adjustment for multiple testing, no significant differences in genetic make-up between superficial BCC and non-superficial BCC patients were found. Conclusion: We conclude that patients with a superficial BCC differ from non-superficial BCC patients with respect to environmental factors (tumour localization as a proxy for UVR exposure) and phenotypic characteristics (age and sex), but we found no difference in genotype. As superficial BCC patients develop their first BCCs at a younger age, they could be at higher lifetime risk for subsequent skin cancers and therefore be an important group for secondary prevention
    corecore