Measurement of volatile organic compounds in sediments of the Scheldt estuary and the southern North Sea

The concentrations and distribution of 13 priority volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were determined in sediments of the Scheldt estuary and the Belgian continental shelf, using a modified Tekmar LSC 2000 purge-and-trap system coupled to GC-MS. The method allows a sample intake of up to 50 g wet weight and detection limits are between 0.003 ng/g (tetrachloromethane) and 0.16 ng/g (m- and p-xylene). The repeatability (n = 5) varied between 4% (benzene) and 17% (toluene) and the recoveries ranged from 59% (1,1-dichloroethane) to 99% (tetrachloromethane). Because of the nature of the contaminants, special attention was paid to analyte losses and contamination of the samples during storage aboard the research vessel. Spiked sediment samples were prepared in the laboratory and stored aboard under the same conditions as the environmental samples. The recoveries for these samples varied between 94 and 130%, which suggests that storage had no adverse effect on the samples. No detectable VOC concentrations were found for most of the sampling stations. However, in the Antwerp harbour area, significant concentrations of VOCs were found. The sorption behaviour as predicted from laboratory equilibrium partitioning experiments gives an indication of the in situ partitioning behaviour of VOCs. Although VOCs in sediments should, in general, not be regarded as a major problem in the marine environment, high local concentrations may be a cause of concern

Analytical method for the determination of trichlorobenzenes in marine biota (poster)

Trichlorobenzenes (TCBs) were intensively used in the last decades as essential components of dielectric fluids, intermediates in chemical synthesis, solvents, coolants, lubricants, heat-transfer medium; insecticide, additive in polyester dyeing and components of termite-control preparations (1, 2). Due to their widespread occurrence in the various environmental compartments they have been classified by OSPARCOM (Oslo and Paris Commissions) (3) as chemicals for priority action and have been proposed by the Marine Chemistry Working Group (MCWG) as chemical parameters in the Water Framework Directive (4). Based on their octanol-water partitioning coefficients (log Kow = 4.02-4.49) (5) and bioconcentration factors in fish (ranging from 182 to 3200, depending on the lipid content) (6), these chemicals are expected to bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms.Against their potential significance in the marine environment there is relatively little information available concerning the actual concentration levels and distribution of trichlorobenzenes in marine organisms (7, 8).The aim of this work was to develop an analytical method appropriate for the determination of TCBs in marine biota.The analytical method consists of saponification of the fish tissue with methanolic potassium hydroxide, liquid-liquid extraction of the solution with pentane, clean up of the concentrated extract on alumina column and analysis of the extract with gas chromatograph equipped with electron capture detector (ECD). The method proved to be appropriate for the detection of concentration levels typical of the organic contaminants in biota (7) (~1 ng /g wet weight of tissue). The relative standard deviation of the analysis of 1,3,5-, 1,2,4- and 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene was 8, 6 and 18% (n=4) respectively. Higher recoveries of the analytes were obtained with spiked fish samples than with standard solutions (88, 96 and 78 instead of 53, 50 and 32% of 1,3,5-, 1,2,4- and 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene respectively). One plausible explanation of the difference is that the proteins and glycerides of the fish tissue compete effectively with trichlorobenzenes for the base and their presence decrease their decomposition rate

Odors treatment : biological technologies

Physical-chemical waste gas cleaning techniques have proven their effi ciency and reliability and will continue to occupy their niche, but several disadvantages remain. Among them are high investment and operation costs and the possible generation of secondary waste streams. With biological waste treatment techniques, reactor engineering is often less complicated and consequently costs are less. In addition, usually no secondary wastes are produced. Biological methods are nonhazardous and benign for the environment. Possible drawbacks are restricted knowledge about the biodegradation processes, limited process control, and relatively slow reaction kinetics. Anyway, the biological methods for the removal of odors and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from waste gases are cost-effective technologies, when low concentrations (below 1-10 g/m -3 ) are to be dealt with (Kosteltz et al., 1996). Therefore, decision making can be based merely on economical analysis. Like the treatment of liquid effl uents, gaseous streams will be more often considered for biological treatment. For organic compounds, the biological reaction can be described as: CHO + O 2 + nutrients C 5 H 7 O 2 N (cell dry weight) + CO 2 + H 2 O + heat When heteroatoms are present (e.g., chlorine, sulfur), end-products like HCl or H 2 SO 4 can be formed. For effi cient pollutant removal, target pollutants have to be suffi ciently biodegradable and bioavailable. A major advantage in the case of odor treatment is that biocatalysts have high affi nity for the substrates, which allows effi cient treatment of low infl uent concentrations. Biocatalysts also operate at room temperature and they have innocuous fi nal products (e.g., carbon dioxide and water). Provided that you have the right inocula, microorganisms can metabolize almost every compound there is. In general, odors consist of a very complex mixture of volatile organic as well as inorganic compounds. The most relevant compounds regarding odors in the food industry are nitrogencontaining compou(undefined