Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the women invited to the COVIDPregDK cohort:a non-response analysis

Aim: This study aimed to examine the demographic characteristics associated with participation in the COVIDPregDK cohort, aiming to identify potential sources of selection bias. Methods: In this nationwide register-based cohort study, data were used from the COVIDPregDK study, which encompasses a cohort of pregnant women from 2020 and linked them to data from the Danish registries. A comparison between women responding and those who did not respond to the questionnaire was conducted to assess their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. The associations between respondents and various characteristics were analysed using logistic regression models. Results: The questionnaire garnered a response rate of 60%, with participation from 17,047 pregnant women and non-participation from 11,577. Respondent women were most often 30–34 years of age, of Danish origin, highly educated, and had the highest family income than non-respondents. Additionally, women above 35 years represented the most decisive risk factor of responding (35–39: odds ratio (OR) 1.17 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.27); 40+: OR 1.27 95% CI 1.10–1.48)). Characteristics of non-respondents: families with three or more children (OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.47–0.64)); immigrants (OR 0.38 (95% CI 0.35–0.40)) and descendants (OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.34–0.45)); low educated (OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.36–0.44)) and low income (OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.61–0.72)). Conclusions: This study found significant demographic and socioeconomic disparities between respondent and non-respondent pregnant women in the COVIDPregDK study, indicating higher participation from women with higher socioeconomic status. Despite the societal lockdown during COVID-19, the lockdown did not mitigate the pre-existing factors hindering women with low socioeconomic status from engaging in research.</p

Intersection of inflammation and herbal medicine in the treatment of osteoarthritis

Herbal remedies and dietary supplements have become an important area of research and clinical practice in orthopaedics and rheumatology. Understanding the risks and benefits of using herbal medicines in the treatment of arthritis, rheumatic diseases, and musculoskeletal complaints is a key priority of physicians and their patients. This review discusses the latest advances in the use of herbal medicines for treating osteoarthritis (OA) by focusing on the most significant trends and developments. This paper sets the scene by providing a brief introduction to ethnopharmacology, Ayurvedic medicine, and nutrigenomics before discussing the scientific and mechanistic rationale for targeting inflammatory signalling pathways in OA by use of herbal medicines. Special attention is drawn to the conceptual and practical difficulties associated with translating data from in-vitro experiments to in-vivo studies. Issues relating to the low bioavailability of active ingredients in herbal medicines are discussed, as also is the need for large-scale, randomized clinical trial

Effectiveness and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for knee osteoarthritis: results from a 12-month follow up of an open-label study

Objective: There are few effective osteoarthritis (OA) therapies. A novel injectable polyacrylamide hydrogel (iPAAG) previously demonstrated efficacy and safety up to week 26 in an open-label study of knee OA. Here we report longer-term effectiveness and safety data. Methods: This multi-centre, open-label study included patients with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA. Primary outcome was WOMAC pain (0–100 scale) at 13 weeks, and patients continued to 26 weeks before entering a further 26-week extension phase. Secondary efficacy outcomes included WOMAC stiffness and function subscales, Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders. Safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs). Results: 49 participants (31 women, mean age 70) received an ultrasound-guided, intra-articular injection of 6 ml iPAAG; 46 completed the extension phase to 52 weeks. There was a significant reduction in the WOMAC pain score from baseline to 52 weeks (− 17.7 points (95% CI − 23.1; − 12.4); p < 0.0001). Similar sustained improvements were observed for WOMAC stiffness (11.0 points; 95% CI − 17.0; − 4.9), physical function (18.0 points; 95% CI − 19.1; − 10.6), and PGA (16.3 points; 95% CI − 23.1; − 9.4). At 52 weeks 62.2% of patients were OMERACT-OARSI responders. From 26 to 52 weeks, 8 adverse effects (AE), including 1 serious AE (cerebrovascular accident) were reported in 5 subjects. None of the new adverse events were thought to be device related. Conclusion: This open-label study suggests persistent benefits and safety of iPAAG through 52 weeks after a single injection. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04179552

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis acquire sustainable skills for home monitoring: a prospective dual-country cohort study (ELECTOR clinical trial I)

Objective: In an eHealth setting, to investigate intra- and interrater reliability and agreement of joint assessments and Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and test the effect of repeated joint assessment training. Methods: Patients with DAS28-CRP ≤ 5.1 were included in a prospective cohort study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02317939). Intrarater reliability and agreement of patient-performed joint counts were assessed through completion of 5 joint assessments over a 2-month period. All patients received training on joint assessment at baseline; only half of the patients received repeated training. A subset of patients was included in an appraisal of interrater reliability and agreement comparing joint assessments completed by patients, healthcare professionals (HCP), and ultrasonography. Cohen’s κ coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for quantifying of reliability of joint assessments and DAS28-CRP. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Results: Intrarater reliability was excellent with ICC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.90) and minimal detectable change of 1.13. ICC for interrater reliability ranged between 0.69 and 0.90 (good to excellent). Patients tended to rate DAS28-CRP slightly higher than HCP. In patients receiving repeated training, a mean difference in DAS28-CRP of –0.08 was observed (limits of agreements of –1.06 and 0.90). After 2 months, reliability between patients and HCP was similar between groups receiving single or repeated training. Conclusion: Patient-performed assessments of joints and DAS28-CRP in an eHealth home-monitoring solution were reliable and comparable with HCP. Patients can acquire the necessary skills to conduct a correct joint assessment after initial and thorough training. [clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02317939)

Exercise and education vs intra-articular saline for knee osteoarthritis:a 1-year follow-up of a randomized trial

Objective: To assess the longer-term effect of the Good Life with osteoarthritis in Denmark (GLAD) exercise and education program relative to open-label placebo (OLP) on changes from baseline in core outcomes in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: In this 1-year follow-up of an open-label, randomized trial, patients with symptomatic and radiographically confirmed knee OA were monitored after being randomized to either the 8-week GLAD program or OLP given as 4 intra-articular saline injections over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS) pain subscale after 1 year in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary outcomes were the KOOS function and quality of life subscales, and Patients' Global Assessment of disease impact. Results: 206 adults were randomly assigned: 102 to GLAD and 104 to OLP, of which only 137 (63/74 GLAD/OLP) provided data at 1 year. At one year the mean changes in KOOS pain were 8.4 for GLAD and 7.0 for OLP (Difference: 1.5 points; 95% CI −2.6 to 5.5). There were no between-group differences in any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusions: In this 1-year follow-up of individuals with knee OA, the 8-week GLAD program and OLP both provided minor longer-term benefits with no group difference. These results require confirmation given the significant loss to follow-up. Trial registration number: NCT03843931.</p

Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: A 6 Months Prospective Study

Objective: Intra-Articular (IA) injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) is a possible treatment for symptomatic Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single injection of 6 ml intra-articular PAAG over 26 weeks. Methods: Open-label study in patients with symptomatic and radiographically confirmed knee OA . Primary outcome was change in WOMAC pain after 13 weeks. Secondary outcomes were WOMAC stiffness and function subscales, Patient Global Assessment of disease impact (PGA) and proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders. Follow-up time points were 4, 13 and 26 weeks. Results: 49 patients (31 females) received PAAG, with 48 patients completing the 13 and 46 the 26 weeks assessments. Mean change in WOMAC pain after 13 weeks was -18.3 points [95% CI-23.4 to -13.3]; P<.0001 and at 26 weeks -20.8 points [95% CI -26.3 to -15.3]; P<0.0001 with similar benefits for WOMAC stiffness, physical function, and PGA. After 13 weeks 64.6% were OMERACT-OARSI responders and this was maintained at 26 weeks.. During the 13 weeks, 18 patients reported 23 adverse events, 13 of which were related to PAAG, none severe. Two serious adverse events, atrial fibrillation and gastrointestinal pain, were assessed as ‘not related’ to PAAG. Conclusions: PAAG can be delivered in a single 6 ml injection and this non-randomized trial in patients with knee OA demonstrated beneficial clinical effects at 13 and 26 weeks. No serious adverse events were seen with PAAG. These encouraging results need to be confirmed in controlled studies

Who are likely to benefit from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLAD) exercise and education program? An effect modifier analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Objective: To identify contextual factors that modify the treatment effect of the ‘Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark’ (GLAD) exercise and education programme compared to open-label placebo (OLP) on knee pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Secondary effect modifier analysis of a randomised controlled trial. 206 participants with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA were randomised to either the 8-week GLAD programme (n = 102) or OLP given as 4 intra-articular saline injections over 8 weeks (n = 104). The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 9 in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS) pain subscale (range 0 (worst) to 100 (best)). Subgroups were created based on baseline information: BMI, swollen study knee, bilateral radiographic knee OA, sports participation as a young adult, sex, median age, a priori treatment preference, regular use of analgesics (NSAIDs or paracetamol), radiographic disease severity, and presence of constant or intermittent pain. Results: Participants who reported use of analgesics at baseline seem to benefit from the GLAD programme over OLP (subgroup contrast: 10.3 KOOS pain points (95% CI 3.0 to 17.6)). Participants with constant pain at baseline also seem to benefit from GLAD over OLP (subgroup contrast: 10.0 points (95% CI 2.8 to 17.2)). Conclusions: These results imply that patients who take analgesics or report constant knee pain, GLAD seems to yield clinically relevant benefits on knee pain when compared to OLP. The results support a stratified recommendation of GLAD as management of knee OA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03843931. EudraCT number 2019-000809-71.</p

Intra-articular vs. systemic administration of etanercept in antigen-induced arthritis in the temporomandibular joint. Part II: mandibular growth

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis in children causes alterations in the craniomandibular growth. Resultant abnormalities include; condylar erosions, a posterior mandibular rotation pattern, micrognathia, malocclusion with an anterior open bite, altered joint and muscular function occasionally associated with pain. These alterations may be prevented by early aggressive anti-inflammatory intervention. Previously, we have shown that intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid reduces TMJ inflammation but causes additional mandibular growth inhibition in young rabbits. Local blockage of TNF-α may be an alternative treatment approach against TMJ involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We evaluated the anti-inflammatory effect of IA etanercept compared to subcutaneous etanercept in antigen-induced TMJ-arthritis in young rabbits in terms of mandibular growth. This article (Part II) presents the data and discussion on the effects on facial growth. In Part I the anti-inflammatory effects of systemic and IA etanercept administration are discussed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Arthritis was induced and maintained in the TMJs of 10-week old pre-sensitized rabbits (n = 42) by four repeated IA TMJ injections with ovalbumin, over a 12-week period. One group was treated weekly with systemic etanercept (0.8 mg/kg) (n = 14), another group (n = 14) received IA etanercept (0.1 mg/kg) bilaterally one week after induction of arthritis and one group (n = 14) served as an untreated arthritis group receiving IA TMJ saline injections. Head computerized tomographic scans were done before arthritis was induced and at the end of the study. Three small tantalum implants were inserted into the mandible, serving as stable landmarks for the super-impositions. Nineteen variables were evaluated in a mandibular growth analysis for inter-group differences. All data was evaluated blindedly. ANOVA and T-tests were applied for statistical evaluation using p < 0.05 as significance level.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Significant larger mandibular growth disturbances were observed in the group receiving IA saline injections compared with the systemic etanercept group. The most pronounced unfavourable posterior mandibular rotation pattern was observed in the group receiving IA saline injections.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Intervention with systemic etanercept monotherapy equivalent to the recommended human dose allows a mandibular growth towards an original morphology in experimental TMJ arthritis. Systemic administrations of etanercept are superior to IA TMJ administration of etanercept in maintaining mandibular vertical growth.</p