Quantitative Analysis of the MGMT Methylation Status of Glioblastomas in Light of the 2021 WHO Classification.

Glioblastomas with methylation of the promoter region of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene exhibit increased sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy. Quantitative assessment of the MGMT promoter methylation status might provide additional prognostic information. The aim of our study was to determine a quantitative methylation threshold for better survival among patients with glioblastomas. We included consecutive patients ≥18 years treated at our department between 11/2010 and 08/2018 for a glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, undergoing quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A total of 321 patients were included. Median overall survival was 12.6 months. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox regression analysis showed better survival for the groups with 16-30%, 31-60%, and 61-100% methylation. In contrast, survival in the group with 1-15% methylation was similar to those with unmethylated promoter regions. A secondary analysis confirmed this threshold. Better survival is observed in patients with glioblastomas with ≥16% methylation of the MGMT promoter region than with <16% methylation. Survival with tumors with 1-15% methylation is similar to with unmethylated tumors. Above 16% methylation, we found no additional benefit with increasing methylation

Surgical management and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma without contrast enhancement (<i>low-grade appearance</i>):a report of the RANO <i>resect </i>group

BackgroundResection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor represents the standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, some tumors ultimately diagnosed as glioblastoma lack contrast enhancement and have a ‘low-grade appearance’ on imaging (non-CE glioblastoma). We aimed to (a) volumetrically define the value of non-CE tumor resection in the absence of contrast enhancement, and to (b) delineate outcome differences between glioblastoma patients with and without contrast enhancement.MethodsThe RANO resect group retrospectively compiled a global, eight-center cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. The associations between postoperative tumor volumes and outcome were analyzed. Propensity score-matched analyses were constructed to compare glioblastomas with and without contrast enhancement.ResultsAmong 1323 newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, we identified 98 patients (7.4%) without contrast enhancement. In such patients, smaller postoperative tumor volumes were associated with more favorable outcome. There was an exponential increase in risk for death with larger residual non-CE tumor. Accordingly, extensive resection was associated with improved survival compared to lesion biopsy. These findings were retained on a multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic and clinical markers. Compared to CE glioblastoma, patients with non-CE glioblastoma had a more favorable clinical profile and superior outcome as confirmed in propensity score analyses by matching the patients with non-CE glioblastoma to patients with CE glioblastoma using a large set of clinical variables.ConclusionsThe absence of contrast enhancement characterizes a less aggressive clinical phenotype of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Maximal resection of non-CE tumors has prognostic implications and translates into favorable outcome